Quote:
Originally Posted by Honus
You are incorrect. My conclusion is based on tons of facts.
|
Care to cite any? Was any investigation performed by the government on this specific topic whereby Russert could have had some data in his pocket? If true, then I agree with you. But, I sense that the "tons of facts" were available after the interview..........not before.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Honus
I think all we can do is agree to disagree about it, because there is not enough time in the day to go back over all that stuff. Not allowed to challenge a vice president? This is America. We are almost duty bound to challenge our leaders.That's all I ask.
|
I believe your expectations of Tim Russert are a bit over the top in an interview with the vice-president. If you're going to challenge the vice-president, you had better be absolutely sure of your position. It's very hard to be sure of one's position as a private citizen. It's a certainty that the government knows considerably more. This is the basis for not challenging a sitting vice-president. It can be done, but not in a cavalier manner and certainly not in an interview where the facts are not in the purvey of the interviewer.