KirkVining |
11-12-2004 04:59 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by narwhal
Well Kirk, I still disagree with your treason theory, but see the logic of the rest of your response. Thanks for the civil response by the way ;)
I can tell you from first hand experience, that in my state, there aren't many loopholes. Last year, a prominent chicken processor was busted to the tune of millions of dollars for knowingly using illegal labor. I never argued against stricter enforcement on hiring illegals--I am all for that, but differ with you in thinking that jail time is appropriate for that crime and that it constitues treason. As German Star pointed out, it does not constitute treason under the current definition of the law.
|
Oh, I agree with you that it does not meet the legal definition - I think the law needs to be changed so that it does, because it certainly meets the conceptual definition.
I wonder if the chicken processor is the same company I was talking about that employeess 22,000 illegals in Texas. States treat illegals differently - in New Hampshire and most of the other big union states, the local cops bust them, and they languish in state jails until the feds come get them, sometimes for months. Considering that Northern cops and jailers are union guys, they make sure they have a very unpleasant time, and the word gets around among them to stay out of New Hampshire.
Here in Texas, its all about not being my job to arrest them - its the feds that have to do it. Nobody GAS.
As far as jail time goes, you know as well as I do that if CEOs are looking at going to the pokey then they will spend the money and time to make sure it doesn't happen. I'm sure lots of them are rethinking their accounting practices right now.
|