The Trash Newt Thread

[JollyRoger]

Originally Posted by LarryBible

Now that Newt is climbing in the polls he is obviously the next one with the target on his back. Politico and others will be scheming and caniving soon.

This thread is provided so that all you lefties out there can get a head start on Politico.

I provided the thread, now you can provide the trash.

You do realize that Politico is run by a former assitant to President Reagan, do you not? :

Fred Ryan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And he is not some editor there, he is the CEO, the guy who only needs to pick up the phone if there is some kind of biased reporting going on, you know that, right? How exactly is a guy who spends his time on the side being the chairman of the Reagan Presidential Library, how can he somehow be a "lefty" at the same time? Are you saying he is a spy of some sort? That the GOP lets a spy run the Reagan Library, a shadow Democrat of some sorts? I don't think so. What I think, is that when you identify "Politico" with "lefties", you are simply making it all up. Politico is a news outlet run by a top member of the Republican Establishment wing, so it is pretty easy to make the case that Politico is probably in the bag for Romney, given who actually runs the place, a Reagan guy, then it is to claim it is some "lefty" information outlet. The real truth is you are so brainwashed, it is impossible for you to see the truth, and that anyone who attacks your guy must be a "lefty". So the real truth is, you are so far to the right, even the Reaganites have become "lefties" to you.

Why are you making things up about "lefties" when it is obvious that you folks on the right are eating each other alive in your quest for power?

[Solid Snake]

Originally Posted by JollyRoger

You do realize that Politico is run by a former assitant to President Reagan, do you not? :

Fred Ryan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And he is not some editor there, he is the CEO, the guy who only needs to pick up the phone if there is some kind of biased reporting going on, you know that, right? How exactly is a guy who spends his time on the side being the chairman of the Reagan Presidential Library, how can he somehow be a "lefty" at the same time? Are you saying he is a spy of some sort? That the GOP lets a spy run the Reagan Library, a shadow Democrat of some sorts? I don't think so. What I think, is that when you identify "Politico" with "lefties", you are simply making it all up. Politico is a news outlet run by a top member of the Republican Establishment wing, so it is pretty easy to make the case that Politico is probably in the bag for Romney, given who actually runs the place, a Reagan guy, then it is to claim it is some "lefty" information outlet. The real truth is you are so brainwashed, it is impossible for you to see the truth, and that anyone who attacks your guy must be a "lefty". So the real truth is, you are so far to the right, even the Reaganites have become "lefties" to you.

Why are you making things up about "lefties" when it is obvious that you folks on the right are eating each other alive in your quest for power?

Red= Well there you go.
Blue= Never implied.

I don't see Politico leaning any which way but loose, ever since their endorsement of President Bush years ago. I enjoy reading you tell Larry he's brainwashed and basically implying ignorance to the 'truth', when you yourself take the stance of every lefty I have the so 'gracious opportunity' to converse with in Connecticut.

Don't worry Larry, we're just too simple and ignorant to see that the left wing knows whats best for us common folk. Maybe I should emulate our current President and play a round of golf in between classes and conferences. Or lend money to companies that go belly up all over the place. Or force emissions regulations that no one wants to adhere to except So Cal. Buy out an awful auto union to produce more cars no one 'wants'.

As to our ravenous appetite for power, I don't recall President Bush entering a conflict without Congressional approval or throwing fliff around like a sultan. I also only recall the slaying of one dictator under Bush's regime, and two down thus far in the Obama Presidency.
So... who's the war monger?

I don't get why anyone follows the leader boards regarding who's on top in the public vote for the Republicans. While Romney isn't the furthest right candidate we've got, he's well moderate enough to succeed appealing to ALL constituents. Plus, it's the RNCs final decision anyways. Cain is obviously a no go-- he has less foreign policy education than Obama. Gingrich is an easy kill skeleton wise, but I would thoroughly enjoy watching him mop the floor with Obama in a debate. I can hear him stutter like Dubya now.

[JollyRoger]

Originally Posted by Solid Snake

Red= Well there you go.
Blue= Never implied.

I don't see Politico leaning any which way but loose, ever since their endorsement of President Bush years ago. I enjoy reading you tell Larry he's brainwashed and basically implying ignorance to the 'truth', when you yourself take the stance of every lefty I have the so 'gracious opportunity' to converse with in Connecticut.

Don't worry Larry, we're just too simple and ignorant to see that the left wing knows whats best for us common folk. Maybe I should emulate our current President and play a round of golf in between classes and conferences. Or lend money to companies that go belly up all over the place. Or force emissions regulations that no one wants to adhere to except So Cal. Buy out an awful auto union to produce more cars no one 'wants'.

As to our ravenous appetite for power, I don't recall President Bush entering a conflict without Congressional approval or throwing fliff around like a sultan. I also only recall the slaying of one dictator under Bush's regime, and two down thus far in the Obama Presidency.
So... who's the war monger?

I don't get why anyone follows the leader boards regarding who's on top in the public vote for the Republicans. While Romney isn't the furthest right candidate we've got, he's well moderate enough to succeed appealing to ALL constituents. Plus, it's the RNCs final decision anyways. Cain is obviously a no go-- he has less foreign policy education than Obama. Gingrich is an easy kill skeleton wise, but I would thoroughly enjoy watching him mop the floor with Obama in a debate. I can hear him stutter like Dubya now.

Jesus, talk about regurgitated propaganda.

[elchivito]

Originally Posted by Solid Snake

Red= Well there you go.
Blue= Never implied.

I don't see Politico leaning any which way but loose, ever since their endorsement of President Bush years ago. I enjoy reading you tell Larry he's brainwashed and basically implying ignorance to the 'truth', when you yourself take the stance of every lefty I have the so 'gracious opportunity' to converse with in Connecticut.

Don't worry Larry, we're just too simple and ignorant to see that the left wing knows whats best for us common folk. Maybe I should emulate our current President and play a round of golf in between classes and conferences. Or lend money to companies that go belly up all over the place. Or force emissions regulations that no one wants to adhere to except So Cal. Buy out an awful auto union to produce more cars no one 'wants'.

As to our ravenous appetite for power, I don't recall President Bush entering a conflict without Congressional approval or throwing fliff around like a sultan. I also only recall the slaying of one dictator under Bush's regime, and two down thus far in the Obama Presidency.
So... who's the war monger?

I don't get why anyone follows the leader boards regarding who's on top in the public vote for the Republicans. While Romney isn't the furthest right candidate we've got, he's well moderate enough to succeed appealing to ALL constituents. Plus, it's the RNCs final decision anyways. Cain is obviously a no go-- he has less foreign policy education than Obama. Gingrich is an easy kill skeleton wise, but I would thoroughly enjoy watching him mop the floor with Obama in a debate. I can hear him stutter like Dubya now.

Ah, who can argue with the voice of years of experience, watching political campaigns, personally living through various administrations, choosing and voting for presidents. How many was it again?

[Solid Snake]

Originally Posted by elchivito

Ah, who can argue with the voice of years of experience, watching political campaigns, personally living through various administrations, choosing and voting for presidents. How many was it again?

Four, if you count lame duck periods

I speak not from experience or political background. I stick by whichever policies can make America's GDP positive over debt. It just so happens that this makes me bow right.

[Air&Road]

Originally Posted by Solid Snake

Four, if you count lame duck periods

I speak not from experience or political background. I stick by whichever policies can make America's GDP positive over debt. It just so happens that this makes me bow right.

Don't waste your breath snake. Common sense and the power of observation is something that many are incapable of understanding.

I've lived during 12 Presidential Administrations and voted in ten Presidential races, but experience means nothing in the minds of rank beginners. In your case, you're just a quick study.

[elchivito]

Originally Posted by LarryBible

Don't waste your breath snake. Common sense and the power of observation is something that many are incapable of understanding.

Translation:
Only those who BOW - an excellent word choice by the way- the same direction we do have any common sense or understanding.

Originally Posted by LarryBible

I've lived during 12 Presidential Administrations and voted in ten Presidential races, but experience means nothing in the minds of rank beginners. In your case, you're just a quick study.

Translation: Even though you've yet to actually cast a vote in a presidential race, the fact that you and I agree makes you real smart.

[Air&Road]

Originally Posted by elchivito

Translation:
Only those who BOW - an excellent word choice by the way- the same direction we do have any common sense or understanding.



Translation: Even though you've yet to actually cast a vote in a presidential race, the fact that you and I agree makes you real smart.

Very Good! You should follow suit!

[tbomachines]

Originally Posted by LarryBible

Common sense and the power of observation is something that many are incapable of understanding

Oh, the extreme irony! Almost as good as when you started talking about looking at facts!

[Air&Road]

Originally Posted by tbomachines

Oh, the extreme irony! Almost as good as when you started talking about looking at facts!

You mean facts like all of the things considered to be bad by the left, that would NOT have taken place had Slick Willy had enough character to not commit adultery and purjory?

When writing the above paragraph something popped in my head. I remember very well in a debate between George HW Bush and Clinton. George pointed to Bill Clinton and pointed out that "this man has no character." Well Slick proved GHW correct!