Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-22-2010, 11:54 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,915
Formula Ford

I am on the verge of buying a forumula ford to use for autocross. The one I have currently focused on is an 85 Reynard.

FF have a 1.6 kent engine. That was the standard engine in the old Pinto. Hopped up a bit with a two barrell carb they put out about 104 hp and in autocross gearing supposedly will go zero to 60 in about five seconds (prolly with someone lighter than me).

It is a pretty nifty little race car which looks a lot like an Indy car with small wheels and no wings. Every thing you would ever want to is adjustable.

I am pumped.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-23-2010, 03:36 AM
LarryBible
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sounds like a real kick in the A$$!

The bang for the buck in the Formula Ford and Formula V is quite good. I'm only vaguely familiar with all these classes, but I think what makes the Formula Ford so much better is that you have quite a bit bigger tire patch.

My BIL used to crew chief for a guy in Formula Mazda. The power to weight of these small race cars makes them really fun to drive.

Enjoy and keep us posted.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-23-2010, 04:03 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
I'm surprised those engines got "over there" I thought they were strictly European - well it just goes to show - you live and learn.

If you get one put up some pictures please - better still make a video with your camera mounted just next to the front wheel and give it some stick!
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-23-2010, 04:09 AM
LarryBible
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Army View Post
I'm surprised those engines got "over there" I thought they were strictly European - well it just goes to show - you live and learn.

If you get one put up some pictures please - better still make a video with your camera mounted just next to the front wheel and give it some stick!
These engines were used in the Pinto, the Mustang II and the early Fox bodied Mustangs as well as the small Ford Ranger pickup in the US.

They had a bad reputation which I think was somewhat undeserved. In their early days, we didn't have oil as good as we have today. If oil was not kept changed, it gunked up the camshaft and caused problems. The camlobes were lubed through the center of the camshaft, at least on the early ones.

If they were maintained reasonably, they actually were pretty durable engines for the money.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-23-2010, 09:15 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryBible View Post
These engines were used in the Pinto, the Mustang II and the early Fox bodied Mustangs as well as the small Ford Ranger pickup in the US.
not these engines.
your thinking of the 2300cc engines.the later ones in rangers had 8 spark plugs.the valve cover looped over the end cam journals.and they threw timing belts like candy in the winter.if they ever did use em in pinto's mustangs etc i never saw one.which was kinda weird as whenever i called for parts they asked if it was a 2000 or 2300.but i never in 18 yrs saw a 2000cc engine.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-23-2010, 03:28 PM
Registered Shadetree
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 676
Quote:
Originally Posted by catmandoo62 View Post
not these engines.
your thinking of the 2300cc engines.the later ones in rangers had 8 spark plugs.the valve cover looped over the end cam journals.and they threw timing belts like candy in the winter.if they ever did use em in pinto's mustangs etc i never saw one.which was kinda weird as whenever i called for parts they asked if it was a 2000 or 2300.but i never in 18 yrs saw a 2000cc engine.

I always heard the Kent 1600* wound up in early Pintos. Never really checked it out, though.





*FFs are 1600 -- their big brothers with wings and things, Formula Continental, used the early 2000s and have since gone to a newer 2 liter Ford powerplant. Zetec or something like that.
__________________
____________
1998 E300 +310,000K
1996 E300 +460,000K


Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-23-2010, 03:36 PM
Registered Shadetree
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 676
And speaking of Ford-powered 2-liter racecars, my all-time favorite and the class I would've raced had I been rich is S2.

S2/Sports2000:







__________________
____________
1998 E300 +310,000K
1996 E300 +460,000K


Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-23-2010, 05:20 PM
MS Fowler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Littlestown PA ( 6 miles south of Gettysburg)
Posts: 2,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Ladd View Post
I always heard the Kent 1600* wound up in early Pintos. Never really checked it out, though.

*FFs are 1600 -- their big brothers with wings and things, Formula Continental, used the early 2000s and have since gone to a newer 2 liter Ford powerplant. Zetec or something like that.
According to the Standard Catalog of American Cars, ( 1971)"Pintos were available with either a British-built 1600CC overhead valve four cylinder engine or a second, more powerful ( and much more popular) German-built 2000cc engine which was also a four" 1600cc 98 cid 3.19X 3.06 CR 8.4:1, 75 Brake HP at 5000 rpm, 5 main bearings.
The same engine was carried over into 1972, rated at net 54 HP. The engine was not offered in 1973 domestic products.


The drop from 75 gross to 54 net HP is revealing!
The engine described in a post above was the 2300 OH CAM, the Kent engine is a push rod one.
__________________
1982 300SD " Wotan" ..On the road as of Jan 8, 2007 with Historic Tags
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-23-2010, 04:37 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
I agree - though most European Ford engines of that vintage were prone to that familiar camshaft ticking sound that indicated a lack of maintenance... to be fair the same can be said for Opels, Renaults, Citroens, and Audis of that era
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-23-2010, 06:15 AM
MS Fowler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Littlestown PA ( 6 miles south of Gettysburg)
Posts: 2,278
Go for it, Tom.
__________________
1982 300SD " Wotan" ..On the road as of Jan 8, 2007 with Historic Tags
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-23-2010, 06:33 AM
KarTek's Avatar
<- Ryuko of Kill La Kill
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bahama/Eno Twp, NC
Posts: 3,258
That should be a fun ride, Tom! I had a 1980 Ford Fiesta with the Kent engine that I autocrossed and rallied all through college.

I messed with the engine a bit and it was always a solid performer. I remember buying a spare head at the junk yard so I could port it. One side or the other had a terrible break in the flow that could be smoothed into a "trumpet" like shape.
__________________
-Evan


Benz Fleet:
1968 UNIMOG 404.114
1998 E300
2008 E63


Non-Benz Fleet:
1992 Aerostar
1993 MR2
2000 F250
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-23-2010, 08:25 AM
Registered Shadetree
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 676
I used to race CF (Club Ford) in SCCA. I had a '76 Hawke FF that was an absolute blast to race. I never autocrossed, but threw in the 'cross gearset one day for giggles. Neck-snapping acceleration.

From my experience with an obsolete mark of which very few were made, the more common Reynard would be a better choice. I always had to fabricate parts every time I crashed. (Yes it's racing kids -- every once in a while you hit something or someone hits you.)

I was racing in the early 2000s. Back then, the Crossle chassis were the defacto Club Ford terrors. In Formula Ford, both the Swift DB-6 and the late-model Van Diemans typically wound up on the podium. Parts were abundant for these makes.

Not sure what the heat is nowadays.
__________________
____________
1998 E300 +310,000K
1996 E300 +460,000K


Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-23-2010, 08:53 AM
toomany MBZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: central Va
Posts: 7,820
Have a good time and keep us posted.
__________________
83 SD

84 CD
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-23-2010, 09:01 AM
Registered Shadetree
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 676
Sorry, Swift DB-1 (DB-6 was it's Formula Continental brother)

__________________
____________
1998 E300 +310,000K
1996 E300 +460,000K


Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-23-2010, 09:47 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,915
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Ladd View Post
Sorry, Swift DB-1 (DB-6 was it's Formula Continental brother)

The swift chassis is a lovely design. The Reynard is pretty too but not as much as the swift. The swifts though are a lot newer and a lot more $.

Tom
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page