PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/)
-   Off-Topic Discussion (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/off-topic-discussion/)
-   -   First overtly political thread from the left. Is hiring Illegal Aliens Treason? (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/off-topic-discussion/107655-first-overtly-political-thread-left-hiring-illegal-aliens-treason.html)

mikemover 11-12-2004 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tkamiya
Well, Kirk.... I agree the INS could have handled the siuation alot better. There is no reason to punish children in that manner.

With that said, the whole situation would not have ocurred if, parents didn't choose to come to this country illegally and/or if US didn't allow them to stay here so long that they could establish family.

Even with those tragic situations, the fact remains, they (parents) do not have the right to be here, work here, or live here under the current law. With that said (for the second time), that's one of the worst handling of the situation by INS....

I agree with you guys about that being a tragic situation.

But the parents were ENTIRELY at fault for the situation. They put themselves and their kids in such jeopardy by being here illegally and trying to raise a family here illegally. It was very irresponsible for them to put their children at risk of ending up in such a heartbreaking predicament. I feel very sorry for the children, who are obviously not at fault, but I don't feel sorry for the parents one damn bit.

Mike

Jason Beal 11-13-2004 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by California Beach
Cheap Labor?

I don't see that anymore. Illegals are getting top dollar these days and they want all cash which means Uncle Sam doesn't get it's share.
They are stressing our systems and costing US tax payers more than the savings any business is saving. In the long run, the picture looks bleak.

They get cash because they are illegal. The employer pays because it is cheaper in the long run and they don't have to pay as much per hour. Mexicans are great hagglers but I doubt they are commanding "top dollar".

Most legal Mexicans I have met are some of the hardest working as well, most having two jobs.

It is the people that employee the illegal aliens that are the problem IMO.

Corporations not paying their fair share of taxes, or none at all, is draining this country.

Botnst 11-13-2004 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by webwench
Laws against hiring illegals are not enforced because (1) they're difficult to enforce, and (2) there is pressure from employers not to enforce these laws. After all, if we didn't have illegals, our new construction would be far more expensive, as would produce at our grocery stores. It would probably have cost me twice as much to get my house painted a couple of years ago! So employers and consumers for the most part have no reason to complain and push for tighter enforcement, and neither do workers who would want those jobs because, well, most American citizens aren't after construction, landscaping, and agricultural jobs.

People like me get upset over H1-B visas and offshore labor outsourcing, but we'll hire a painting crew made up of non-English-speaking men to paint our houses and maintain our lawn -- one set of immigrants hurts us, and the other helps us.

Without getting into the politics of it, talking heads talk aboutillegal aliens and not illegal employers because it's the immigrants themselves who are most visible and least powerless in our society. There are also more prostitutes in jail on any given night than there are johns or pimps, I'd wager.

We also worry more about the immigrants in the last couple of years because of the national security issues involved -- the 9/11 terrorists were here illegally as well, either without visas or on expired or invalid student visas. So immigrants are an easy target.

Webbie, its amazing how similar our views are on this an occassionally other topics. I wonder if we'll be accused of being the same person? So far, and at different times, I've been accused of being MedMech, Plantman, MikeMover, MoparMike, and probably other's whose names escape me. Oh yeah, Spock and Rasputin. How could I forget? Maybe more. So far I think they'be all been male (or at least projected male personas). Maybe if I pi$$-off somebody else using similar reasoning as you, they'll make the connection that you are my female side, or I your male.

I think I'm having an identity crisis. Well, off to Blockbuster to rent a machinegun movie. Or maybe a Hugh Grant movie. Hmmm.

Hatterasguy 11-13-2004 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KirkVining
and another great historical wrong, the theft of half of Mexico by our fore-fathers. The Mexican War was one of the great wrongs of US history, .


This is where I differ from you. We paid them for that land after we beat their army. We also could have brought them into the Republic right then and their we took their capitol. But we pulled out.

KirkVining 11-13-2004 06:12 PM

We gave them jack. Half the US for 10 million? Even in today's dollars it was a pittance. Its too bad we didn't bring them in to the country, we wouldn't have the problems we have today - the reason we didn't was racism and the fact that slavery was prohibited in Mexico by the Pope. In addition, we invaded them, not vice versa. It was a big land grab by the strong from the weak. I think if you asked any historian, the consensus would be that what we did was wrong. It was not one of our good-guy wars.

Botnst 11-13-2004 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KirkVining
We gave them jack. Half the US for 10 million? Even in today's dollars it was a pittance. Its too bad we didn't bring them in to the country, we wouldn't have the problems we have today - the reason we didn't was racism and the fact that slavery was prohibited in Mexico by the Pope. In addition, we invaded them, not vice versa. It was a big land grab by the strong from the weak. I think if you asked any historian, the consensus would be that what we did was wrong. It was not one of our good-guy wars.

Better than what the French got for their real estate deal. Or the Russians for theirs. Or the indians for Manhattan.

Take home lesson: Don't get into real estate deals with Americans.

I think the point that Hat was trying to impress upon you is that we didn't have to buy it, having won it by force of arms. Its like say, conquering a nation. You can colonize it, like we did the various indian entities or you can help them become free and independent nations like Germany, Japan, Italy, S. Korea, Philipines, etc.

Hatterasguy 11-13-2004 06:56 PM

So we wanted the land more than them. We didn't have to be good sports and pay them for it, it wasn't half of the country it was a few states.

Where did Ab Lincoln stand on this issue?

KirkVining 11-13-2004 07:22 PM

Is this a trivia thing ? He was against it.

mikemover 11-14-2004 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Botnst
Webbie, its amazing how similar our views are on this an occassionally other topics. I wonder if we'll be accused of being the same person? So far, and at different times, I've been accused of being MedMech, Plantman, MikeMover, MoparMike, and probably other's whose names escape me. Oh yeah, Spock and Rasputin. How could I forget? Maybe more. So far I think they'be all been male (or at least projected male personas). Maybe if I pi$$-off somebody else using similar reasoning as you, they'll make the connection that you are my female side, or I your male.

I think I'm having an identity crisis. Well, off to Blockbuster to rent a machinegun movie. Or maybe a Hugh Grant movie. Hmmm.

Hahaha...

Somebody already has accused webwench of being TXBill! :rolleyes: :D

Mike

webwench 11-14-2004 04:09 PM

I figure that when online people start accusing me of actually being a man, I must be getting somewhere :D

It happens a lot, generally when (1) someone finds themselves unable to refute the content of my posts and is therefore looking for the right buttons to push for a personal attack, or (2) someone is having their mental image of women being less-than-bright and interested primarily in cookie- and baby-baking shattered, and can't handle it. Either way, I take it as an inadvertent compliment.

mikemover 11-14-2004 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by webwench
......... Either way, I take it as an inadvertent compliment.

And you should! :D

I love it when someone like that abandons their legless argument and resorts to name-calling and/or ridiculous accusations!

I just stop and think "Ahhh.....the sweet smell of victory." :D

Mike

GermanStar 11-14-2004 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikemover

I love it when someone like that abandons their legless argument and resorts to name-calling and/or ridiculous accusations!

I just stop and think "Ahhh.....the sweet smell of victory." :D

Mike

Careful now -- KV's head will begin to swell. :D

The Warden 11-14-2004 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KirkVining
The unification of the US and Mexico is inevitable. Its already occurred in my opinion. They are on their way to becoming the majority in this country, and once they are, the official unification will occur. We actually would both benefit from it - they have lots of oil and unexplored oil potential, and despite the rampant crime the majority, decent Mexican people are a highly moral people who value family above all else, which is one of the things that makes them such good workers and such a good fit in American society. They desperately need an American style system of justice, and they know it, which is one of the reasons I believe they would do it in a heart beat - the majority of Mexicans would do anything to get out from under the yoke of the corrupt politicians, police and gangs that rule Mexico. It would also right two great wrongs - one the denial of democractic rights like the right to representation when subject to taxation, and another great historical wrong, the theft of half of Mexico by our fore-fathers. The Mexican War was one of the great wrongs of US history, and in many ways, the sympathy I feel for these people is that this used to be their land and in many ways they have as much right to be here as I do. They are not exactly foreigners, in fact many of them are also descended from Indians who fled our genocidal massacres of these people. Indian cuture survived in Mexico because the Pope forbed the murder and enslavement of them, which is why there are millions of Indians in Mexcio and only a few hundred thousand here in the States. I would say that the great majority of Mexicans that come here are descended from those Indians - in other words they are our own people coming back.

Kirk, how do you think nationalism comes into play regarding Mexico annexing itself to the U.S.? Also, if we did gain Mexico, it seems to me that drastic steps would be necessary to rid the Mexican states of the criminals currently entrenched therein...is this fight truly worth it?

Also, while murder and enslavement of natives in Spanish Mexico was officially condemned by the Catholic Church, that doesn't mean it didn't happen. I'm sure you know about the mission system and how kind it was to the native population :rolleyes:

While there are Mexicans descended from native Americans who fled the U.S. Army, I'm pretty sure the vast majority are descended from Aztecs (or cross-breeding between Aztecs and Spaniards).

BTW, IIRC, the Mexican-American War was actually the first place where Lincoln gained any national attention, due to his vocal opposition to it. Another noteworthy oppoent was Henry Davis Thoreau, who decided to stop paying taxes because he didn't want to help fund what he considered an unjust war. He also spent some quality time in jail for that...and, while saying that we got half of Mexico's land in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hildago is exaggerating some, I don't think it's exaggerating to say that we got 1/3 of Mexico's land area...keep in mind that, while "a few states" may be technically correct, those "few states" still include pretty much everything south and west of the Lousiana Purchase terriroty except for Texas and a small chunk of New Mexico that was purchased later in the 19th Century for a railroad right-of-way (I believe that's known as the Gasden Purchase, but the name may be wrong). I suppose saying that we gave them $10 million is better than just conquering the land and calling it good, but it does seem to me that that's on par with giving the natives a string of beads for the island that Manhattan now resides on. But...the Mexican-American War is still something we instigated, fought, and humiliated Mexico and certainly didn't do our image any good...and for what? Monroe primarily wanted California (and, therefore, the realization of Manifest Destiny by having a state on the Pacific Coast), and the residents of CA at the time were about ready to follow Texas's lead in any event...had we waited a few more years, we could probably have gotten California without a fight (at least not on the part of the U.S.), and I don't think Mexico cared all that much about the other regions the U.S. got (certainly not to the degree that they cared about Alta California).

Sorry to go off on a tangent, but historical debates always get me geared up :D

Botnst 11-14-2004 06:37 PM

"The Warden", I think you've got it from a objective sort of Mexican point of view. That's the neat thing about history, everybody knows that something happened, but how we understand that 'something' depends on what we bring to understand it.

One of the finest political essays ever written was that which Thoreau wrote during is brief time in the local cárce, "On Civil Disobedience". Its as revolutionary and institutionally dangerous as the Declaration of Independence or Sermon on the Mount. I understand that both Ghandi and Mandela used it as justification for their own political activism.

To me, the war with Mexico and the war with Spain are the two least justifiable wars in which we've ever engaged. Vietnam is a distant third.

Oh well, too bad the Mexicans didn't kick our ass like the Canadians did when we invaded them. Twice, right? How embarassing.

webwench 11-14-2004 06:42 PM

What? We invaded the Canadians?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website