![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Perhaps this might be the solution to the u joint problem.
![]() ![]() Pictures are from : http://www.paulspruell.com/gearbox_instructions.html
__________________
190E 3.0-24v (M104 980) turbo @ 0.8 bar 1/4 mile: 2.483 / 13.540 / 175.17 km/h (street tires) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
That might be beneficial for protection of the flex disc from roadway damage but I don't see how it would help the u-joint.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
^ Ditto. Unneeded protection. But by the vary nature it flexes, hence the name. This would not stop that and you would not want it to.
The only u-joint problem I am aware of would be people installing inferior brands. Is there another that calls for this?
__________________
1991 560 SEL / 185k miles 1992 750il / 17k miles - project car |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
These cups stiffen the rubber flex joint for high power applications so it does not tear out. And it looks like a safety mechanism to prevent the disc from allowing the drive shaft to become decoupled if the disc fails.
Over in BMW / Caddy CTS land, they are using an aluminum disc with individual poly bushings, not sure how well it works. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|