Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-08-2007, 02:45 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Southern California, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,538
I am not in favor of those who trade stocks as a vehicle for "investing".

Those that buy stocks for a short term gain are gamblers, not investors.

Investing is a long-term proposition, and holding stocks or bonds for the long haul is essential for optimal returns.

Only buy stocks that you plan on holding for the forseeable future, and avoid the two major pitfalls that lead to poor returns in investors portfolios: rapid turnover and market timing.

Why don't you follow the example of Warren Buffet?

Warren Buffet is my hero and is without a doubt America’s most successful investment manager. The turnover in his portfolio is not only low, it is nearly non-existent. His philosophy is best explained in this 1996 Annual Report of Berkshire Hathaway: “Inactivity strikes us as intelligent behavior. Neither we nor most business managers would dream of feverishly trading highly-profitable subsidiaries because a small move in the Federal Reserve’s discount rate was predicated or because some wall street pundit had reversed his view on the market. Why, then, should we behave differently with our minority positions in wonderful businesses?” “…we keep most of our major holdings regardless of how they are priced relative to (current) intrinsic business value…a ‘til death do us part attitude… As investors, our reaction to money managers who trade stocks daily is much like our attitude toward space exploration. We applaud the endeavor but prefer to skip the ride. …Indeed ‘institutional investor’ is becoming one of those self-contradictions called an oxymoron, like ‘jumbo shrimp’, lady mud-wrestler’, and ‘inexpensive lawyer.’”
__________________
Paul S.

2001 E430, Bourdeaux Red, Oyster interior.
79,200 miles.

1973 280SE 4.5, 170,000 miles. 568 Signal Red, Black MB Tex. "The Red Baron".
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-08-2007, 03:54 PM
Skid Row Joe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,482
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by suginami View Post
I am not in favor of those who trade stocks as a vehicle for "investing".

Those that buy stocks for a short term gain are gamblers, not investors.

Investing is a long-term proposition, and holding stocks or bonds for the long haul is essential for optimal returns.

Only buy stocks that you plan on holding for the forseeable future, and avoid the two major pitfalls that lead to poor returns in investors portfolios: rapid turnover and market timing.

Why don't you follow the example of Warren Buffet?

Warren Buffet is my hero and is without a doubt America’s most successful investment manager. The turnover in his portfolio is not only low, it is nearly non-existent. His philosophy is best explained in this 1996 Annual Report of Berkshire Hathaway: “Inactivity strikes us as intelligent behavior. Neither we nor most business managers would dream of feverishly trading highly-profitable subsidiaries because a small move in the Federal Reserve’s discount rate was predicated or because some wall street pundit had reversed his view on the market. Why, then, should we behave differently with our minority positions in wonderful businesses?” “…we keep most of our major holdings regardless of how they are priced relative to (current) intrinsic business value…a ‘til death do us part attitude… As investors, our reaction to money managers who trade stocks daily is much like our attitude toward space exploration. We applaud the endeavor but prefer to skip the ride. …Indeed ‘institutional investor’ is becoming one of those self-contradictions called an oxymoron, like ‘jumbo shrimp’, lady mud-wrestler’, and ‘inexpensive lawyer.’”
People have zilch attention spans, is what I surmise, suginami. The masses are clueless on acheiving personal financial wealth.......

When I started buying shares of Berkshire-Hathaway stock, in the $1,000 a-share-range over two decades ago, I noticed how people involved in financial sales products, would instantly become very uncomfortable in comparing their products to my Berkshire holdings. Financial sales people (and their sheep) have nothing that can compare to Berkshire's 22%+ a year, compounded performance since 1965.

Berkshire-Hathaway is currently trading in the $135,000 a share range........
__________________
'06 E320 CDI
'17 Corvette Stingray Vert

Last edited by Skid Row Joe; 11-08-2007 at 04:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-08-2007, 07:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NW OKlahoma
Posts: 410
Don't do it, man! The only way I would advocate such an account is if I could take the specified amount of cash (in your case, $500) out of the client's pocket and burn it on my desk while he watched-and he didn't twitch. Stock accounts traded short-term are, as many have mentioned here, gambling. Get with an adviser you trust and set about building a long term, diversified, appropriate-for-you portfolio.
__________________
1983 M-B 240D-Gone too.
1976 M-B 300D-Departed.

"Good" is the worst enemy of "Great".
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page