![]() |
I do try to hold myself to a higher standard than some.;)
|
Quote:
You were given infractions solely for trolling. Nothing else. And, you damn well knew you were trolling when you posted the threads. Now, you are free to troll anytime you wish because the rule against trolling is not enforced. If you were "poked, tormented, and castigated" it was not by Chris or myself. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You mistreated me off-forum via PMs AND on other websites. In short - you are A TROLL. I stated once that you did nothing wrong to me - the reason I did so, was because you had the absolute power of a Moderator at the time......in short, I would have said you were the greatest person in the world on-forum to have you leave me alone, Brian.... You accused me personally of causing the 2008 stock market crash - via PM. You pranked my membership here on PP by closing my account with excessive Infractions - all to TERRORIZE ME. You stalked me on BenzWorld by trolling the sale ad of my '99 E300D - just to harrass me. I had to report you to BenzWorld to get your trolling post off my for sale ad. AT TIMES, you're not a stable individual to deal with, Brian. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
This is too bizarre to even comment on. Again, I challenge you to prove any of it. Quote:
Again, let see if you can support the allegation. Quote:
Delusional..........that's all I can say to you. |
Quote:
Nothing will change with the passage of time what you did via PM while a Moderator to harrass me here on PP, Brian. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
FYI
Quote:
This thread itself is SPECIFICALLY forbidden in the TOU... automatic ban of the member starting a thread specifically to complain about moderation. TOU violation, a consistent pattern of abusive behavior to members and moderators. . |
"I simply wish to make note that Tom Walgamuth's thread about Obama stating that you can keep your policy if you want............was locked without the slightest bit of support based upon the TOU.
The most vociferous arguments on the thread came from one of the moderators. Proof yet again about the arbitrary nature of the moderation here." I have quoted in full Brian's original post on this thread and would simply say that it appears to me to be more a request for supporting evidence for the closing. As stated it was my original thread which I asked to be closed that has precipitated all this so I feel somewhat responsible. I'd also have to say that BC's criticism of the mods in this case was pretty mild. It seems a shame for it to result in a ban expecially since it was due to a misunderstanding of what had happened (my requesting the thread closed). I would respectfully request that you all reconsider your banning of BC. |
I don't get it. If it is not for fun then why come here?
In my case, with me and the people I occasionally bump heads with, I think the mods have been more than fair and have taken a live and let live approach to the job. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website