Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-23-2002, 02:52 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 56
Range Rover Mercedes Diesel Conversion

All,
I am a major G wagon and Mercedes diesel fan. Unfortunately I can not afford the G wagon so I bought a 1990 Range Rover with a blown engine. I believe that the 3.0 Turbo Diesel used until 1985 would be a great engine in the Rover, but I can't find a conversion kit so I will have to fab it all. Does anyone have any experience with putting these great diesel Mercedes engines in any Rovers or anything else? Any help is much appreciated

DieselNation
__________________
82 240D - 257k
84 300d - 86k
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-23-2002, 04:16 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 237
Check with Rovers North. They or some other outfit in Maine is doing Diesl conversions to Range Rovers. Not sure which engines they are using though. Keep us posted. I have 2 older Range Rovers and am interested in how it goes. As the Series Land Rovers and euro Range Rovers came with Diesels, there should be engine mounts that will come close depending on bolt-up pattern on block.

Good Luck.
__________________
2008 GL320CDI 6K
1970 280SL 112K
1982 240D 210K (Sold)
1973 220D 220K (Sold)
1967 200D 160K (Sold)
1992 400E 139K (Sold)
1988 300E 148K (Sold)
1987 300D 257K (Sold)
1991 300E 108K (Sold)
1987 300E 131K (Sold)
1978 300D TMU (Sold)
1980 300D TMU (Sold)
MBCA Member
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-24-2002, 12:32 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 65
which tranny to use?

Dieselnation,

I am fancinated with your prospect of combining the tried-n-true MB diesel with sturdy Rover. However,I am curious as to which transmission you are planning to use. I would assume for 4WD purposes the Rover transmission is the only way to go. But will the marriage be possible? Also do you think the MB diesel will have the sufficient torque for moderate 4WD applications? Please post your findings and progress.
good luck
dave
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-24-2002, 04:25 PM
XN6guy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Speaking of trannys

The automatic Range Rovers of that era use a ZF 4HP22 tranny, which is a better performing unit in most every way than the Benz auto trannys that I've tinkered with.

Early 4HP22s had problems with the front clutch seizing due to a little design/lubrication flaw. They were fine as long as you did not rev them above ~2000 RPM for extended periods while in Park or Neutral... emission test procedures brought this little flaw to light.

Post ~1988 trannys were modified so the flaw does not exist. By this time, most of the original flawed units have been replaced OR rebuilt/modified.

Jaguar and Rover did not start using the tranny until 1988/89, and the clutch-seizing problem is pretty much unheard of in those makes. BMW and Peugeot were among the first to make use of the tranny (in 1985/86), and they exprienced many failures on their 1986 and 1987 model cars--thus giving the tranny an unfair bad rep.

They shift consistently, quick but gentle. There is no *stupid* vacuum crap to deal with, and they seem to handle high torque without falling apart.

My 190D could really do without that dumb POS auto slushbox that Benz blessed upon it. A manual tranny or a ZF auto would be sooooo much mo' better.

So... my advice is to try and retain the ZF auto if at all possible. The Benz automatics scare me. Or better yet, convert to a manual tranny--it could probably handle more abuse anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-24-2002, 08:26 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Canton,Texas
Posts: 987
I know there is a company that can make adapter plates for just about anything.... can't remember the link or the name though. If anyone is a member of TDR (Motorhead?) do a search on the conversions section for adapter plate. I think that is where I saw it.
__________________
1985 300D Turbo ~225k
2000 F350 (Powerstroke) 4X4, SWB, CC, SRW, 6spd ~148k
1999 International 4900, DT466e (250hp/660 ft/lbs), Allison MD3060 ~73k
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-25-2002, 09:01 AM
84300DT's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mass.
Posts: 2,219
quite sure it;'s been done

i believe in europe some left hand drive range rovers have been equipped with diesel engines.

edit: checked with my friend the range rover he has was equipped with a bmw diesel.
__________________
1984 300D Turbo - 231k....totalled 11/30/07 RIP

Last edited by 84300DT; 12-26-2002 at 08:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-26-2002, 10:58 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 56
Plenty of Torque - Gearing

Dave 240,
In response to your question about torque, the 3.0 TD has plenty of power for that application. In fact, there were many G-wagons that had the 3.0 without a Turbo. There was even some made with the 240 D motor. The trick is to have the right gearing. While in Low range, I believe a lawnmower engine would move the Range Rover up a hill. It is literally crawling. I don't expect to cruise at 100 mph, but I am sure it will run pretty good.

DieselNation
__________________
82 240D - 257k
84 300d - 86k
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page