![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
That website was just what google found for 2jzgte.
Im interested to see figures from other flow bench for M103 and 104 heads. If possible could you write them here in this topic? My flow bench figures is tested in 10" of water, and that 28" field is actually calculated by program, so... lets not belive its absolute right. ![]() Oh.. and i didnt say supra head is good, but in some videos it sounds just nice whith big turbo. ![]() Last edited by kynsi; 02-28-2010 at 02:23 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
1993 190E 2.6 Sportline |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Comparing Toyota and Merc Iv been thinking about same thing. Keeping the stroke 80.25 and still having 3 litre 24v turbo . M 104 also have little bit bigger valves...
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
It also has a larger bore spacing, IIRC a larger coolant area in the block, a chain driven set of cams, bigger head bolts, and a better rod/stroke ratio...
__________________
1993 190E 2.6 Sportline |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|