Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-13-2012, 01:29 PM
retmil46's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 344
$7 Billion for a Destroyer?

Now I'm retired Navy, and like to see that (within reason) the guys are getting enough new ships and equipment as needed to be able to do their jobs - but even for me, this is just way over the top - even the Navy wanted to cancel the bloody thing because it cost so much.

Cutting-edge Navy warship being built in Maine - Yahoo! News

The sub force had a "Cadillac" of their own back in the 90's, the Seawolf class fast attacks, but the bloody things were so expensive that after the Soviet Union folded they only built 3 of them and switched to the more reasonable Viginia class.

Guess the reason this gold-plated skimmer is still being built is it's an election year, and various people need to get their "street cred" when it comes to defense.
__________________
Just say "NO" to Ethanol - Drive Diesel

Mitchell Oates
Mooresville, NC
'87 300D 212K miles
'87 300D 151K miles - R.I.P. 12/08
'05 Jeep Liberty CRD 67K miles
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-13-2012, 02:10 PM
Kuan's Avatar
unband
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: At the Birkebeiner
Posts: 3,865
I think it's badass. Why not? Everyone needs something to rally around and be proud off.
__________________
You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows - Robert A. Zimmerman
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-13-2012, 02:38 PM
retmil46's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuan View Post
I think it's badass. Why not? Everyone needs something to rally around and be proud off.
One Mk 48 torpedo and you'd have a $7 billion artificial reef.
__________________
Just say "NO" to Ethanol - Drive Diesel

Mitchell Oates
Mooresville, NC
'87 300D 212K miles
'87 300D 151K miles - R.I.P. 12/08
'05 Jeep Liberty CRD 67K miles
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-13-2012, 03:44 PM
JiveTurkey's Avatar
Nicht verantwortlich
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 919
Quote:
Originally Posted by retmil46 View Post
One Mk 48 torpedo and you'd have a $7 billion artificial reef.
Right? I didn't see a ****ing thing about submarine defense in that article. A good sub crew could take that ****er out blindfolded.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-13-2012, 04:14 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
Well as long as they work.

I just question very expensive weapons like this when what really wins wars are decent weapons in great numbers.

I rather have 12 ok ships than 3 really good ones.

They need to bring back the battleships, they had the armor protection to absorb hits that these ships just can't withstand. Slam an Exocet into the side of one of these and its going down, slam one into the Mississippi and she will probably do just fine.
__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-14-2012, 10:02 AM
Solid Snake's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy View Post
Well as long as they work.

I just question very expensive weapons like this when what really wins wars are decent weapons in great numbers.

I rather have 12 ok ships than 3 really good ones.

They need to bring back the battleships, they had the armor protection to absorb hits that these ships just can't withstand. Slam an Exocet into the side of one of these and its going down, slam one into the Mississippi and she will probably do just fine.
I have asked the same question regarding a new heavy attack ship. Instead of antiquated cannons, just slap on hundreds of missile tubes and silos and you have yourself a one stop shop for coast offense.
__________________
_______________________________________________

1987 560SEL (210,000 miles)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-13-2012, 04:16 PM
dynalow's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,599
Mitch,

I read recently the Navy is cutting out (decommissioning) 4 Ticonderoga class criusers and a few other ships including the USS Rueben James.

11 ships to be decommissioned in fiscal 2013 - Navy News | News from Afghanistan & Iraq - Navy Times

Out with the old, in with the new.

Heads Up: Big cuts coming in DEF in fy13. Enlistments will be way down next year.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-13-2012, 04:20 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
I hope they name another carrier Enterprise instead of after lame politicians no one likes.

The name Enterprise has earned a lot of battle colors.
__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-14-2012, 02:16 AM
retmil46's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 344
Quote:
Originally Posted by dynalow View Post
Mitch,

I read recently the Navy is cutting out (decommissioning) 4 Ticonderoga class criusers and a few other ships including the USS Rueben James.

11 ships to be decommissioned in fiscal 2013 - Navy News | News from Afghanistan & Iraq - Navy Times

Out with the old, in with the new.

Heads Up: Big cuts coming in DEF in fy13. Enlistments will be way down next year.
Well, I'm not too surprised they'd be decomming some of the Ticos - they started building them in the late 70's/early 80's - the first batch still had the old twin rail missle launchers instead of the later VLS (vertical launch system). Even the newest ones are probably well past the 20 year mark by now. Also, from what I remember, they were basically nothing but a Spruance destroyer hull crammed full of equipment and were considered to be an overloaded design, and given a cruiser designation simply because of the crapload of missiles they could carry.

A good many of them were built before the lessons of the Falklands War could be digested - ie, where the British learned that aluminum ship plus burning solid rocket fuel equals a VERY bad idea - and that's why the Burke class destroyers went back to good old-fashioned steel for most of the ship.
__________________
Just say "NO" to Ethanol - Drive Diesel

Mitchell Oates
Mooresville, NC
'87 300D 212K miles
'87 300D 151K miles - R.I.P. 12/08
'05 Jeep Liberty CRD 67K miles
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-13-2012, 05:54 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by retmil46 View Post
One Mk 48 torpedo and you'd have a $7 billion artificial reef.
Perfect.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-13-2012, 07:14 PM
The Clk Man's Avatar
Saved By Grace
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Heaven Bound
Posts: 123
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
Perfect.
It would probably be cheaper in the long run.
__________________
For the Saved, this world is the worst it will ever get.
For the unSaved, this world is the best it will ever get.

Clk's Ebay Stuff BUY SOMETHING NOW!!!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-13-2012, 07:18 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 176
Seawolf

The problem with the Seawolf was the cost of fabrication and major welding issues with the dissimilar metals used for the pressure hull.

My Welding Team Leader at AWS CWI was involved with the inspection of the fabrication welding and said it was way too complex for the technology available at the time. The rejection factor was insane.

The Brits also has similar issues with their version of the same design.

The cost of development of new ships is based on the failure of the Navy to lock in a design before production, instead they are going the "design-build" route.

Also the rapid changes in tech are dooming some designs before they get off the drawing board.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-13-2012, 07:28 PM
Admiral-Third World Fleet
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 3,069
Well, they are going to be insanely expensive in small lots as the R&D costs for every stinking piece is amortized over 3 boats. Not only that, I doubt that there are any parts on these boats that are competitively procured.

I bought quite a few million bux worth of nuclear propulsion equipment for the 688 fast attack class (S6G) and Ohio class (S8G) subs 30 years ago and there was precious little competition even then. We just don't have than many firms capable of doing this stuff anymore.

This isn't something we can buy from the Chinese either, since they will be the enemy...
__________________
80 300SD (129k mi) 82 240D stick (193k mi)77 240D auto - stick to be (153k mi) 85 380SL (145k mi) 89 BMW 535i 82 Diesel Rabbit Pickup (374k mi) 91 Jetta IDI Diesel (155k mi) 81 VW Rabbit Convertible Diesel 70 Triumph Spitfire Mk III (63kmi)66 Triumph TR4a IRS (90k mi)67 Ford F-100 (??)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-13-2012, 07:50 PM
anghrist's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lancaster, CA
Posts: 558
"You know, I have one simple request...and that is to have sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads. Now evidently, my cycloptic colleague informs me that that can't be done. Ah, can you please remind me what I pay you people for? Honestly, throw me a bone here...what do we have?"

__________________
2013 Volkswagen Jetta Hybrid SEL Premium (Sparky)
http://badges.fuelly.com/images/smallsig-us/193500.png


It's a car not a science experiment! Open the throttle!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-13-2012, 11:39 PM
Fulcrum525's Avatar
Sing Blue Silver
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 2,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by anghrist View Post
"You know, I have one simple request...and that is to have sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads. Now evidently, my cycloptic colleague informs me that that can't be done. Ah, can you please remind me what I pay you people for? Honestly, throw me a bone here...what do we have?"

Gotta finish it

Sea Bass.
[pause] Right.
They're mutated sea bass.
Are they ill tempered?
Absolutely.
Oh well, that's a start.



__________________
1982 300GD Carmine Red (DB3535) Cabriolet Parting Out
1990 300SEL Smoke Silver (Parting out)
1991 350SDL Blackberry Metallic (481)

"The thing is Bob, its not that I'm lazy...its that I just don't care."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page