I don't think everyone being entitled to a right is a commandment- More like a blanket "Thou shalt not infringe on the rights of others" or "Thou shalt keep thy nose in thine own business".

Strike intentionally and irresponsibly.
I agree with 4x4. The last three are what I consdider declarations of entitlements, not commandments.

I always liked the comment by the Supreme Court Justice who said, " My rights end where yours begin."

__________________
Strelnik
Invest in America: Buy a Congressman!

1950 170SD
1951 Citroen 11BN
1953 Citroen 11BNF limo
1953 220a project
1959 180D
1960 190D
1960 Borgward Isabella TS 2dr
1983 240D daily driver
1983 380SL
1990 350SDL daily driver alt
3 x Citroen DS21M, down from 5
3 x Citroen 2CV, down from 6

I suspect the reason they did not propose a blanket statement like that is because it leaves completely open what those rights might or might not be. So they wanted to specify particular important rights.

Not sure why people are interpreting those rights as positive rights as opposed to negative rights. A right of free speech does not necessarily require that someone provide speech to another person.

__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13