Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 07-29-2011, 09:24 PM
sjh sjh is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt L View Post
The bolded step above is invalid.

And in the Mathematics world, the "1 disproof" is called a "counterexample." And it is sufficient to disprove the theorem.

Proving the theorem is equivalent to showing that there are NO counterexamples. It should be clear that this is usually more work.
40+ years of math, a fair amount fairly advanced, the term "counterexample" doesn't "strike a bell".

Google tells me that counterexample is 3x more prevalent than disproof so you seem to be "right on the money".

The majority of my math has been application driven but the joy of just pursuing the rigor or intellectual discipline that abstract math contains still exists.

Glad to see you could contribute.

PS - I cannot see the bolded lines that you reference.

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-29-2011, 10:12 PM
Yak Yak is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,711
Matt is correct that let k = n is an incorrect substitution because the equation can't be shown to balance. n is already used on the left and I arbitrarily inserted it on the right.

And yes, a single counterexample does disprove a general theorem. However, relying on always being able to quickly find a specific integer that disproves a general theorem is a risky way of doing proofs.

It's not the approach I'd recommend counting on - or studying for - going into a final. What method did he use to find 3? Trial and error is great when it works, but is a horrible feeling in an exam when it doesn't.

What if the next question is "is there any solution set where the equation is true"? Would the answer be "not 3" or would there be more work involved?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-29-2011, 10:28 PM
Yak Yak is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,711
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt L View Post

<>

In the specific case, the question is "prove or disprove." The first step, of course, is to decide if the theorem can possibly be correct. Of course it cannot, because n=3 disproves it. IN GENERAL.

There is absolutely no need to go through such machinations that you are attempting.
This approach shows a problem with relying a specific counterexample being quickly identifiable (or unidentifiable). Using the approach of "the first step is to decide if the theorem can possibly be correct. Of course it cannot, because..."

What if you start with n=2? Can it possibly be correct? Yes. 8? Yes. 32? Yes. 488? Yes. 3? No.

What if there are no "disprove" questions on the final?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-29-2011, 11:54 PM
sjh sjh is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt L View Post
The bolded lines are in the quoted section of my reply (currently post #11).
Thanks for telling me where it is.

Regarding the OP question of how to prepare for the exam. I'll suggest that developing the intellect is similar to developing muscle and that well structured mental exercise will literally both grow new brain cells and new inter-connections between cells.

So his (or her) best strategy is to develop healthy habits and to exercise their mind regularly.

Please post all the math remarks that you can. It's enjoyable to encounter the diversity of topics in OD.

Take care.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-29-2011, 11:57 PM
TheDon's Avatar
Ghost of Diesels Past
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,285
Thanks for your help. All I can say is this class has been the most confusing and difficult to date
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-30-2011, 12:09 AM
sjh sjh is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDon View Post
Thanks for your help. All I can say is this class has been the most confusing and difficult to date
Go study Physical Chemistry for a year; spend 4 months with the Schrodinger equation. I still hurt 35 years later.

Best to you with the exam.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page