I have looked at the American trade deficit with China with last year swelling to $200 billion. I have friends who were laid off because their jobs were outsourced to India, China, or somewhere overseas. This article from today's New York Times open my eyes a bit that the real profits are made by the companies here. Quote "While China gets the wage benefits of globalization, it does not get to keep the profits of globalization."
There are many heated discussions on this issue on this forum, and others, but it is important not to wholly lay the blame on China. Read the article, and tell me what you think. Is this a bias article towards China? Thanks.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/09/business/worldbusiness/09asia.html

Why? We are a nation of blame. We never take time to look at our problems, but quick to blame our problems on others.

While we said jobs are outsorced, just exactly who are doing the outsourcing? Our own corporate Fatcats. But of course.

__________________
95 R129
04 Infiniti G35.5 BS
10 X204

true say.
It's the corporations who want earnings GROWTH quarter after quarter and year after year to please their sharesholders and those alike. Blaming China is just a dumb a ridiculous thing to say. Products made in China is what keeps inflation low in the USA.

__________________
87' 300E champagne - Euro headlights and corners, 8-hole rims, 140,000miles/220,00km.

So everybody should buy shares in these companies that are profiting from Chinese labor. Who are the big players?

__________________
1985 380SE Blue/Blue - 230,000 miles
2012 Subaru Forester 5-speed
2005 Toyota Sienna
2004 Chrysler Sebring convertible
1999 Toyota Tacoma

If you play the market, then it's me and you. So why the blame? You pocket the money, right?

__________________
95 R129
04 Infiniti G35.5 BS
10 X204

So what is the alternative? Oursource and live or keep it local and die. Look at what is happening to the Big Two. Lets face it. Manufacturing is dead. We cannot compete. No sense in beating a dead horse. Our era of great manufacturing is over. When it takes $1500 more to make a car here than it does in a Japanese factory across the road, you know the business is dead and on life support. So lets let it die with dignity and find something else we can do. If we can't manufacture, lets concentrate on say inventing. Gear our students towards that. Cut out all the crap in their school and make the 3 Rs 80% of their academic load.

__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow

Wait a minute here!! I am neutral in this issue. I merely stated that if people are to point fingers to China or India or what have you about our job lost, they should take a hard look at the root cause.

You are shooting the messenger.

__________________
95 R129
04 Infiniti G35.5 BS
10 X204

Response to :

"So what is the alternative? Oursource and live or keep it local and die. Look at what is happening to the Big Two. Lets face it. Manufacturing is dead. We cannot compete. No sense in beating a dead horse. Our era of great manufacturing is over. When it takes $1500 more to make a car here than it does in a Japanese factory across the road, you know the business is dead and on life support."

This is quite a poorly reasoned statement. Manufacturing is dead because
GM and Ford have a problem competing! Yet, the Japanese factory across the street employing American workers, and paying similar wages, can compete. The poster might at least try to think through his apparent contradiction. After all, he is in Madison, Wisconsin. Big university town you know.

If it takes $1500 more than the Japanese plant across the road, why might that be the case? There are many reasons. Here are three that are well known.

Retirement health care costs and employee health care costs. Companies gave away the farm to the unions, and now can't take the benefits away. You've got to scratch your head to understand the logic of unions that price the company to it's demise.

Reason number two factories that can't produce different vehicles on the same line with rapid shift from model to model. Translates to inefficient production.

Finally, they have to produce something that consumers want to buy.
Think, Chrysler 300, for instance.

I'm not saying that we don't have a problem with plant closures. We do, and it directly affects my clients. I just had to react to this silly post.

Steve

Try quoting. It makes the response easier to read. Thanx.

I could care less why at this point. Bottom line is that we cannot compete and it is doubtful that things can change. I think it is time we moved on instead of flogging the dead horse. You have excellent reasons but are things going to go back to the glory days? I doubt it is even possible so why bother?

__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow

And why would you want to "go back" and not forward?

__________________
95 R129
04 Infiniti G35.5 BS
10 X204

I guess I meant that we could reattain our status to the time where US manufacturing was king.

__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow

It is simple really labor costs to much in this country. Thats it.

If you had two pairs of sneakers sitting side by side. Pair A was made in China and costs $80 and pair b was made in Alabama and costs $150. Now consider both are pretty much identical as far as you can tell.

I know the answer 90% of the American public would buy and demand the cheaper shoe.

Supply and demand we demand cheap products (ala Walmart) and the market supplies them.

It also comes down to tax's and regulations. This country is highly taxed and regulated problems you don't have in other countries.

__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200

Gov't Budget Surplus Hits $21B for Jan.
Feb 10 2:20 PM US/Eastern
Email this story

By MARTIN CRUTSINGER
AP Economics Writer


WASHINGTON


The federal government ran a $21 billion budget surplus last month, the best January showing in four years, as both spending and tax receipts set records for the month.

The Treasury Department said the government spent $209 billion last month, a record amount for January and up 7.9 percent from January Government tax receipts, however, also set a record for the month of $230 billion, up 13.7 percent from January 2005.

The faster growth in receipts than in spending pushed the suplus for the month to $21 billion, more than double the $8.6 billion surplus the government recorded in January 2005. It was the biggest January surplus since $43.7 billion in 2002.

For the first four months of the budget year that began on Oct. 1, the deficit totals $98.3 billion, an improvement of 10.2 percent from last year's pace when the deficit totaled $319 billion.

The Bush administration on Monday estimated that the deficit for this year will hit a record in dollar terms of $423 billion, surpassing the old mark of $413 billion set in 2004. The administration blamed increased spending for hurricane relief and the costs of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan for the increase.

However, private economists believe the deficit, while up from last year, will be smaller than the administration's forecasts. Many forecasters are pegging this year's deficit at around $360 billion.

They note that the administration for the past two years has estimated a deficit for the current budget year that is significantly higher than other forecasts, allowing them to claim improvement at the end of the budget year.

President Bush has promised to cut the deficit in half by 2009, the year he will leave office. But that pledge is linked to a projected deficit of $521 billion for 2004 that never materialized.

Hold there!! How do we know the money is still there? I bet you Bush had already spent it in Iraq. He wanted to cut Medicade and Education spending just yesterday, and asked for more money for the war effort. What make you think we have any surplus?

Oops, I forget Uncle Sam also is in printing money business. My bad.

__________________
95 R129
04 Infiniti G35.5 BS
10 X204