Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-10-2005, 12:08 PM
boneheaddoctor's Avatar
Senior Benz fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hells half acre (Great Falls, Virginia)
Posts: 16,007
Biased Hrricane coverage by the media

Is it just me or does the news coverage seem to make it seem like the only hurricane victims are black and live only in New Orleans? I rarely even hear a mention of anything outside of New Orleans...where is the Gulfport coverage, in fact anything in Missisippi.

Where is th enews coverage on the Balance of that 90,000 square miles that were effected....many parts far worse than New Orleans was.
__________________
Proud owner of ....
1971 280SE W108
1979 300SD W116
1983 300D W123
1975 Ironhead Sportster chopper
1987 GMC 3/4 ton 4X4 Diesel
1989 Honda Civic (Heavily modified)
---------------------
Section 609 MVAC Certified
---------------------
"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche

Last edited by boneheaddoctor; 09-10-2005 at 03:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-10-2005, 01:20 PM
MTI's Avatar
MTI MTI is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 10,626
Yeah, what about all the other properties in NYC that were destroyed on 9/11 . . it's all Twin Towers this, Twin Towers that . . . sheesh. And, you'd think that it was only Aceh or ****et that was struck by the tsunami . . . damn you, biased American media . . .
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-10-2005, 01:46 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
You raise an excellent point, Bone.

And, I wish to crucify the news media with their own data, which you were so kind to post.

You mention 90,000 square miles. Do you fellows realize how large this is?

You would need a swath of destruction from the shoreline to 90 miles inland, for 1000 miles in length to equal 90,000 square miles.

No offense to you personally Bone, but the data is absorbed by the public, hook line and sinker, and it is off by a factor of 38X. I calculate that the maximum amount of destruction that would be possible is 2,350 square miles.

This is nothing new for the media. I remember when the Exxon Valdez spilled 11 million gallons of oil. The media reported it as 11 million barrells. No big deal. They were off by a factor of 42X.

See a pattern here?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-10-2005, 02:54 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: los angeles area
Posts: 1,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton

. They were off by a factor of 42X.

See a pattern here?
Ahhh, so they've been improving lately

I dont know when some of you are gonna get it, I have been repeating it over and over, the TV news and most of the other media outlets are NOT NEWS, they are entertainment.

You have to find factual news elsewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-10-2005, 03:11 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by luvrpgrl
Ahhh, so they've been improving lately

I dont know when some of you are gonna get it, I have been repeating it over and over, the TV news and most of the other media outlets are NOT NEWS, they are entertainment.

You have to find factual news elsewhere.
I agree. Now that's twice.

But, I find it a bit frightening that the average man in the street gets his information from these outlets, and he believes it.

Bonehead, who is by no means the average man, reported the erroneous fact several times on this forum without so much as a thought.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-10-2005, 03:29 PM
boneheaddoctor's Avatar
Senior Benz fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hells half acre (Great Falls, Virginia)
Posts: 16,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton
I agree. Now that's twice.

But, I find it a bit frightening that the average man in the street gets his information from these outlets, and he believes it.

Bonehead, who is by no means the average man, reported the erroneous fact several times on this forum without so much as a thought.
Well thats what THEY say... but I figue a 500 mile section of beachfront realestate got blasted hard and heavy, and honestly have no idea how far inland......Bridgeport MS got blasted far wors than New Orleans... The news showed a 250 mile radius from the center of the storm.

The Gulf Region is not my stomping ground but any idiot wo watched the satellite pictures knows New Orleans didn't get the brunt and they were by far not the only ones effected...

Coverage of other areas has been extremely spotty at best......

Is it becasue THOSE areas are predominately white...and the liberal pres wants to play the race card claiming its the blacks who were disporportionatly effected...and the only way that would work was to totally ignore everyone outside New Orleans?

Think about it....who is blaming Bush...who is claiming reponse was racialy based...and who is refusing to cover harder hit areas (white areas) to bolster those claims....knowing most of us in the USA wil only see what we are shown.

Think about it..too many coincidences....and too much Bush bashing for this to be a coincidence. Its been carefully orchastrated by the left to keep coverage limited to bolster false partisan claims against Bush.
__________________
Proud owner of ....
1971 280SE W108
1979 300SD W116
1983 300D W123
1975 Ironhead Sportster chopper
1987 GMC 3/4 ton 4X4 Diesel
1989 Honda Civic (Heavily modified)
---------------------
Section 609 MVAC Certified
---------------------
"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-10-2005, 05:06 PM
GermanStar's Avatar
Annelid wrangler
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Fountain Hills, AZ
Posts: 4,932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton
I agree. Now that's twice.
You can take stuff for that, you know....
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-10-2005, 03:42 PM
MS Fowler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Littlestown PA ( 6 miles south of Gettysburg)
Posts: 2,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by luvrpgrl
Ahhh, so they've been improving lately

I dont know when some of you are gonna get it, I have been repeating it over and over, the TV news and most of the other media outlets are NOT NEWS, they are entertainment.

You have to find factual news elsewhere.
If they were "only" entertainment.
The media is made of people who " want to make a difference"--hence they have an agenda. They are propagandists for their particular form of "bigger government is good". I wish they were viewed as mere entertainment.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-10-2005, 05:56 PM
Emmerich's Avatar
M-100's in Dallas
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton
You raise an excellent point, Bone.

And, I wish to crucify the news media with their own data, which you were so kind to post.

You mention 90,000 square miles. Do you fellows realize how large this is?

You would need a swath of destruction from the shoreline to 90 miles inland, for 1000 miles in length to equal 90,000 square miles.

No offense to you personally Bone, but the data is absorbed by the public, hook line and sinker, and it is off by a factor of 38X. I calculate that the maximum amount of destruction that would be possible is 2,350 square miles.
If you drew a semi circle with New Orleans as center, you would only need one with a radius of 239 miles to get 90,000 square miles. And in reality the circle would need to be less since doing it this way has removed all the land mass south of New Orleans for the whole state. This circle would run just west of the Texas border and to Pensacola in the east and North of Jackson in Mississippi. They must be counting anything that got hit by rain..
__________________
MB-less
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-10-2005, 11:15 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emmerich
They must be counting anything that got hit by rain..
Exactly. But, if you listen to them, they continually use the "90,000 square mile" figure when referring to the damage from the storm. It's complete and total BS. The amount of destruction is something close to 1/40 th of this value, and may even be less!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Im ready to BARF at these liberals who.... luvrpgrl Off-Topic Discussion 165 09-06-2005 03:03 PM
Kerry Phones Swift Boat Foes (begging For A Ceasefire) ericdee Off-Topic Discussion 9 08-25-2004 06:39 PM
Computer Shopping adiaw83 Off-Topic Discussion 14 07-08-2004 07:00 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page