Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-28-2022, 06:49 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 185
Idler Arm Bushing question 126

I installed the genuine Mercedes replacement and torqued to 134 ftlbs.

The arm moves freely but there is light resistance. Is this normal?

Does this affect return to center?

__________________
190D SOLD
2.5 non turbo
5 speed manual transmission
Build date: December 1985
W211 E320 CDI
W126 350SDL
X204 GLK 250 Sans Bluetec
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-28-2022, 07:16 PM
JHZR2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,446
Isn’t this one that needs to be torqued with the car on the ground, suspension weighted? Is that how you did it?
__________________
Current Diesels:
1981 240D (73K)
1982 300CD (169k)
1985 190D (169k)
1991 350SD (116k)
1991 350SD (206k)
1991 300D (228k)
2008 ML320 CDI (199k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (267k)

Past Diesels:
1983 300D (228K), 1985 300D (233K), 1993 300D 2.5T (338k), 1993 300SD (291k)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-28-2022, 07:38 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHZR2 View Post
Isn’t this one that needs to be torqued with the car on the ground, suspension weighted? Is that how you did it?

I believe that is only the upper and lower control arms and stabilizer ends.
I dont see how that would impact the idler arm in any way.
__________________
190D SOLD
2.5 non turbo
5 speed manual transmission
Build date: December 1985
W211 E320 CDI
W126 350SDL
X204 GLK 250 Sans Bluetec
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-28-2022, 09:15 PM
Graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by Proctor750 View Post
I installed the genuine Mercedes replacement and torqued to 134 ftlbs.

The arm moves freely but there is light resistance. Is this normal?

Does this affect return to center?
I don't have access to W126 manual, but my 107 and 123 both specify 120NM torque. Which is only 89 ft.lb. Perhaps the 126 uses a heavier bolt? You don't have to have wheels on ground to torque that bolt!

The bolt torque should not affect the resistance to turning. It just compresses the two internal metal sleeves against each other. If the end bearings do get compressed, then you will get resistance. That should not happen. If it does, a shim washer can be inserted between the internal sleeves. There is supposed to be a small amount of vertical slack.

I initially bought an aftermarket Lemfoerder kit. It was simply just wrong. I had to add 5 or 6 shims before it would turn freely. I returned it and bought a genuine kit that fitted and worked perfectly.

If the idler bearing is tight, it will affect centering. You will get what they call memory steer. Believe me, I had that until I replaced the bearing kit.

__________________
Graham
85 300D,72 350SL, 98 E320, Outback 2.5
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-29-2022, 12:54 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham View Post
I don't have access to W126 manual, but my 107 and 123 both specify 120NM torque. Which is only 89 ft.lb. Perhaps the 126 uses a heavier bolt? You don't have to have wheels on ground to torque that bolt!

The bolt torque should not affect the resistance to turning. It just compresses the two internal metal sleeves against each other. If the end bearings do get compressed, then you will get resistance. That should not happen. If it does, a shim washer can be inserted between the internal sleeves. There is supposed to be a small amount of vertical slack.

I initially bought an aftermarket Lemfoerder kit. It was simply just wrong. I had to add 5 or 6 shims before it would turn freely. I returned it and bought a genuine kit that fitted and worked perfectly.

If the idler bearing is tight, it will affect centering. You will get what they call memory steer. Believe me, I had that until I replaced the bearing kit.

I believe 126 torque spec is 180nm or ~134ft lbs. It was a bear to unbolt and it moved much more freely with the old bushings.

So I could add another couple of mm shim to the bottom where the bottom nut attaches? The top is just a dust shield and washer.

I did see various thickness bottom shims available somewhere before..

But it should be completely loose with 0 stiction?


What's frustrating is that I bought the Mercedes Genuine kit, not the Lemforder 3mm too short stuff mentioned here: https://www.benzworld.org/threads/idler-arm-bush-failed-quickly.3058754/

I suppose I will need to shoot for a lower torque or else find some way to shim between the 2 inner sleeve halves as .5mm end float is permissible
__________________
190D SOLD
2.5 non turbo
5 speed manual transmission
Build date: December 1985
W211 E320 CDI
W126 350SDL
X204 GLK 250 Sans Bluetec

Last edited by Proctor750; 08-29-2022 at 01:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-29-2022, 03:40 AM
JHZR2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,446
Quote:
Originally Posted by Proctor750 View Post
I believe that is only the upper and lower control arms and stabilizer ends.
I dont see how that would impact the idler arm in any way.
Sorry… jet lag and not thinking straight. Lol.
__________________
Current Diesels:
1981 240D (73K)
1982 300CD (169k)
1985 190D (169k)
1991 350SD (116k)
1991 350SD (206k)
1991 300D (228k)
2008 ML320 CDI (199k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (267k)

Past Diesels:
1983 300D (228K), 1985 300D (233K), 1993 300D 2.5T (338k), 1993 300SD (291k)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-29-2022, 12:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 185
Is it possible that it will wear in? Or should it swing completely freely immediately? I just don't understand how the new in box factory piece has any resistance at all. It's not much but it's nothing like the old ones which were also genuine.


UPDATE:
I checked the manual and indeed it's 120NM... I have no idea why I thought it was 180NM now and the old one had to have been completely overtorqued yet worked fine. So perhaps the lower torque might help but I may need to beat the 2 halves back out some before attempting to retorque. They could be mashed together or something.

And the additional shims they mention are indeed for the bottom nut. I wonder if my old one is thicker - I will need to bust out the calipers.
Attached Thumbnails
Idler Arm Bushing question 126-idler-1.png   Idler Arm Bushing question 126-idler-2.png  
__________________
190D SOLD
2.5 non turbo
5 speed manual transmission
Build date: December 1985
W211 E320 CDI
W126 350SDL
X204 GLK 250 Sans Bluetec

Last edited by Proctor750; 08-29-2022 at 01:21 PM. Reason: New info
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-29-2022, 01:57 PM
Graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,457
If the idler is tight, the shim that is needed goes between the two inner bushings. Perhaps you won't need any if proper torque is used.

As I understand it, the washer that goes under the nut or idler arm is to adjust height relative to pitman arm. That shouldn't really affect the freedom to rotate.

With OE bearing kit you shouldn't have needed the inner shim. I bought thin shim/spacer washers at Home Depot when I was trying to overcome excessive friction in the Lemfoerder bushing. The shim goes where arrow points in pic below:

__________________
Graham
85 300D,72 350SL, 98 E320, Outback 2.5
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-29-2022, 03:48 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham View Post
If the idler is tight, the shim that is needed goes between the two inner bushings. Perhaps you won't need any if proper torque is used.

As I understand it, the washer that goes under the nut or idler arm is to adjust height relative to pitman arm. That shouldn't really affect the freedom to rotate.

With OE bearing kit you shouldn't have needed the inner shim. I bought thin shim/spacer washers at Home Depot when I was trying to overcome excessive friction in the Lemfoerder bushing. The shim goes where arrow points in pic below:


Agreed, I will undo the bolt and hammer each bushing back out a little then retorque to 120nm.



Although putting the shim between the halves makes sense to me, the mercedes diagram points to the 2.5 and 3mm interchangeable shims going under the Nut.


There is also the ability to change the thick washer above the dust shield at the top for helping with centering the ball point position. But no mention of having one between the two halves.
Attached Thumbnails
Idler Arm Bushing question 126-idler-3.png  
__________________
190D SOLD
2.5 non turbo
5 speed manual transmission
Build date: December 1985
W211 E320 CDI
W126 350SDL
X204 GLK 250 Sans Bluetec
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-29-2022, 04:28 PM
Graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by Proctor750 View Post
Although putting the shim between the halves makes sense to me, the mercedes diagram points to the 2.5 and 3mm interchangeable shims going under the Nut.
As mentioned earlier, those thicker shims under nut are for height adjustment. Not the same purpose at all as the thin shim (which you should not need anyway)

On my car, I couldn't see how changing the idler bushings could change the relative height of idler and pitman, so I never considered those thicker shims.
__________________
Graham
85 300D,72 350SL, 98 E320, Outback 2.5
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-01-2022, 10:59 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 185
Well I backed the nut off entirely and it swings totally free with 0 resistance. I torqued it to exactly 120ft lbs and there's still slight resistance as before.



I undid the bold again and hammered the bushings out a tad then re-torqued and the exact same resistance applies. I even tried tightening to about 60NM first and it still had the same resistance.



So basically any torque on the nut at all produces this slight resistance. It's not much and perhaps the wheels/suspension will overpower it but it's definitely not floppy like it was with the old bushings.



It is the nut/bolt and washers which rotate and not the bushings which I believe is correct but there is just enough resistance that if you let go of the pitman arm it doesn't swing down on it's own weight. It is smooth and you can move it with your pinky which is why I think the wheels/suspension should still overpower it and perhaps wear them in?




I'm just going to go with it and see what happens. Not much else I can do at this point.
__________________
190D SOLD
2.5 non turbo
5 speed manual transmission
Build date: December 1985
W211 E320 CDI
W126 350SDL
X204 GLK 250 Sans Bluetec
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-01-2022, 11:48 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,425
Slight resistance should be fine, I'd expect some not zero. If there isn't any memory steer and the car finds on center without fail...drive on!!!

If you can find a GOOD alignment shop e.g., a frame shop the difference when everything is dialed in is amazing.

Good luck!!!
__________________
"Rudeness is a weak man's imitation of strength" - Eric Hoffer
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-01-2022, 02:02 PM
Graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by Proctor750 View Post
So basically any torque on the nut at all produces this slight resistance. It's not much and perhaps the wheels/suspension will overpower it but it's definitely not floppy like it was with the old bushings.

It is the nut/bolt and washers which rotate and not the bushings which I believe is correct but there is just enough resistance that if you let go of the pitman arm it doesn't swing down on it's own weight.
Actually, when clamped together by the bolt torque, the inner metal sleeves, the end washers and the bolt are supposed to rotate in unison within the rubber sleeves.

The torque on the nut should not make any difference to the turning resistance if the overall face to face length of the two inner sleeves is correct. If that distance is too short, then the end washers put frictional force on the bearing faces within the rubber sleeves.

If interested, this is quite a long thread describing my learning experiences with a similar idler arm. A second problem I found and addressed, was that the rubber inserts could rotate within the chassis tube. They should not. They should be a tight fit in the tube.
https://www.benzworld.org/threads/idler-arm-bushing-replace.3059235/
__________________
Graham
85 300D,72 350SL, 98 E320, Outback 2.5
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-01-2022, 02:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham View Post
Actually, when clamped together by the bolt torque, the inner metal sleeves, the end washers and the bolt are supposed to rotate in unison within the rubber sleeves.

The torque on the nut should not make any difference to the turning resistance if the overall face to face length of the two inner sleeves is correct. If that distance is too short, then the end washers put frictional force on the bearing faces within the rubber sleeves.

If interested, this is quite a long thread describing my learning experiences with a similar idler arm. A second problem I found and addressed, was that the rubber inserts could rotate within the chassis tube. They should not. They should be a tight fit in the tube.
https://www.benzworld.org/threads/idler-arm-bushing-replace.3059235/

I think we are saying the same thing - the rubber "inserts" do not move and should not move. The nut/bolt/washer assembly are what rotate. Even if I back the nut off the spacer entirely it they all still move together. So I think the function is correct but perhaps this newer assembly just has a tad more friction than the old one. I should have put the digital calipers on old and new to compare but we shall see how it goes.



I'm checking that thread out now - I believe I have read some of it back when I first ordered the replacement kit which is why I chose to go with Mercedes genuine so I have you to thank for that.

__________________
190D SOLD
2.5 non turbo
5 speed manual transmission
Build date: December 1985
W211 E320 CDI
W126 350SDL
X204 GLK 250 Sans Bluetec
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page