Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-13-2009, 05:19 PM
KarTek's Avatar
<- Ryuko of Kill La Kill
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bahama/Eno Twp, NC
Posts: 3,258
Question about commercial airliner pressurization.

Folks,

My GF has a condition called "LAM" which is an abbreviation for a long-arsed word that describes the affected areas of the body. You can Google it for more info but suffice to say, as it progresses, it makes it harder to breathe because it reduces the ability of the lungs to transfer oxygen to the blood. For her, even a small amount of exertion can be exhausting.

Anyway, she took a commercial flight to NJ a couple weeks ago - maybe a hour and a half trip. Going up she flew in a newer turboprop, the Bombardier Q400. Supposedly, the Q400 is able to closely fly the profile of a pure jet with the economy of a turboprop. On the way there, she flew a cruising altitude of 19,000 feet. On the way back, she flew in a standard Boeing 737-700 at an altitude of 27,000 feet.

Now to the problem:

On the way up she reported moderate respiratory distress as the aircraft was climbing to cruise altitude. This distress continued until the plane made it's initial descent to EWR. On the way back, she reported no distress of any kind in the 737-700.

The question:

We're trying to account for the difference in flying experiences between the aircraft. As far as pressurization is concerned, what differences, if any, are there between the T-prop and the Jet? How are they pressurized? Bleed air? Are all aircraft pressurized to a standard 8000 feet?

She is a fairly frequent flier and reported feeling well and "normal" before both flights. However, she has never flown in the Q400 before.

Thanks for the ideas and insight.

__________________
-Evan


Benz Fleet:
1968 UNIMOG 404.114
1998 E300
2008 E63


Non-Benz Fleet:
1992 Aerostar
1993 MR2
2000 F250
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-13-2009, 05:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,269
If I remember correctly, I think Boeing lowered the cabin pressure to roughly 4,000 in their newer planes.

Not sure though, I'm probably wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-13-2009, 08:44 PM
280EZRider's Avatar
No Dumping
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern Oregon Valley
Posts: 1,599
8000' cabin altitude is the max that any commercial aircraft will ever have. The pressure differential achievable depends on the strength of the cabin ribs and skin.

All systems are the same. The cabin is fed bleed air - cooled - and then recirculated. The amount of recirculated air is dependent on the aircraft make & model. At the rear of the aircraft, is a valve that modulates to allow a certain amount of air to escape, thus providing more new bleed air to the cabin. When smoking was still allowed on board, these outflow valves would get so gummed up with nicotine, they had to be thrown out. Now they can be rebuilt if necessary.
__________________

Don't Chrome them; polish them
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-15-2009, 09:51 AM
KarTek's Avatar
<- Ryuko of Kill La Kill
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bahama/Eno Twp, NC
Posts: 3,258
So when you say "max any commercial aircraft will ever have", does that mean maximum cabin pressure (lowest altitude) or maximum altitude (lowest cabin pressure)?

That is to say, 8000' is the minimum pressure and you might find aircraft with higher (<8000') pressure? I'm just trying to understand the increased comfort in one plane versus another.
__________________
-Evan


Benz Fleet:
1968 UNIMOG 404.114
1998 E300
2008 E63


Non-Benz Fleet:
1992 Aerostar
1993 MR2
2000 F250
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-15-2009, 11:01 AM
280EZRider's Avatar
No Dumping
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern Oregon Valley
Posts: 1,599
8000' is the HIGHEST cabin pressure you will encounter.
__________________

Don't Chrome them; polish them
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-15-2009, 11:22 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by 280EZRider View Post
8000' is the HIGHEST cabin pressure you will encounter.
Actually, the statement is confusing.

The highest cabin pressure is at sea level...........prior to takeoff or on landing.

The lowest cabin pressure is maintained at an equivalent of 8000'.........no matter how high the aircraft is actually flying.

At sea level, the pressure in the cabin is 14.7 psi.

The lowest pressure that any passenger will ever see is 10.9 psi.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-15-2009, 11:32 AM
KarTek's Avatar
<- Ryuko of Kill La Kill
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bahama/Eno Twp, NC
Posts: 3,258
Yeah, it's kind of backwards sounding - higher cabin altitude, lower pressure.

So, the bottom line I'm reading is that 8000' is the highest regulated cabin pressure. You will never see anything like 4000' cabin pressure at 27k feet, etc...
__________________
-Evan


Benz Fleet:
1968 UNIMOG 404.114
1998 E300
2008 E63


Non-Benz Fleet:
1992 Aerostar
1993 MR2
2000 F250
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-15-2009, 11:43 AM
280EZRider's Avatar
No Dumping
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern Oregon Valley
Posts: 1,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
Actually, the statement is confusing.

The highest cabin pressure is at sea level...........prior to takeoff or on landing.

The lowest cabin pressure is maintained at an equivalent of 8000'.........no matter how high the aircraft is actually flying.

At sea level, the pressure in the cabin is 14.7 psi.

The lowest pressure that any passenger will ever see is 10.9 psi.
Good point: I meant to say the highest CABIN ALTITUDE you will experience is 8000. We always tried to run slightly lower than 10.9 pressure differential, to be on the safe side. As I mentioned before, the pressure differential allowable is dependent on the strength of the body of the aircraft. Actually, at sea level on the ground, you will have no cabin presure differential, but you will have the ambient atmospheric pressure because a switch on one of the landing gears is activated when the gear is supporting weight, thus opening both the rear and emergency outflow valves.

When starting a decent from altitude, the cabin altitude must be manually started down as well. As the aircraft approaches ground level, the pressure differential becomes less. If you ever feel a slight bump in the ears on landing, this means the cabin pressure was not lowered soon enough. The idea is to have the cabin altitude arrive at ground level (not necessarily sea level) the same time as the aircraft touches down.
__________________

Don't Chrome them; polish them
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-15-2009, 11:55 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by KarTek View Post

So, the bottom line I'm reading is that 8000' is the highest regulated cabin pressure. You will never see anything like 4000' cabin pressure at 27k feet, etc...

8000' is the highest regulated cabin altitude.

We don't have a conclusion as to whether certain aircraft types would maintain a lower cabin altitude at 27K or higher. One suggestion was that a new 737-700 might maintain 4000'..........but, I doubt it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-15-2009, 01:19 PM
lutzTD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lutz, Florida (N of Tampa)
Posts: 2,461
Ive found that the same plane has dramatically different pressure profiles. sometimes its very comfortable, other times they seem to just open the valve like an on off switch. I get really bad ear aches if they dont do it right so I notice. I carry on a plastic water bottle and drink it during the flight and then tighten the cap at cruise altitude. I can watch it collapse as we descend, sometimes it is gradual from the beginning of descent and sometimes it is very fast. I think one of the crew must control this, I wish it was more consistent or computer controlled. I have experience the instant depressure someone above described during landing. ouch.... so maybe your experience is related to crew and not the plane.
__________________

1982 300CD Turbo (Otis, "ups & downs") parts for sale
2003 TJ with Hemi (to go anywhere, quickly) sold
2001 Excursion Powerstroke (to go dependably)
1970 Mustang 428SCJ (to go fast)
1962 Corvette LS1 (to go in style)
2001 Schwinn Grape Krate 10spd (if all else fails)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-15-2009, 02:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by colincoon View Post
If I remember correctly, I think Boeing lowered the cabin pressure to roughly 4,000 in their newer planes.

Not sure though, I'm probably wrong.
The 787 will be able to do 6000'. That is as good as it gets AFAIK. And they will be able to run higher humidity (15% vs 4%) which is a big factor also.

"With the 787 fuselage made of composite material, it's possible to increase the humidity without corroding the airplane over time. On the 787, the manmade composite material is formed and baked into large barrels that are linked together to form the fuselage. The composite material doesn't corrode as aluminum does. As a result, the 787 cabin air system will allow 15% humidity, a more comfortable level than the current 4%.

Humidity's adjustable

The 787 crew will be able to program the cabin air system for optimal humidity based on the number of passengers aboard, Sinnett says.

The cabin air will be compressed to resemble an altitude of 6,000 feet above sea level, instead of 8,000 feet, increasing the air pressure and oxygen inside the cabin.

As a result of its lower simulated cabin altitude, the 787's air will have 8% more oxygen for absorption into the blood. In studies, only 15% of passengers breathing 787-type air reported throat irritation, vs. 30% of passengers breathing traditional cabin air.

Put simply, "The lower you go, the better people feel," Sinnett says.

"The impact is more pronounced the longer the flight."

Boeing-sponsored studies have found volatile organic gases build up inside the tight confines of a plane, making some passengers feel ill. Sources include hand wipes, cologne and vinyl luggage.

As a result, Boeing has designed the 787 with not only the HEPA filters now in widespread use, but also a second filtering system that removes as many of the bad gases as possible.
__________________
1998 C230 330,000 miles (currently dead of second failed EIS, yours will fail too, turning you into the dealer's personal human cash machine)
1988 F150 144,000 miles (leaks all the colors of the rainbow)
Previous stars: 1981 Brava 210,000 miles, 1978 128 150,000 miles, 1977 B200 Van 175,000 miles, 1972 Vega (great, if rusty, car), 1972 Celica, 1986.5 Supra
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-15-2009, 02:09 PM
Rafi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Garden State
Posts: 474
Quote:
Originally Posted by mpolli View Post
And they will be able to run higher humidity which is a big factor also.
Is higher humidity a good thing on an airliner ? More germs and virusus grow/stay alive in humid condition.
__________________
2010 ML350 Bluetec
2012 Mustang Convertible
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-15-2009, 02:32 PM
280EZRider's Avatar
No Dumping
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern Oregon Valley
Posts: 1,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by mpolli View Post
The 787 will be able to do 6000'. That is as good as it gets AFAIK. And they will be able to run higher humidity (15% vs 4%) which is a big factor also.

"With the 787 fuselage made of composite material, it's possible to increase the humidity without corroding the airplane over time. On the 787, the manmade composite material is formed and baked into large barrels that are linked together to form the fuselage. The composite material doesn't corrode as aluminum does. As a result, the 787 cabin air system will allow 15% humidity, a more comfortable level than the current 4%.

Humidity's adjustable

The 787 crew will be able to program the cabin air system for optimal humidity based on the number of passengers aboard, Sinnett says.

The cabin air will be compressed to resemble an altitude of 6,000 feet above sea level, instead of 8,000 feet, increasing the air pressure and oxygen inside the cabin.

As a result of its lower simulated cabin altitude, the 787's air will have 8% more oxygen for absorption into the blood. In studies, only 15% of passengers breathing 787-type air reported throat irritation, vs. 30% of passengers breathing traditional cabin air.

Put simply, "The lower you go, the better people feel," Sinnett says.

"The impact is more pronounced the longer the flight."

Boeing-sponsored studies have found volatile organic gases build up inside the tight confines of a plane, making some passengers feel ill. Sources include hand wipes, cologne and vinyl luggage.

As a result, Boeing has designed the 787 with not only the HEPA filters now in widespread use, but also a second filtering system that removes as many of the bad gases as possible.
I think this is a good beginning, but the issue of percentage of recirculated air to fresh (bleed air) needs to be more agressively addressed. The excuse of fuel economy to use less bleed air has always seemed a bit flimsy to me.
__________________

Don't Chrome them; polish them
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-15-2009, 05:42 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 578
Quote:
Originally Posted by lutzTD View Post
I carry on a plastic water bottle and drink it during the flight and then tighten the cap at cruise altitude. I can watch it collapse as we descend, sometimes it is gradual from the beginning of descent and sometimes it is very fast.
I like that idea. I'm going to try to remember to do that next time I fly. Might also be interesting to cap an empty bottle while on the ground and compare how it expands and contracts relative to the one that is capped at altitude.

__________________
1987 W201 190D
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page