You guys notice that cars moving from smooth and oval shaped lights and fenders to a more stealth bomber kinda look?

__________________
You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows - Robert A. Zimmerman

Certainly not in the Mercedes lines. The design issue at the front is pedestrian impact safety rather than aerodynamics or radar resistance.

They should stop planning to run peeps over

CTS yes definately

__________________
BENZ THERE DONE THAThttp://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/...c/progress.gif
15 VW Passat TDI
00 E420
98 E300 DT
97 E420 Donor Car - NEED PARTS? PM ME!
97 S500
97 E300D
86 Holden Jackaroo Turbo D
86 300SDL
(o\|/o)

When was the last time a Caddy had curves?

mid/late-'90s Deville and Fleetwood were somewhat curvy.

__________________
"Senior Luna, your sense of humor is still loco... but we love it, anyway." -rickymay ____ "Your sense of humor is still loco... " -MBeige ____ "Señor Luna, your sense of humor is quite järjetön" -Delibes

1982 300SD -- 211k, Texas car, tranny issues ____ 1979 240D 4-speed 234k -- turbo and tuned IP, third world taxi hot rod

2 Samuel 12:13: "David said to Nathan, “I have sinned against the Lord.” And Nathan said to David, “The Lord also has put away your sin; you shall not die."

That's what the video and radar automated braking systems are supposed to take care of.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ols5aUOL13s

Not sure -- in a city, you drive very near to pedestrians. If one steps in front of you, there likely wouldn't be time to stop, automated braking or not. You'll still need pedestrian-impact friendly design.

That, and do the brake lights illuminate when the auto brake engages? A whole lot of rear enders if they do not.

My understanding is they do, sometimes in a panic braking situation the 3rd brake light flashes rapidly to alert those in the back (if they are paying attention).

If not then that'll be a test of the angular rear body work design against whatever kind of car design is in the back...

__________________
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7271/7...144c3fc1dc.jpg

cars are nice, but im really a truck guy, and the opposite is true about the pickups-GM in particular. They decided they would push the brick.

Infiniti begs to differ .

Are Infinitis the only cars that have gotten curvier over the last 15 years? Toyota was getting curvier, but did a switcheroo in the last few years.

EDIT: There's also Honda. The Civic, Accord, Odyssey, and Pilot are all curvier than they were 10-15 years ago.

__________________
"Senior Luna, your sense of humor is still loco... but we love it, anyway." -rickymay ____ "Your sense of humor is still loco... " -MBeige ____ "Señor Luna, your sense of humor is quite järjetön" -Delibes

1982 300SD -- 211k, Texas car, tranny issues ____ 1979 240D 4-speed 234k -- turbo and tuned IP, third world taxi hot rod

2 Samuel 12:13: "David said to Nathan, “I have sinned against the Lord.” And Nathan said to David, “The Lord also has put away your sin; you shall not die."

And Mazda.

http://jalopnik.com/is-mazdas-sports-car-concept-the-new-rx-7-weve-been-wai-1733761746

I have a feeling that car is going to look great (albeit a concept). I think most of the angular look has come from GM. It works for the caddies but fails miserably with the Acadia and terrain and those soccer mom mobiles. Hell, my Saturn could definitely be considered very angular.


Sent from an abacus

__________________
TC
Current stable:
- 2004 Mazda RALLYWANKEL
- 2007 Saturn sky redline
- 2004 Explorer...under surgery.

Past: 135i, GTI, 300E, 300SD, 300SD, Stealth

That looks sexy.

__________________
1979 Black on Black, 300CD (sold), 1990 Black 300SE, Silver 1989 Volvo 780, 1988 300CE (vanished by the hands of a girlfriend), 1992 300CE (Rescue).

It would suit me if cars moved away from the current 'organic reptile' kinda look, back to 'form follows function', with practical interior/cargo room and minimal blind spots!

Happy Motoring, Mark

__________________
DrDKW