![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bring back my 2.5 190d
Hello to forum and thanks in advance for any help.I have owned many mbs over the years although none newer than 94. I have a 87 2.5t that way back in the 90 had a drip from between engine and trans...so I had a mechanic replace the seal...when he gave me the car back it did not move...i dont remember any tranny problems before...he was not a mb specialist...the good part it doesn't leak
![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Does it have fluid in the tranny?
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual. ![]() ..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I was so excited it ran forgot to check...but I will tonite...mechanic would have after repair...dextron ok for this ? And is any chance fluid wouldn't get into torqe converter even if shows ok on dipstick?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
If the transmission fluid is fine but still does not move. Look to see if the shifter linkage is installed, it should be high up on the trans in the tunnel, so get a good light to check
Typically there are 2 connections, one to the shifter are and a second to the transmission linkage. Possible was not reconnected properly. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
So checked fluid after letting run a bit nothing showing on stick ..but added some fluid about a quart...let it run again and now shows up to bump on stick.i have one of those cameras with flex head so I tuck it in nr shift linkage which is on driver side of tranny...the play does not seem excessive.i go in car and with camera I see the shaft on side of tranny moving with the gear selector.it does seem too easy to shift like there usual is some resistance in other mb I had...but maybe they had worn linkages.
I am curious where the other linkage is you referenced...?thanks for your help ! |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Not the best image, but should help you visualize the components. The blue squares denote the shifter bushings, so each of these is a linkage point. The goal was to see and ensure that the shifter handle is connected and imparting movement on the shifter stub in the side of the trans.
__________________
Stable Mates: 1987 300TD 310K mi (Hans) 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee OM642 165k mi (Benzrokee) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Yup I used camera to verify linkage is moving lever on side of tranny...so that's out...suppose you could disconnect the linkage to move it by hand but seems something would be felt when running the positions.the only other cable I saw was the bowden cable...is there any electronics that would stop engagement?.wondering on next step...could test line pressure but it's tight in tunnel already wondering how hard it is to get to the top bellhousing bolts to remove tranny
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
The only other test I can think of at the moment is to test the transmission pump. I think if you were to remove one of the trans cooler lines, attach to a hose or place a large container under the disconnected line, run the engine and see if fluid is being pumped thru. That will confirm your pump.
You can also using a hose, sealed on the trans dipstick, to blow air into the trans to confirm no pressure build up, or rather that the vent is clear. Regarding removal of the trans. Disconnecting to trans mount (rear) and utilizing it's weight, will help tilt both trans and engine down towards the rear. Using socket extensions, in this position with the assembly hanging onto engine only, should give you better access to the upper bellhousing bolts. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks 87td. I like that idea but wouldn't fluid leak out from disconected line even if pump wasn't working what would I be looking for the fluid blasting out? What psi is the cooler line?
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
You will get a little fluid dribbling out, primarily from the cooler side, cap that off. From the trans side, fluid should not come out until the pump pushes it, then it will gush out, not sure at what PSI, but not extreme. Just a quick test to see if the pump is working or not.
Not knowing what your mechanic did 20 years ago, but to replace the seal and then not have the trans work afterwards, means an error was made. Either way the mechanic had to go thru the front cover and pump assembly to replace the cover seal, so possible something was missed on reassembly. The trans will likely have to come out to assess. Good luck
__________________
Stable Mates: 1987 300TD 310K mi (Hans) 2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee OM642 165k mi (Benzrokee) |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks again td...I was wondering about that...now my complaint was drip between engine bellhousing..it could have been r crak seal or tranny front seal...makes me feel old to say I don't remember which he said it was back in the 90s lol..so I agree something was messed up...if we assume it was the tranny seal replaced..are you saying the pump must be removed to access this seal?...also wondering if there was a way to reusable wrong where torque converter..is not connected to internals of the tranny
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Weird that it won’t move. Since you checked the linkage, I’m going to still guess low fluid. I had a 300d once that would leak from someplace and when atf got low enough it would be sluggish or unable to move.
I’d want to drop the pan and see anyway. Then rebaseline all fluids. Oil, ATF, psf and filter, diff oil, antifreeze. Check air filter. New battery. New tires. Possibly new brake hoses. New belt. I’d change all again early after sitting in case junk was flushed out or loosened up. Good luck!
__________________
Current Diesels: 1981 240D (73K) 1982 300CD (169k) 1985 190D (169k) 1991 350SD (116k) 1991 350SD (206k) 1991 300D (228k) 2008 ML320 CDI (199k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (267k) Past Diesels: 1983 300D (228K), 1985 300D (233K), 1993 300D 2.5T (338k), 1993 300SD (291k) |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Snafu,
Regarding the front lip seal on the input shaft, removal of the front cover and pump in not totally required, but is the recommended approach. The old seal can be pried out, and a new seal tapped in around the perimeter. Generally, though a press would be a better way of seating the seal evenly and with the input shaft in way, that would be hard to do. Removing the unit complete makes the job easier, and of course the cover seal should have been replaced as well in the process, both are leak points. In your case, given the time the car has sat, the lip seal is most likely permanently deformed out of round at this point and should be changed. I personally can't see how the torque converter cannot be attached to the trans, it sits on a splined shaft, that's the connection between it and the trans thru the input shaft. Now on the other hand, it is possible that the TC was left unbolted from the engine flywheel/flexplate effectively leaving the engine disconnected from the trans. I would suspect some scraping noises, but who knows. You could use a long handled wrench, to turn the engine crank bolt by hand while looking thru the access hole at the bottom of the bellhousing, and see if both the faceplate and TC move together, or at least see the mating bolts themselves to confirm. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you to all who reply..what a helpful forum..so just now I disconect coller lines at radiator and start up vehicle is jacked up in front but no stepper than driving up hill... very unimpressive basically nothing comes out of coller lines...I post picture but made video also..don't think forum allows...so no flow in park or drive postions
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
So I have pic but can't post ..anyway shows pan with cooler hose and nothing coming out...the fluids supposed to circulate even in park for cooling no?..fluid on stick comes up to bump mark
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|