Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-21-2005, 12:25 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 495
Linux Rant

Quite recently I bought an AMD64 based PC, fully loaded up with WinXP Pro SP2 Media Edition, and all the goodies- the best high end machine I could find in my area at a decent price. I was, and still am amazed at how snappin' quick and stable this rig is, even though it's running 32 bit Windows in a 64 bit environment. So, I thought that if I could get my hands on a 64 bit OS, it would really make it sing. WRONG!!!

I managed to download the 5 CD set of Fedora Core-4 64 Bit ( which was quite a feat in itself), then had to download a special patch recommended by Microsoft so as to "explode" these ISO-wrapped CD's. Now I was in business.

First try- installed Fedora with the PC "in situ", that is, downstairs where my entertainment gear is, not upstairs with my DSL Modem and Belkin Router. The new PC connects via a USB connected LinkSys Wireless-G adapter which the PC dealer threw in for free to sweeten the deal. So the first thing I had to do was to get Linux to connect over that adapter. Well, it turns out that there ain't no driver for it, nowhere, no-how. So, I brought everything upstairs so I could wire-connect it to the router- no problem with this of course, as Linux recognized the on-board VIA ethernet driver.

So, I ended up with a clean install, and then ran a complete "yum" upgrade. This worked flawlessly, although by now I was starting to notice that Fedora Core 4-64 is noticably slower than Windows XP. With Win, the bootup time is about half that of Linux, and the desktop just snaps into place. The Linux KDE just kind of opens up with several "jerks". Kind of disappointing.

So now I wanted to try using a few things. First- net-surfing with Mozilla. not bad, but noticably slower and jerkier than Mozilla on Windows. Next- see how well Fedora handles music. There are a few music player packages included with the distro, and the default seemingly is a thing called "Noatrun". Well, I downloaded some MP-3's from my little Creative Labs MuVo, and tried to play them. First thing Noatrun tells me is that the "MP3 Plug-in is not installed". WTF? The most common type of music file isn't already loaded? So I tried another package called simply- "Music Player". Again, no go, so I opened up a dialog to configure it. Here, MP3 isn't even a choice! All it's good for is CD Audio, WAV and Ogg-Vorbis! I went back to Noatrun, opened the configuration diaog, and even though it had said "MP3 not installed", it doesn't appear to provide any direct way to install a plug-in of any kind.

So next, I put a DVD loaded with a bunch of WAV files I had recorded from my vinyl collection into the DVD multi-drive. Nothing happened. Oh yeah- this is Linux- ya gotta "mount" everything. So I right clicked "mount", then all the files appeared. OK, so now let's see if Noatrun will play these. I browsed it through to my WAV folder, clicked "select all" and then "play". Noatrun tried to start, but then immdiately stopped. Damn! Well, what about a plain old Audio CD? I pushed the eject button on the DVD drive. Nothing happened. Oh yeah, this is Linux- ya gotta unmount everything. So I clicked "unmount". Disked stopped spinning. THen I pressed the eject button again. Nothing happened. Oh yeah- this is Linux... so I right clicked the Icon, clicked on eject and out came my WAV DVD, and in went my Patsy Cline plain ol' CD. The Icon displayed a little music note beside it, then started to play. Great- so at least Linux is a CD player. So, enough of Patsy- let's see if my WAV files work now. I pressed the eject button- whoops, almost forgot- right click, then eject. I put the WAV disk back in, mounted it, then opened Noatrun and clicked on "Play". And guess what it played? Patsy Cline!!! Patsy wasn't even in the player, but she crooned on anyhow! I tried stopping the player, opened the play-list and clicked on one of my WAV files. This time, I saw the selector move down the list all by itself, right back to Patsy. Now I'm geting it- Linus Torvoold is a real Patsy Cline fan!

Finally, I tried to see if Music Player would play my WAV's. This time I transferred all the WAV files to a HD folder and imported that into Music Player. It showed all the file names but they were all greyed out, and simply would not play. I tried Noatrun again, after deleting Patsy Cline off the list, pointed it to my WAV folder. This time it found all the WAV files- they were not grayed out, so I simply pointed the mouse to one of the files, then clicked on "Play". Again, it tried to start, but immediately stopped.

So what's going on here guys? I know Linux isn't necessarily easy, but c'mon- this is pretty basic stuff. With Win XP, everything just works, and works well. Why can't Linux now be the same after all these years? Am I missing something here?

Dave

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-21-2005, 12:38 PM
MedMech
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The Linux community is slipping many are moving to full Apple or FreeBSD. When my Linux box crashes or dies I don't think I'm going to bother doing anything with it other than load win 2000 pro or FreeBSD.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-21-2005, 12:40 PM
diametricalbenz's Avatar
The Crowbar of Embriage
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,511
That is dissapointing but I bet the XP system will crash sooner than a Fedora run system

Try VLC, this is the best player I have seen.

http://www.videolan.org/vlc
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-21-2005, 12:41 PM
MedMech
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I use Linux for covert stuff but I've found that I can do even more with OS X. In fact I can do much more I think I've welded a NIC card or two on the receiving end by accident
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-21-2005, 12:50 PM
Ashman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 4,749
if you havent already seen this. check it out...

www.osx86project.org

Mac osx running on pc platform.

I have it triple booting on my computer at home.

I run XP pro, Ubuntu Linux and osx.

Osx runs ok, not bad, some things don't work, but overall its just fun to play with.

Ubuntu linux is cool, I like it, but I still stick to xp most of the time.

I only installed linux and osx because I could and wanted to play with them...

Sounds like you have a nice machine, I am sure it will love a true 64 bit OS that works properly.

Alon
__________________
'92 300CE - Sold
2004 C240 - 744 - C7 Wheels - Android Radio
2002 C320 - 816 - Sport Wagon
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-21-2005, 01:53 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashman
if you havent already seen this. check it out...

www.osx86project.org

Mac osx running on pc platform.

Sounds like you have a nice machine, I am sure it will love a true 64 bit OS that works properly.

Alon
I knew about Apple's move to Intel, but was not aware of osx86 activity. Thanks for the link but I think after a quick read, it's not something I'd be interested in. For me, the PC is a means to an end, not a hobby. And since Microsoft has been so slow off the line with 64 bit, and when and if it comes out stable it will be priced in the stratosphere. I just wish there would come along an affordable (doesn't have to be free) and stable 64 bit OS that would make the most of my hardware. Maybe I'll give FreeBSD a whirl, I did manage to download and extract the ISO's, but my understanding is that all the "extras" like the Desktop, etc. have to be obtained from other sources, and user-compiled. Too deep and time consuming for me, as I do have this '76 Benz to keep on the road

Priorities

Dave M.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-21-2005, 02:32 PM
Bill Wood's Avatar
Retired Webmaster
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Johns Creek, GA, USA
Posts: 5,013
Desktop vs Server

I love Linux for server applications. MercedesShop has run on Linux since 1999. It is solid.
Fastlane runs on Windows Server 2003. So far my experience with that has been pretty good but, time will tell.

For desktop applications I prefer Windows XP. I think Windows XP is the best desktop operating system that Microsoft has ever produced.
Linux just doesn't come close to XP on the desktop. I would rather use Win2000 than Linux.
__________________
Bill Wood - Retired Webmaster
My Personal Website
1998 Mercedes E430
2010 Toyota Sequoia
My Photo Albums
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-21-2005, 06:30 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 437
fedora??? well thats your problem, i HAD redhat (fedora is based on redhat) for a while, and it was faster than winxp, because I'm a tweak freak with my computer, and i had run out of line in winxp, but could go so much further with redhat, but it still wasn't snappy, took over 50seconds to bootup, i can't deal with that!! so i got gentoo linux, it BLOWS REDHAT OUT OF THE WATER!!! under 20sec bootup, optimized for MY computer not a 10 year old 386 like redhat did, it was (and still is 3 years later) blazing fast, windows explorer took over 2seconds to load, konqueror takes under 1 second on my machine!!
heres my system specs if you want to know:
athlon xp 2500+ barton core
biostar m7ncd mother board (NFORCE2 chipset)
512mb ddr2700 (333mhz)
nvidia geforce 256 32mb (yes its a old card in a new computer)
seagate 27gb harddrive 7200rpm rated at 66mb/sec true transfer 48mb/sec
gentoo linux, kernel mm-sources-2.6.7-rc2
nvidia video driver, gcc-3.4.3
redhat (fedora) is a old yugo, and gentoo is a new Ferrari enzo in terms of performance, if you want a fast pc, windows is not the solution, nor is fedora, ideally you need to build the entire system from scratch (with gentoo its called a stage1)
__________________
1982 300D (w123, "Grey Car")
1982 300D (w123, "Blue Car")
2001 Ford F150 "Clifford" (The Big Red Truck)
1997 Dodge Ram 2500 12V Cummins
1996 Dodge Ram 2500 12V Cummins
Previous Vehicles:
1995 E300D, 1980 300SD, 1992 Buick Century, 2005 Saturn Ion
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-21-2005, 09:38 PM
iwrock's Avatar
roflmonster
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hella NorCal
Posts: 3,313
Hmm....

I load Xp Pro in approximately 18 seconds....

Then Again, I have a fully tuned/tweaked machine.

AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ @3.2 Ghz
2 Gigs Memory in dual channel (@2-3-2-5)
Dual 6800 Ultra OC's in SLi (saving for 7800's)
Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS Platinum
2x 74 GIG 10,000 RPM hard drives in Raid 0
2x 300 GIG 7200 hard drives
Dual Layer DVD
__________________
-Justin

91 560 SEC AMG - other dogs dd
01 Honda S2000 - dogs dd
07 MB ML320 CDI - dd
16 Lexus IS250 - wifes dd

it's automatic.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-21-2005, 11:14 PM
DrJ DrJ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by coldwar
Maybe I'll give FreeBSD a whirl, I did manage to download and extract the ISO's, but my understanding is that all the "extras" like the Desktop, etc. have to be obtained from other sources, and user-compiled.
Dave M.
Not so. You can install from either source or binaries in FreeBSD. Source is usually more convenient to upgrade, but binaries do help for the monsters like Gnome (or KDE) and OO.o. All of these are available from ports (see the FreeBSD site, or ask another question here).

I also don't understand the issue with boot times. I boot FreeBSD only when I have upgraded the OS (the kernel, userland and ports), and only since I am using the 6.0 branch at the moment is that more than a couple of times a year. Otherwise, it just keeps running and running and running...

The system is not perfect in the sense that Linux is not perfect: many applications are simply not available. But the core OS and many of the user programs are actually quite good for general-purpose desktop activities. I use it for the majority of my work, and that includes heavy-duty numerical and text processing. REALLY heavy duty, as in two-dimensional, time varying finite element analyses and complicated text (including chemical structures and the like) that would make Word choke.

There is a barrier to getting started with FreeBSD, as it is not particularly newbie friendly. It is all logical, thorough, and well-documented though, and once you get the hang of it, you won't want to leave.

For a user-friendly desktop installation, please check out PC-BSD or DesktopBSD. Both are FreeBSD with many helpful shortcuts for achieving a good desktop system. I know both systems and their developers, and can vouch for both.

DrJ
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-22-2005, 07:59 PM
MedMech
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Apparently my XP box is OS X friendly and I'm going to load the OSX86 this week.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-22-2005, 08:58 PM
Ashman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 4,749
Just remember witht he osx86 that some things will not work...

Video cards are 1 thing that is a big issue I know of only a few motherboards witht he right chipset to get the video adapter working perfectly..

Still runs fine for me to play with not to use..

There are a few versions of osx that can be downloaded.. I forget which one I have, but installing it want too hard, and once I figred out a couple of things it booted up just fine.

Alon
__________________
'92 300CE - Sold
2004 C240 - 744 - C7 Wheels - Android Radio
2002 C320 - 816 - Sport Wagon
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-22-2005, 09:24 PM
MedMech
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashman
Just remember witht he osx86 that some things will not work...

Video cards are 1 thing that is a big issue I know of only a few motherboards witht he right chipset to get the video adapter working perfectly..

Still runs fine for me to play with not to use..

There are a few versions of osx that can be downloaded.. I forget which one I have, but installing it want too hard, and once I figred out a couple of things it booted up just fine.

Alon
Are you using VM or boot? Where did you get the image for OSX? I checked my computer on the os x website and everything should work....


Getting a bit excited......
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-23-2005, 09:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rockville MD
Posts: 833
Micro$oft owns the workstation and desktop, but they are afraid as hell of Linux eating up the server market. IBM is staking its future on Linux servers, and I can say that Suse 8 & 9 are very solid. Sun is no longer seen as a threat to Microsoft.
__________________
1985 380SE Blue/Blue - 230,000 miles
2012 Subaru Forester 5-speed
2005 Toyota Sienna
2004 Chrysler Sebring convertible
1999 Toyota Tacoma
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-23-2005, 11:12 PM
iwrock's Avatar
roflmonster
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hella NorCal
Posts: 3,313
I am running OSx on my box. Still is a little bit choppy, but hell it runs. Right now, I am typing this on an OSxPC. IT is cool, but once I get the ATI drivers finalized, it all over. No more windoze for me. I used the "deadmoo" imgae to get mine all setup, and I had little to no problems getting it to work.

HAHAHA, If i get the ATI drivers loaded in, I think I may be trading the OSxPC for the shiny new G% my parents have.

__________________
-Justin

91 560 SEC AMG - other dogs dd
01 Honda S2000 - dogs dd
07 MB ML320 CDI - dd
16 Lexus IS250 - wifes dd

it's automatic.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page