Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-19-2004, 10:35 AM
boneheaddoctor's Avatar
Senior Benz fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hells half acre (Great Falls, Virginia)
Posts: 16,007
Oil for corruption, or How the UN rips us all off.

Oil For Corruption?
Posted October 8, 2004
By Ed Feulner

The cover-up is always worse than the crime, they say. But that doesn't necessarily hold true when you're dealing with the crime of the century -- in fact, two centuries. And the U.N. oil-for-food program is among the largest criminal enterprises in history.

Over the course of several years, the U.S. Government Accountability Office estimates Saddam Hussein's Iraqi dictatorship generated more than $10 billion in illegal revenues by exploiting oil-for-food.

Members of the United Nations seem to have been deeply involved in the scandal. For example, Benon Sevan, once the executive director of oil-for-food, was included on an Iraqi Oil Ministry listing of hundreds of people who allegedly received oil vouchers as bribes from Saddam's regime.

As such details have dribbled out, the United Nations has reacted
predictably -- by attempting to sweep oil-for-food under the rug or change the subject. For example, the U.N. commission of inquiry, headed by former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, has been at work for almost six months. But it doesn't seem to be making progress.

And that's not surprising -- the commission seems to have been set up to fail. As Heritage Foundation experts Nile Gardiner and James Phillips reported recently, it has "no subpoena power and is clearly open to U.N. manipulation. It bears no enforcement authority (such as contempt) to
compel compliance with its requests for information and has no authority to discipline or punish any wrongdoing it discovers."

The Volcker Commission's operations are shrouded in secrecy. We know who the top-level investigators are, for example, but there are some 40 other officials who remain unidentified. These are the people who will be handling documents, interviewing witnesses and gathering evidence.

In other words, those doing the real work. These people must be independent -- but since we don't know who they are, we don't know whether any (or
all) of them have close ties to the United Nations.

One key commission official already has resigned because serious doubts were raised about her fair-mindedness. Volcker's spokeswoman, Anna Di Lellio, stepped down Sept. 24, after The Heritage Foundation highlighted one of her past anti-U.S. statements.

"I don't like it that the two nations whose citizenship I hold, Italy and the U.S., have leased their institutions to a couple of families," Di Lellio told the London newspaper The Guardian on the first anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. "With defenders like W and Berlusconi (U.S. President George Bush and Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi) largely unchecked by a sycophantic media, who needs bin Laden to destroy culture, personal freedom, respect for other human beings, integrity and the rule of law?"

In accepting her resignation, Volcker admitted that such a statement "could impair your ability to act with full effectiveness as liaison of the committee with the press and public."

That's an understatement. Such views may play well at the United
Nations, but they won't go over well in Iraq, where polls show most people are thankful for the U.S.-led coalition that ousted Saddam last year. And they certainly won't be popular in Congress or the Bush administration. The commission must work with all three groups to do its job.

Meanwhile, even as the Volcker Commission languished, U.N.
Secretary-General Kofi Annan tried to change the subject. He recently told the BBC the war with Iraq was "illegal" under the U.N. Charter.

It makes sense Annan would rather make such a ridiculous charge than talk about oil-for-food. His son, Kojo, was a consultant for a company that later won a questionable $4.8 million U.N. contract. Plus, the United Nations has completed at least 55 confidential internal oil-for-food investigations. Annan ought to release all those reports, so we'll know what he knew and when he knew it.

The world deserves a full and fair investigation of oil-for-food. If any U.N. officials engaged in wrongdoing, they should be fired and prosecuted under U.S. or Iraqi law.

But we won't get that investigation unless we keep up the pressure. Congress must make sure a United Nations cover-up doesn't obscure a $10 billion crime scene.

Ed Feulner is president of The Heritage Foundation, a Washington-based conservative public policy research institute.

__________________
Proud owner of ....
1971 280SE W108
1979 300SD W116
1983 300D W123
1975 Ironhead Sportster chopper
1987 GMC 3/4 ton 4X4 Diesel
1989 Honda Civic (Heavily modified)
---------------------
Section 609 MVAC Certified
---------------------
"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2018 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page