|
|
|
|
|
#31
10-17-2008, 03:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#32
10-17-2008, 03:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Basically...
__________________
I'm not a doctor, but I'll have a look.  '85 300SD 245k '87 300SDL 251k '90 300SEL 326k Six others from BMW, GM, and Ford. Liberty will not descend to a people; a people must raise themselves to liberty.[/IMG]
|
|
#33
10-17-2008, 07:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
1991 560SEL AMG "Jap spec" 1989 560SEL Euro spec
|
|
#34
10-17-2008, 09:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
He means locked. You will notice no gains with it off but higher engine temps.
__________________
I'm not a doctor, but I'll have a look. '85 300SD 245k '87 300SDL 251k '90 300SEL 326k Six others from BMW, GM, and Ford. Liberty will not descend to a people; a people must raise themselves to liberty.[/IMG]
|
|
#35
10-22-2008, 12:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
MY BOSCH ELECTRIC FAN'S SET UP IS GREAT AND WORK'S PERFECT, ILL MAKE A MOVIE AND TAKE PICTURES THIS WEEKEND FOR YOU GUYS!
OK now the next post will be about all the parts i am ordering tomorrow, you guys are going to say that i am nut, but i don't care i am changing everything even if it does not need to be changed. I want everything to be in a Showroom state. So Tomorrow morning i am ordering all new parts, oil pan's , fuel line/cigar hose, front suspension(coil springs, Shocks, sway bar bushings, control arms, lower ball joints and others), steering( new complete tie rod tie rod end connecting rod, center connecting rod and others) NEW brakes all around 4 Brembo disc's, 2 sets of Pagid brake pads, 4 new calipers, 4 new front wheel bearings, new deeper auto trans oil pan, front and rear sub frame mounts, new rear shocks, 4 Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5 winter studded tires, and more...... this is going to be a big amount of cash/parts going into the 300SD once again!   I should be done soon....
__________________
1991 560SEL AMG "Jap spec" 1989 560SEL Euro spec Last edited by MBdieselFreak; 10-24-2008 at 12:05 AM.
|
|
#37
10-26-2008, 12:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
wow whats the point to post stuff here...... to get b*tched at ??? for no reason? i was going to put new pic's and detail of my car's, but is it worth it?? Well if you know-it-all guys out there think they are so great, what the hell are you doing on this site? You should be inventing a Time Machine since you think your so much superior! J*rk's
if you do not like some thread's don't read them! your a waste of my time... For the other normal, cool forum members i apologize, for these pointless stupid comment's on behalf of the Smartest people of the universe. (JimmyL and babymog) Wish them luck....
__________________
1991 560SEL AMG "Jap spec" 1989 560SEL Euro spec
|
|
#38
10-26-2008, 01:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Alright now that the j*rk's are taken care of lets get back to work......
__________________
1991 560SEL AMG "Jap spec" 1989 560SEL Euro spec
|
|
#39
10-27-2008, 02:04 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wait, you're doing all this work for the car to be in "a showroom state", then you're gonna drive it in the snow/winter?
What?
|
|
#40
10-27-2008, 08:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah dude isn't that crazy? i know, i know, but anyways i am painting and rustproofing the under side of the car... anyways ill post pics........
Quote:
__________________
1991 560SEL AMG "Jap spec" 1989 560SEL Euro spec
|
|
#41
10-30-2008, 01:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
99 E300 Turbodiesel 100k
|
|
#42
10-30-2008, 05:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reality usually is.
Thats why a 400hp V8 will always beat a 400hp turbo-4 in the same vehicle weight range.
|
|
#43
10-30-2008, 08:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
torque = tau(torque vector) = r(position vector) cross F(force vector) Power(scalar) = tau(torque vector) dot omega(angular velocity vector) means: torque is a "twisting" force power is a quantity dependent on that force and the rotational speed in other words, power is the "twist" times the "speed of twisting" The reason a 400hp V8 beats a 400hp I4 is that the I4's peak torque happens at higher omega (rotational speed, rpm), or in terms of position, further down the track, therefore its quarter-mile time is greater due to its lower acceleration. Yes, the I4 has "less torque" but that doesn't complete the story. If you were to make a really big I4 with similar displacement to the V8, you could probably beat it. The reason the quote is offensive is that it doesn't tell a good story.
__________________
99 E300 Turbodiesel 100k
|
|
#44
10-30-2008, 08:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nope, thats wrong because the large 4-banger couldn't turn fast enough to make 400hp quickly.
|
|
#45
11-01-2008, 09:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
[/quote]The reason the quote is offensive is that it doesn't tell a good story.[/quote]
How the heck, is that offensive? its only the truth.... By the way to make a good comparison, take a I4 (or any engine)with 250lbs of torque/125 HP and a I4 with 250HP/125lbs of torque. The engine with more torque will easily, beat the HP one just because it always has Brute Force fast, no need to rev high... so to win a race or climb a hill you need torque! A car with lot's of torque, will beat a ricer hp car, all day long and can work harder longer.
__________________
1991 560SEL AMG "Jap spec" 1989 560SEL Euro spec
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
