![]() |
|
|
|
|
View Poll Results: Which drivetrain do you prefer? | |||
RWD |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
29 | 76.32% |
AWD |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 26.32% |
FWD |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 7.89% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 38. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Do you prefer RWD, AWD, or FWD?
Question sparked by the "So much for AWD" thread. I haven't driven anything besides FWD, but I've heard that RWD is more fun than FWD. I'm curious what you folks think, and I'd be interested to hear why you prefer what drivetrain.
__________________
"Senior Luna, your sense of humor is still loco... but we love it, anyway." -rickymay ____ "Your sense of humor is still loco... ![]() 1982 300SD -- 211k, Texas car, tranny issues ____ 1979 240D 4-speed 234k -- turbo and tuned IP, third world taxi hot rod ![]() 2 Samuel 12:13: "David said to Nathan, “I have sinned against the Lord.” And Nathan said to David, “The Lord also has put away your sin; you shall not die." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I live in a mountainous region that sees a fair amount of snow and ice in the winter. If I'm not driving uphill, it's because I'm driving downhill. Daily driver? AWD, please.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Depends on what you are trying to do.
For me RWD>AWD>FWD.
__________________
-Justin 91 560 SEC AMG - other dogs dd 01 Honda S2000 - dogs dd 07 MB ML320 CDI - dd 16 Lexus IS250 - wifes dd it's automatic. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
You are trying to wear Depends®?
![]()
__________________
For the Saved, this world is the worst it will ever get. For the unSaved, this world is the best it will ever get. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
exactly.
FWD is the least fun of them all. Four wheel is the most fun off road and in conditions too extreme for rear wheel. Rear wheel is great most all the time.
__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST 1983 300SD - 305000 1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000 1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000 ![]() https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I've enjoyed excellent examples of FWD (Audi, Honda, Toyota) and RWD (Sunbeam, Mercedes). Many say AWD is superior, but the added drag and weight reduces fuel-mileage, and it typically requires more complex & expensive maintenance & repair.
With the older vehicles I drive, simpler is better. As I don't live in a remote, snowy, mountainous area, and I don't have a job that requires my being there regardless of the weather, FWD is sufficient. Happy Motoring, Mark
__________________
DrDKW Last edited by Mark DiSilvestro; 04-20-2013 at 07:28 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
RWD unless I'm dealing with >6" of snow or mud on a frequent basis.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar. 83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 401,xxx miles 08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 26,xxx miles 88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress. 99 Mazda Miata 183,xxx miles. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
I do an average of 40-60 trips a year into fairly extreme snow and icy conditions. I tend to chase snow storms.
And then there is the seemingly endless rain the rest of the year. Given this, it’s not terribly surprising that I’ve driven my 4-matic SUV 2x the miles of my rwd 2wd over the same time span. It’s good to have 2 MB vehicles. ![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Who picked FWD, and more importantly, why?
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar. 83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 401,xxx miles 08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 26,xxx miles 88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress. 99 Mazda Miata 183,xxx miles. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Why not? I didn't, but the (FWD) Fiat 500 that I rented was pretty damn awesome to drive!
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
I haven't been too impressed with most of the FWD cars I've driven. The Ford Focus and Acura Integra were okay, but I didn't care for any of the others I've tried. I keep hoping for a Fiat 500 every time I'm authorized a rental, but I've never gotten anything good. I get another chance later this month when I start my annual training. Wish me luck.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar. 83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 401,xxx miles 08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 26,xxx miles 88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress. 99 Mazda Miata 183,xxx miles. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
![]() This being said, I also test drove one with a stick shift. The guy took my license, copied it, and said "be back by closing time today - 5 pm." (It was noon.) |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
RWD is the best, AWD when done well is ok.
I'll never own another FWD vehicle if I can help it. I just don't like the dynamics of FWD.
__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT 1969 280SE 2023 Ram 1500 2007 Tiara 3200 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Very many years ago, after owning a few RWD cars (Mercedes 180, Hillman Minx, Opel Kadet), I acquired my first FWD car - a 1972 Audi Super-90 wagon. Compared to the older vehicles, that car was a revalation. Along with the FWD, it featured 4-wheel torsion-bar suspension, and inboard front disc-brakes for a superb ride, handling & traction, though it was trouble-prone.
Later I owned an '84 Honda Accord that was much like the Audi, except better equipped (AC, power-steering), more refined and much more reliable. Since then, I've also owned a number of RWD cars that were also excellent, including a couple Fintails, a couple W114/115 sedans, a bunch of 123 diesels, a Ford Cortina GT and a Sunbeam Alpine. My current daily-driver is a '96 4-cyl Camry. Yeah, I can hear all the groans of "soul-less and boring"! But for me, driving excitement isn't my sole criteria. In everyday, normal driving, some of the Mercedes I've owned are equal or better in certain respects. But the Camry is still a very nice car in it's own right - comfortable, reliable, reasonably easy to work on and find parts for, plus excellent fuel-economy, with better traction in snowy conditions than most RWD vehicles. Besides, having the Toyota, I can avoid subjecting my Benzes to all that road-salt! Happy Motoring, Mark
__________________
DrDKW |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
For me, I prefer RWD for the way I drive. In the snow or poor traction conditions, I definitely go slower so it doesn't matter. I also use snow tires during snow season. Since my performance car is going to be RWD and I have driven that in the snow, I like to keep all my vehicles consistent so that I can approximate how they will work instead of changing things around
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke 99 E300 Turbodiesel 91 Vette with 383 motor 05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI 06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI 03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red 03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow 04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler 11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|