Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #226  
Old 08-01-2009, 08:48 PM
Chris Bell's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by DieselAddict View Post
No doubt, but that wasn't the issue.
No, that wasa exactly the point. You claim that Hussien care will lower medical costs. The CBO says there is nothing in that bill that will lower costs. Frankly,I think I'll put my faith in the CBO evaluation over a far left wing crank on the internet.

__________________
I'm sick of .sig files
Reply With Quote
  #227  
Old 08-01-2009, 09:57 PM
MS Fowler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Littlestown PA ( 6 miles south of Gettysburg)
Posts: 2,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Bell View Post
No, that wasa exactly the point. You claim that Hussien care will lower medical costs. The CBO says there is nothing in that bill that will lower costs. Frankly,I think I'll put my faith in the CBO evaluation over a far left wing crank on the internet.
They are using a debating technique--
First "Its to lower costs"
Then " Its to cover ALL Americans"
Whichever one you debate, they switch to the other "reason"
__________________
1982 300SD " Wotan" ..On the road as of Jan 8, 2007 with Historic Tags
Reply With Quote
  #228  
Old 08-01-2009, 10:24 PM
cmac2012's Avatar
Renaissances Dude
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 35,959
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Bell View Post
Are you happy with the congressional budget office reporting that Hussien care will provide zero savings, since it's stated goal is to save money, that pretty much makes it a complete failure before it even begins.

From CBO director Elmendorf,

“In CBO’s judgment, the probability is high that no savings will be realized.”

From the same article, love this quote from Durbin (D-Ill)

Sen. Richard Durbin (D., Ill.), the assistant majority leader, admitted that Senate Democrats were frustrated with the CBO's various pronouncements over their efforts to push through health-care overhaul.

In other words...senate Democrats are frustrated with the CBO for continually speaking the truth.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203517304574303014243807246.html
I think it would be difficult to accurately forecast such things at any rate. If the horror stories I've read of regarding pre-existing conditions or canceling of policy based on some trivial peripheral issue can be avoided, looks like that would be an increase in efficiency of a profound sort. That is, someone gets crucial care in a timely fashion such that they continue to remain alive long enough to continue contributing to the nation's wealth and tax base.

The nonsense about rationing care is unbelievable. Just as it would be impossible for every citizen to own a 20,000 sq. ft. house, a Bentley, a Ferrari, and several MBs, it will be impossible for every citizen to get $1 million per year in medical care for the last several years of their life.

I suppose we can just insist that all who want a heart, liver, kidney, or lung transplant should be given one right away -- to hell with rationing!!

But scarcity, or at least limits on, resources is pretty obvious in this case: there aren't enough organs available to satisfy demand.

Likewise, it is impossible for each person to have a small army at their disposal whenever they wish. We have people now getting all sorts of marginally useful extreme measures, surgery, etc. while children or people in their prime go w/o basic care. Not efficient. Welcome to second rate international economic status.
__________________
Te futueo et caballum tuum

1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K
Reply With Quote
  #229  
Old 08-01-2009, 10:26 PM
cmac2012's Avatar
Renaissances Dude
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 35,959
Quote:
Originally Posted by DieselAddict View Post
You don't know what you're talking about. The savings in question are from a recent change in the bill, not the reform as a whole. At least read what you're quoting before you quote it.

I'm also not entirely happy with some of the versions of the bill, but for entirely different reasons. I'm not happy with those versions that seek to water down the public insurance plan so it doesn't affect private insurance companies negatively. Also I don't see anything about limiting medical liability, but maybe it's in there somewhere. I especially dislike the idea of mandating insurance for everyone and subsidizing poor people to buy private insurance rather than offering everyone a decent public health plan, i.e. big money for private insurance at taxpayers' expense.
Utter insanity. I'm sure insurance execs salivate at this idea, a mandate that they become further enriched at the taxpayer's expense. The powerful lobbies own and control our nation. It will be difficult to overcome.
__________________
Te futueo et caballum tuum

1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K
Reply With Quote
  #230  
Old 08-02-2009, 12:55 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Bell View Post
No, that wasa exactly the point. You claim that Hussien care will lower medical costs. The CBO says there is nothing in that bill that will lower costs. Frankly,I think I'll put my faith in the CBO evaluation over a far left wing crank on the internet.
Again, you don't know what you're talking about. I said no such thing. The article you quoted mentioned the CBO saying a recent change in the bill would not make the bill cheaper by much. The CBO wasn't talking about whether the health care bill as a whole would lower costs in the long run, at least not in that article from what I saw. That's a separate and debatable issue. But the fact is we spend much more per person on health care than any other country, and our health outcomes are far from the greatest. And each of those other countries has some sort of universal health care plan.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #231  
Old 08-02-2009, 01:01 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmac2012 View Post
Utter insanity. I'm sure insurance execs salivate at this idea, a mandate that they become further enriched at the taxpayer's expense. The powerful lobbies own and control our nation. It will be difficult to overcome.
Sadly that's true. I think paying the poor to purchase private insurance and requiring everyone to purchase it was one way to get the insurance companies to agree to stop rejecting people based on pre-exisiting conditions. Without a decent public health insurance plan to provide some real competition and bargaining power I have little doubt that the private insurance companies will be among the biggest beneficiaries of any health care reform.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #232  
Old 08-02-2009, 11:46 AM
732002's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 747
Two debates going on here.

1. Should everyone be covered?

2. If the answer is yes to the 1st question, what
is the best way to do this.
Reply With Quote
  #233  
Old 08-03-2009, 01:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by 732002 View Post
Two debates going on here.

1. Should everyone be covered?

2. If the answer is yes to the 1st question, what
is the best way to do this.
I would say:

1. Yes, everyone should be covered and everyone should contribute to the system rather than waiting until they get sick before seeking insurance.

2. Have a public insurance plan that every legal resident can use, offers good benefits and is taxpayer paid. Limit medical liability. Provide incentives for doctors to go into general medicine where demand will increase. Provide incentives for preventive care and patient well-being.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #234  
Old 08-03-2009, 02:41 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by DieselAddict View Post
I would say:

1. Yes, everyone should be covered and everyone should contribute to the system rather than waiting until they get sick before seeking insurance.

2. Have a public insurance plan that every legal resident can use, offers good benefits and is taxpayer paid. Limit medical liability. Provide incentives for doctors to go into general medicine where demand will increase. Provide incentives for preventive care and patient well-being.
How is one to enforce who is a legal resident? Can't be done, just ask California.
Reply With Quote
  #235  
Old 08-03-2009, 05:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTUpower View Post
How is one to enforce who is a legal resident? Can't be done, just ask California.
Sure it can be done. Whether it will be done is another issue. I'm thinking with the national/public insurance system everyone who's legal here would get an insurance card from the govt. If the system works properly, then illegals wouldn't get the card, and wouldn't get any treatment, aside from maybe minimal ER treatment if necessary on the way to the deportation center.

__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page