Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 01-05-2021, 12:21 AM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 51,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmog220d View Post
Oh, Poopy Poop!

As for the accuracy of the scale, I trust German engineering and manufacturing skills. Plus, on these engines those whacky Germans provided a way to adjust the pointer to match actual, for real TDC:

- Pull #1 injector and pre-chamber;
- Insert wood dowel rod into the hole 'til it rests on the top of the piston;
- Rotate engine at crank on compression stroke for #1 until the dowel indicates true TDC for #1;
- Check the pointer on the front of the engine for accuracy against the scale. If found to be inaccurate loosen its retaining bolt and adjust the pointer to indicate TDC; and
- Problem(s) solved.

Actually if you have a long enough extension you can do as you said and hoop up a dial indicator to get TDC if you want to check the pointer.

I think it was Army/Stretch that mentioned you can bring the Piston up close to TDC and remove the upper Valve Spring Retainer and let the vlave go down and contact the piston. Arrange the dial indicator so that the extension is on the top of the valve stem and slowly and carefully continue the rotation in the proper direction till TDC. Then look down and see if what is lined up with the pointer.

Concerning the match marks on the cam Tower and the back of the timing gear. The angle that you are viewing them at can throw off your reading.

Concerning Engine Match Marks in general they are used all over the world on any manner of Engines and have proved sufficient for practical purposes. And these Engines have been around long enough for some issue to have previously shown up and be known concerning the Engine Match Marks.

__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-05-2021, 12:33 AM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 51,244
[QUOTE=Shern;4127843]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Reiner View Post
Was Socrates a post-structuralist?

The Socratic response would have included both point and counterpoint.
Looks like we got there in the end.

Thank you gents, I appreciate the techniques.
Lately I’ve seen more discussions on rolling a new chain, than those using offset keys. Could be a function of age or just a dying art. I have been curious all the same.

Thanks again
I think a lot of the trepidation over when to replace a timing chain is due to some makes of Cars needed the Timing Chains replaced after say 150 thousand miles changed due to the Nylon gear teeth on the larger gear and the use of no timing chain tensioner (when I replaced that on my Chevy 4.3 liter engine both replacment gears had steel teeth).
Next would be the Mechanics either uneducated in Mercedes 617.952s or looking for work to scare you and trying to sell you a timing chain replacement job.

It seems pretty well know now that on the 617.952s it is the Timer Bushing that is the most frequent cause of the Vacuum Pump failures that snap timing chains and damage engines. Next in line would be some issue with the Vacuum Pump.

The other thing but not specific to the timing chain is if that little snap ring on the Oil Pump Chain tensioner wears out and the tensioner shoe move around and caused binding on the Chain. Or if the spring broke.

I guess next would be an issue with the The Timing Chain Tensioner rail or the tensioner.

Notice that the above has nothing to do with the IWIS/jWIS timing chain itself.
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-06-2021, 01:29 PM
Shern's Avatar
Semi-registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,814
911 to the rescue, eh?
Thank you for that. I’ve always felt the cam/dial issue was a little over blown.
Reminds me a bit of speeding ticket litigation in the 90s. The argument being the position of driver’s head caused misread of speedo dial. I’d love to see a comparison of the dial gauge method versus cam/balancer marks.

The timer bushing issue pertains to the 616 as well I’m assuming?
__________________
1981 240D 4sp manual. Ivory White.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-09-2021, 12:26 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: CA
Posts: 208
Having timed at least 200 sets of camshafts for maximum power on a dyno there are a few observations:

1. 3 degrees is not going to be noticed with a conventional street cam in a diesel. You would need a very high performance cam for it to make more than a 2% difference
2. The dial indicator method is not all that accurate. You can easily be off 2-3 degrees when comparing to hard stop index methods used by race teams and OEM production.

The decision is always up to the owner, but don't expect much.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page