|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
10-05-2014, 03:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Dieseldog....from Kentucky, had a 240 d. Swore the 115 cars handled better than the 123 and were lighter. I sold him a used radiator once for a 240.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.  [SIGPIC]..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis. 
|
|
#2
10-05-2014, 04:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Individual circumstances as well as interests change. Unfortunatly sickness and the grim reaper also can be a factor.
Then someone may have a new lady and horizontal jogging is consuming or replacing the keyboard time. Have to agree the 114s seem at least more agile with the gas engines. Them being lighter than diesel 115s and 123s may be is the reason. Much the same way in my opinion the 240d with a manual box seems lighter handling than a 300d.
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
