Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-20-2005, 08:40 AM
PC Dave's Avatar
Low Maintenance
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Higher than You
Posts: 732
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst
I believe it was Orrin Hatch, though I may be wrong. He should've been jailed then. It's not too late now.

Bot
He's released CD's of his folk songs. You're more right than you can know.
__________________
81 300SD
08 MDX Tech
93 525i

05 F650GS
  #2  
Old 12-20-2005, 08:38 PM
boneheaddoctor's Avatar
Senior Benz fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hells half acre (Great Falls, Virginia)
Posts: 16,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Southernstar
I was just trying to think of a way that W can get out of this mess his in. Seems this time folks, ol' W, stepped over the line.
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash8.htm


CLINTON ADMINISTRATION SECRET SEARCH ON AMERICANS -- WITHOUT COURT ORDER

CARTER EXECUTIVE ORDER: 'ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE' WITHOUT COURT ORDER

Bill Clinton Signed Executive Order that allowed Attorney General to do searches without court approval

Clinton, February 9, 1995: "The Attorney General is authorized to approve physical searches, without a court order"

Jimmy Carter Signed Executive Order on May 23, 1979: "Attorney General is authorized to approve electronic surveillance to acquire foreign intelligence information without a court order."

WASH POST, July 15, 1994: Extend not only to searches of the homes of U.S. citizens but also -- in the delicate words of a Justice Department official -- to "places where you wouldn't find or would be unlikely to find information involving a U.S. citizen... would allow the government to use classified electronic surveillance techniques, such as infrared sensors to observe people inside their homes, without a court order."

Deputy Attorney General Jamie S. Gorelick, the Clinton administration believes the president "has inherent authority to conduct warrantless searches for foreign intelligence purposes."

Secret searches of Aldrich Ames's office and home in June and October 1993, both without a federal warrant.

END




Funny how the left wingers are suffering selective amnesia. Particularly the "Know it all" types like Charlie7 etc.........
__________________
Proud owner of ....
1971 280SE W108
1979 300SD W116
1983 300D W123
1975 Ironhead Sportster chopper
1987 GMC 3/4 ton 4X4 Diesel
1989 Honda Civic (Heavily modified)
---------------------
Section 609 MVAC Certified
---------------------
"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
  #3  
Old 12-20-2005, 08:46 PM
nkowi
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 452
Quote:
Originally Posted by boneheaddoctor
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash8.htm


CLINTON ADMINISTRATION SECRET SEARCH ON AMERICANS -- WITHOUT COURT ORDER

CARTER EXECUTIVE ORDER: 'ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE' WITHOUT COURT ORDER

Bill Clinton Signed Executive Order that allowed Attorney General to do searches without court approval

Clinton, February 9, 1995: "The Attorney General is authorized to approve physical searches, without a court order"

Jimmy Carter Signed Executive Order on May 23, 1979: "Attorney General is authorized to approve electronic surveillance to acquire foreign intelligence information without a court order."

WASH POST, July 15, 1994: Extend not only to searches of the homes of U.S. citizens but also -- in the delicate words of a Justice Department official -- to "places where you wouldn't find or would be unlikely to find information involving a U.S. citizen... would allow the government to use classified electronic surveillance techniques, such as infrared sensors to observe people inside their homes, without a court order."

Deputy Attorney General Jamie S. Gorelick, the Clinton administration believes the president "has inherent authority to conduct warrantless searches for foreign intelligence purposes."

Secret searches of Aldrich Ames's office and home in June and October 1993, both without a federal warrant.

END




Funny how the left wingers are suffering selective amnesia. Particularly the "Know it all" types like Charlie7 etc.........
Well, that settles it. Multiple wrongs (although bone's claims/sources are always, always, always quite dubious) do make a right. Sins of previous presidents are clear justification for Wubbya's alleged actions.
__________________
"Diplomacy is the art of saying 'nice doggie' until you can find a rock."
  #4  
Old 12-20-2005, 09:32 PM
Southernstar's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Birmingham Alabama
Posts: 196
Quote:
Originally Posted by boneheaddoctor
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash8.htm


CLINTON ADMINISTRATION SECRET SEARCH ON AMERICANS -- WITHOUT COURT ORDER

CARTER EXECUTIVE ORDER: 'ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE' WITHOUT COURT ORDER

Bill Clinton Signed Executive Order that allowed Attorney General to do searches without court approval

Clinton, February 9, 1995: "The Attorney General is authorized to approve physical searches, without a court order"

Jimmy Carter Signed Executive Order on May 23, 1979: "Attorney General is authorized to approve electronic surveillance to acquire foreign intelligence information without a court order."

WASH POST, July 15, 1994: Extend not only to searches of the homes of U.S. citizens but also -- in the delicate words of a Justice Department official -- to "places where you wouldn't find or would be unlikely to find information involving a U.S. citizen... would allow the government to use classified electronic surveillance techniques, such as infrared sensors to observe people inside their homes, without a court order."

Deputy Attorney General Jamie S. Gorelick, the Clinton administration believes the president "has inherent authority to conduct warrantless searches for foreign intelligence purposes."

Secret searches of Aldrich Ames's office and home in June and October 1993, both without a federal warrant.

END




Funny how the left wingers are suffering selective amnesia. Particularly the "Know it all" types like Charlie7 etc.........

That’s flatly false. The Clinton administration program, code-named Echelon, complied with FISA. Before any conversations of U.S. persons were targeted, a FISA warrant was obtained. CIA director George Tenet testified to this before Congress on 4/12/00:

I’m here today to discuss specific issues about and allegations regarding Signals Intelligence activities and the so-called Echelon Program of the National Security Agency…

There is a rigorous regime of checks and balances which we, the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency and the FBI scrupulously adhere to whenever conversations of U.S. persons are involved, whether directly or indirectly. We do not collect against U.S. persons unless they are agents of a foreign power as that term is defined in the law. We do not target their conversations for collection in the United States unless a FISA warrant has been obtained from the FISA court by the Justice Department.

Read and weep BDB!!
  #5  
Old 12-20-2005, 09:35 PM
boneheaddoctor's Avatar
Senior Benz fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hells half acre (Great Falls, Virginia)
Posts: 16,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Southernstar
That’s flatly false. The Clinton administration program, code-named Echelon, complied with FISA. Before any conversations of U.S. persons were targeted, a FISA warrant was obtained. CIA director George Tenet testified to this before Congress on 4/12/00:

I’m here today to discuss specific issues about and allegations regarding Signals Intelligence activities and the so-called Echelon Program of the National Security Agency…

There is a rigorous regime of checks and balances which we, the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency and the FBI scrupulously adhere to whenever conversations of U.S. persons are involved, whether directly or indirectly. We do not collect against U.S. persons unless they are agents of a foreign power as that term is defined in the law. We do not target their conversations for collection in the United States unless a FISA warrant has been obtained from the FISA court by the Justice Department.

Read and weep BDB!!
SO PROVE IT! rather than rant patently false information put forth by the DNC.....


WHAT LAW WAS violated.....and show proof how a president does not have that autority in time of war.....when its been proven they do....and what do the Democrat have to hide? Are they in League with AlQueda?

WHere is the cry for an investigation of leaks of goverment secrets during a time of war.....the left wingers care more about AlQueda and its supporters than they do for US law and US citizens.
__________________
Proud owner of ....
1971 280SE W108
1979 300SD W116
1983 300D W123
1975 Ironhead Sportster chopper
1987 GMC 3/4 ton 4X4 Diesel
1989 Honda Civic (Heavily modified)
---------------------
Section 609 MVAC Certified
---------------------
"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
  #6  
Old 12-20-2005, 09:50 PM
Southernstar's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Birmingham Alabama
Posts: 196
Look BDB obviously FISA is the law. Ok. Now, you may or may not know of this law. Which basically says that, yes the POTUS can order a suspects phone to be tapped in a time of war. PROVIDING, that within 72 hours of the wire tap, a showing is made to the FISA Court and then the Court will issue a wire tap.
Ok, now I know this is hard to grasp, but W can't just order this on his own and not get the Courts approval. He's not a King.
  #7  
Old 12-20-2005, 09:52 PM
boneheaddoctor's Avatar
Senior Benz fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hells half acre (Great Falls, Virginia)
Posts: 16,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Southernstar
Look BDB obviously FISA is the law. Ok. Now, you may or may not know of this law. Which basically says that, yes the POTUS can order a suspects phone to be tapped in a time of war. PROVIDING, that within 72 hours of the wire tap, a showing is made to the FISA Court and then the Court will issue a wire tap.
Ok, now I know this is hard to grasp, but W can't just order this on his own and not get the Courts approval. He's not a King.
what proof do you have procedures were not followed? Outside of any left wing organisations comments that is. And during a time of war the President does have sweeping powers that bush haters just throw fits over....
__________________
Proud owner of ....
1971 280SE W108
1979 300SD W116
1983 300D W123
1975 Ironhead Sportster chopper
1987 GMC 3/4 ton 4X4 Diesel
1989 Honda Civic (Heavily modified)
---------------------
Section 609 MVAC Certified
---------------------
"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
  #8  
Old 12-20-2005, 09:52 PM
Southernstar's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Birmingham Alabama
Posts: 196
Originally Posted by boneheaddoctor
pull your head out of the sand...........and open your eyes....

YOU made the assertion it was illegal....so prove it? What law was violated? Can you present any proof whatsoever the president does not have that autority in time of war?

See my earlier post as to why the above is false.
  #9  
Old 12-20-2005, 09:56 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by Southernstar
Look BDB obviously FISA is the law. Ok. Now, you may or may not know of this law. Which basically says that, yes the POTUS can order a suspects phone to be tapped in a time of war. PROVIDING, that within 72 hours of the wire tap, a showing is made to the FISA Court and then the Court will issue a wire tap.
Ok, now I know this is hard to grasp, but W can't just order this on his own and not get the Courts approval. He's not a King.
I think you are posting truthful information but not the whole truth.

The gov can listen to foreign calls without a court order. I mean, we can legally eavesdrop on Chirac's boyfriend's phone if we want, no court order needed.

Also, we can listen, without court order to a foriegn national in the USA talk to a foriegn phone number.

The grey area is when the a US citizen is on the line with a foreigner and one of them is outside of the USA. The Ames case asserted that it was legal without a court order since Ames was presumed to be in contact with a foriegn power, regardless of who was actually on the other phone.

B
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page