Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-14-2008, 08:42 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
Hocus-pocus laws

US holds fire on EU GM food ban
Activists in Europe continue to protest against GM produce
BBC

The United States says it will suspend temporarily its right to impose sanctions on EU goods in a trade dispute over biotech crops. The EU missed a World Trade Organisation (WTO) deadline on Friday to end restrictions on imports of some genetically modified (GM) products.

US trade spokeswoman Gretchen Hamel said the EU would be given the chance to show "meaningful progress".

She said the US remained very concerned with EU treatment of biotech products.

"We are taking steps necessary under WTO rules to preserve our right in the WTO to suspend trade concessions," she said, adding that the Bush administration would assess EU policy periodically.

Austrian problem

The case was also brought by Argentina and Canada with all three countries arguing their farmers lost money because of GM bans.

Ms Hamel said that genetically engineered crops now accounted for a substantial share of US farm production and exports.

The EU has difficulty complying with the ruling, chiefly because of a ban on GM products by Austria.

But the US trade spokeswoman singled out France for most criticism, following its decision to extend a ban on the only GM crop currently grown there.

In December, Paris imposed a temporary ban on the commercial sale of a genetically modified crop (MON 810) developed by the US biotech company, Monsanto.

"It is hard to overstate our disappointment," Ms Hamel said.

In 1998, the EU introduced a moratorium on new biotech authorisations that lasted six years. The three countries behind the complaint to the WTO argued that the ban was about protectionism rather than science.

Biotech crops, including corn and soybeans that have been genetically modified to resist insects or disease, have been widely grown in the US for years.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-14-2008, 09:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 275
One of many trades the US made in exchange for the Brits not challenging the UIGEA, I expect.
__________________
1984 300TD
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-14-2008, 10:41 PM
300EVIL's Avatar
Moderator Incarnate
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Lake Geneva, WI.
Posts: 1,676
Good! GM crops are the devil!
__________________
Current Stable:
01 ML55 AMG
92 500E (a few mods)
87 300E (lots of mods)
00 Chevy 3500HD Diesel Box Truck
68 18' Donzi Marine
06 GT i-Drive7 1.0 Mountain Bike (with GPS!)

PREVIOUSLY OWNED:83 300SD, 87 420SEL, 88 420SEL, 90 420SEL, 86 560SEL, 86 190E 2.3-16V AMG, 94 E320

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-17-2008, 01:54 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,851
So if I get this right, the U.S. wants to export genetically modified ag commodities to the EU, but certain EU countries ban GM food products. The U.S. is understandably disappointed at this reduction in the opportunity to sell our products abroad, but we aren't invoking sanctions yet. Right?

Personally, I'm ambivalent about GM food products. They seem ok so far from a health perspective, but I tend not to trust anything that hasn't been in fairly widespread use for at least 20 years.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 400,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 22,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-17-2008, 10:13 AM
aklim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Location: Greenfield WI, USA
Posts: 8,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skippy View Post
They seem ok so far from a health perspective, but I tend not to trust anything that hasn't been in fairly widespread use for at least 20 years.
Kinda of a catch 22, isn't it? Can't be widespread without going out there and can't go out there without being widespread.
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-17-2008, 11:48 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,851
Quote:
Originally Posted by aklim View Post
Kinda of a catch 22, isn't it? Can't be widespread without going out there and can't go out there without being widespread.
Not at all. Something can very easily be widespread without ME using it. I was the last kid in high school to go to CD's instead of tapes. My vehicles all had carburetors until the early 21st century. I didn't have a cell phone until 2004. ABS, traction control, stability control, tire pressure monitoring, airbags? Still don't have them or want them.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 400,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 22,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.

Last edited by Skippy; 01-17-2008 at 11:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-17-2008, 01:22 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
Crop scientists are NOT creating genes de novo. They are capturing genes and sticking into frankenplants and such. This is almost exactly what has been going on in ag and animal husbandry for 10,000 years -- selective breeding. What is different is two things.

1. Dramatic shorten of time from crossing effort to farm.

2. Ability to introduce genes across phyla.

But there are no new genes ...... Yet.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-17-2008, 01:26 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,851
It's #2 that has some people worried.

__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 400,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 22,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page