Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 01-11-2013, 02:52 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix Arizona. Ex Durban R.S.A.
Posts: 6,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
Instead of training only potential gun owners, teach firearm safety to everyone through the use of public funding in public schools. Introduce the training at roughly the 7th grade level, and have them tested on the knowledge as part of a civics exam.
"Hunters ed". My wife had that in high school in Colorado in the 70's. Before the liberals got their panties in a wad and killed it...

- Peter.

__________________
2021 Chevrolet Spark
Formerly...
2000 GMC Sonoma
1981 240D 4spd stick. 347000 miles. Deceased Feb 14 2021
2002 Kia Rio. Worst crap on four wheels
1981 240D 4spd stick. 389000 miles.
1984 123 200
1979 116 280S
1972 Cadillac Sedan DeVille
1971 108 280S
  #32  
Old 01-11-2013, 03:05 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by elchivito View Post
You also need a license to catch a fish, but heavens no. That would "infringe" on "liberty".
Might I suggest you obtain a 1927 Funk and Wagnells dictionary and look up the term "License". Get back to us here on the forum about what you find......


LIcense
LIE
LIAR
LIcentious

notice any similarities?
  #33  
Old 01-11-2013, 03:10 PM
JB3 JB3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 7,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
With the training I've had, I doubt the chances of my shooting myself is high at all. I'm a strong advocate for proper firearms safety training, as well as proper training in the use of the firearm. I have put my children through proper firearm training through the local gun club...it's one of the requirements for being allowed to fire the weapons.

I think it would be a fine idea to institute proper firearm training for the populace...think of the lives that would be saved.

think of the lives that would be saved if people had to lock up their weapons as a general rule when not in use for specific purposes.

You are putting a lot of faith in your training only assuming it would be you who has the accident in the first place.
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
  #34  
Old 01-11-2013, 03:28 PM
jplinville's Avatar
Conservative
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio region
Posts: 302
Quote:
Originally Posted by pj67coll View Post
"Hunters ed". My wife had that in high school in Colorado in the 70's. Before the liberals got their panties in a wad and killed it...

- Peter.
I'd like to see it in all public schools as a requirement. Gun safety programs will not only teach people how to be safe around weapons, it will also teach them the reality of what can happen.
__________________
1987 560SL
85,000 miles




Meet on the level, leave on the square. Great words to live by

Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread. - Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821.
  #35  
Old 01-11-2013, 03:29 PM
jplinville's Avatar
Conservative
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio region
Posts: 302
Quote:
Originally Posted by JB3 View Post
think of the lives that would be saved if people had to lock up their weapons as a general rule when not in use for specific purposes.

You are putting a lot of faith in your training only assuming it would be you who has the accident in the first place.
You're looking for a requirement that cannot be enforced...
__________________
1987 560SL
85,000 miles




Meet on the level, leave on the square. Great words to live by

Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread. - Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821.
  #36  
Old 01-11-2013, 03:35 PM
SwampYankee's Avatar
New England Hick
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 1,501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pooka View Post
All moving vehicles require training and licensing to operate, and if you prove that you are incapable of operating them your license to operate them is revoked by the state.

You are also required by the state to carry insurance to cover any damage you or anyone else does with your vehicle.

Would the same work for gun ownership?
Considering the number of uninsured (1 in 7 back in '11) and unregistered (I can only guess the numbers are similar) vehicles on the road, licensing and insuring gun would probably have a similar outcome. How many repeat drunk drivers with suspended or revoked licenses, involved in yet another accident do we hear about? Laws work for those willing to follow them.

That's not reason enough to do nothing, just that there are always people willing to ignore the laws. I'm sure the problem could be mitigated, but never eliminated no matter how stringent.
__________________

1980 300TD-China Blue/Blue MBTex-2nd Owner, 107K (Alt Blau) OBK #15
'06 Chevy Tahoe Z71 (for the wife & 4 kids, current mule) '03 Honda Odyssey (son #1's ride, reluctantly) '99 GMC Suburban (255K+ miles, semi-retired mule) 21' SeaRay Seville (summer escape pod)
  #37  
Old 01-11-2013, 04:29 PM
JB3 JB3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 7,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
You're looking for a requirement that cannot be enforced...
why not?

seems mild to me, get a safe if you have a gun.

The real issue here with the whole gun control debate is that there is zero compromise with 2nd amendment proponents. I don't want to take all your guns (or I know that would never happen), but im having a hard time seeing the bother you would have meeting some better registration and safety restrictions to own them.
You may be extremely confident in your personal ability and in the abilities of your kids, but why should the general public agree with you, especially when the safety issue could potentially affect the general public as well? What have you done to demonstrate how safe and educated you are to the general public?

Im sure mother Lanza thought her kid was trained up nice until he killed her, then shot 30 other people. Not saying something as horrible as that could or would ever happen in your situation, but for every guy in your shoes who is completely confident of his personal and family training, there is always a percentage who are completely wrong, and then other people often get to pay for that mistake.
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
  #38  
Old 01-11-2013, 05:14 PM
jplinville's Avatar
Conservative
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio region
Posts: 302
Quote:
Originally Posted by JB3 View Post
why not?

seems mild to me, get a safe if you have a gun.

The real issue here with the whole gun control debate is that there is zero compromise with 2nd amendment proponents. I don't want to take all your guns (or I know that would never happen), but im having a hard time seeing the bother you would have meeting some better registration and safety restrictions to own them.
You may be extremely confident in your personal ability and in the abilities of your kids, but why should the general public agree with you, especially when the safety issue could potentially affect the general public as well? What have you done to demonstrate how safe and educated you are to the general public?

Im sure mother Lanza thought her kid was trained up nice until he killed her, then shot 30 other people. Not saying something as horrible as that could or would ever happen in your situation, but for every guy in your shoes who is completely confident of his personal and family training, there is always a percentage who are completely wrong, and then other people often get to pay for that mistake.
How do you propose compliance with usage of the safe?? Simply owning a safe does not guarantee usage of the safe.

The real problem here is control of crazy nutjobs...not guns.

As for registering my firearms...it's none of your damned business what guns I own. There's a paper in NY that has publishes lists gun owners already...what's going to stop the list of those registered, LAWFUL gun owners from being published as well?
__________________
1987 560SL
85,000 miles




Meet on the level, leave on the square. Great words to live by

Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread. - Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821.
  #39  
Old 01-11-2013, 05:52 PM
Pooka
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 664
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
I'd like to see it in all public schools as a requirement. Gun safety programs will not only teach people how to be safe around weapons, it will also teach them the reality of what can happen.
This was offered at the elementary school I went to in Texas. It was a course for 6th graders that you could take if your parents allowed it. I don't know anyone whose parents objected.

Some old guy taught my older brother and he taught me. There were a lot of WW 2 Vet's around at the time, so instructors were easy to find.

We lived out in the country, so guns were something we used to kill snakes and skunks and other creatures that could harm us. They were also handy for putting something on the table.

Guns are tools, not toys, and I was taught to always think of them in that way.
  #40  
Old 01-11-2013, 05:58 PM
Pooka
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 664
Quote:
Originally Posted by SwampYankee View Post
Considering the number of uninsured (1 in 7 back in '11) and unregistered (I can only guess the numbers are similar) vehicles on the road, licensing and insuring gun would probably have a similar outcome. How many repeat drunk drivers with suspended or revoked licenses, involved in yet another accident do we hear about? Laws work for those willing to follow them.

That's not reason enough to do nothing, just that there are always people willing to ignore the laws. I'm sure the problem could be mitigated, but never eliminated no matter how stringent.
So because a solution is not 100% we should just sit back and throw up our hands and do nothing?

A good first step is to define the problem. A lot of gun owners are even opposed to this, but how can you solve a problem unless you define it? I don't think any action should be taken because it is better than doing nothing. We should figure out what we hope to accomplish and what is standing in our way before we jump on our horse and ride off in all directions.

The first step to reducing drunk driving is education and that is one of the reason accidents due to drunk driving have been going down for the last 30 years. Education changes public perception, and according to some young people I know drunk driving is not a cool thing to do.

Drinking? Yeah, that's still cool. But not the driving while drunk part.
  #41  
Old 01-11-2013, 06:03 PM
JB3 JB3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 7,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
How do you propose compliance with usage of the safe?? Simply owning a safe does not guarantee usage of the safe.

The real problem here is control of crazy nutjobs...not guns.

As for registering my firearms...it's none of your damned business what guns I own. There's a paper in NY that has publishes lists gun owners already...what's going to stop the list of those registered, LAWFUL gun owners from being published as well?

thats been debated to death already on this forum. Easy, if your gun ends up used in a crime, you get charged as well, unless you can demonstrate that the gun was correctly stored.

How fast do you think people would be locking up weapons if they knew they were in for charges as well if it gets misused?

Actually, its exactly my damn business what guns you own if your gun ownership stands to impact my life as well. I see no problem with a published list of lawful gun owners, plenty of people already have their names and addresses in a phone book. Whats the huge difference? Good idea
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
  #42  
Old 01-11-2013, 06:03 PM
jplinville's Avatar
Conservative
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio region
Posts: 302
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pooka View Post
This was offered at the elementary school I went to in Texas. It was a course for 6th graders that you could take if your parents allowed it. I don't know anyone whose parents objected.

Some old guy taught my older brother and he taught me. There were a lot of WW 2 Vet's around at the time, so instructors were easy to find.

We lived out in the country, so guns were something we used to kill snakes and skunks and other creatures that could harm us. They were also handy for putting something on the table.

Guns are tools, not toys, and I was taught to always think of them in that way.
Easy now...you'll upset the PETA crowd.
__________________
1987 560SL
85,000 miles




Meet on the level, leave on the square. Great words to live by

Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread. - Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821.
  #43  
Old 01-11-2013, 06:03 PM
Pooka
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 664
A friend of mine had a gun safe. And it was a good one.

One day he came home and noticed his back door was unlocked. He also heard a lot of banging coming from inside. So he went to a neighbor's house, used the phone, and called the Cops.

They showed up and arrested several very tired crooks that had been slamming away for a few hours on his safe.

So gun safes work if you use them. When he bought a new one the locksmith he bought it from said any safe can be broken into if you have enough time, but if you don't have one then it is a sure bet that a crook will find them and they will be gone in seconds.
  #44  
Old 01-11-2013, 06:30 PM
Dubyagee's Avatar
All fields are required
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SE
Posts: 8,722
Lock the crazy guy in a safe and leave the guns free.
  #45  
Old 01-11-2013, 06:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 77
Loganville mom shoots suspect 5 times, escapes with her 2 children - Atlanta Crime | Examiner.com

See? All you need is a revolver. More than one person will never try to attack you, cept Hitler, lol, redneck haha, ted noguent.

Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page