Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-09-2008, 04:45 PM
MTI's Avatar
MTI MTI is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 10,626
Wisconsin Lemons

Court Clarifies Wis. Lemon Law

Forbes, 4-9-2008
MADISON, Wis. - Customers who buy faulty cars cannot win damages under Wisconsin's Lemon Law if they fail to cooperate with manufacturers, an appeals court ruled Wednesday. The law requires manufacturers to give refunds or replacement vehicles to customers who buy lemons within 30 days of receiving the request. Customers can sue for harsh penalties - including double damages - if manufacturers do not comply.

Courts have generally ruled against manufacturers who sought to delay a refund or replacement within that window as long as customers provided the necessary information.

But the District 2 Court of Appeals, for the first time, defined a customer's "good faith obligations" under the law in its ruling on Wednesday. Customers must work with manufacturers toward a solution within the 30-day timeframe or they cannot later sue for damages under the law, the court said.

The court ruled in the case of Marco Marquez, a customer who bought a Mercedes in Milwaukee that turned out to be a dud. He sought a refund in 2005 and then sued Mercedes Benz for damages after he did not receive one within 30 days.

The company claimed Marquez ignored its requests to turn over information about his auto loan. Mercedes argued it needed to know how much he owed on the loan to give him a proper refund.

Marquez claimed he did not remember those requests and Mercedes Benz did not need the loan information. A Waukesha County judge ruled in his favor in a summary judgment, ordering Mercedes to pay him $202,000.

The appeals court overturned that decision and ordered a trial to determine whether Marquez acted in good faith. Consumers who intentionally prevent manufacturers from complying with the 30-day requirement are not entitled to damages, it said.


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-09-2008, 06:27 PM
WVOtoGO's Avatar
Up & Over
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Usually, in the skies above you.
Posts: 151
Ooops...my bad.

From the title, I thought you were going to take a shot at Aklim.

__________________
1980 300D - Veggie Burner !
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page