Boost questions on OM606... - Page 3 - PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

kynsi · #1 11-16-2007, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KarTek

OK, thanks. So my questions are:

1. Can these mods be done to my 606 turbo IP?

2. If not, can the other 606 IP be adapted to the Turbo 606?

Thanks again! Sorry for the stupid questions... I'm a fast learner though!

1. yes (lots of work)

2. yes

If someone knows a topic of 606/603 engine build, there are more answers to KarTek.

KarTek · #2 11-16-2007, 12:08 PM

Thanks for the help! So there IS a difference between the non-turbo and the turbo 606 IP?

kynsi · #3 11-17-2007, 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KarTek

Thanks for the help! So there IS a difference between the non-turbo and the turbo 606 IP?

No, i ment both need work. No engine openig have to do.

KarTek · #4 11-18-2007, 08:58 PM

OK, thanks again!

altz · #5 11-20-2007, 01:16 PM

By the way what are your 1/4 mile times with 400hp diesel engines in w124 and w201?

kynsi · #6 11-20-2007, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by altz

By the way what are your 1/4 mile times with 400hp diesel engines in w124 and w201?

http://www2.kauhajoki.fi/route67cc/

clic "Tulokset"
no.62
Only time in quarter mile.(this is my daily car)

Deni · #7 11-20-2007, 06:24 PM

Reaction-Time, 60ft, quarter mile, trap speed

62 Sorvoja Tommi Mercedes 190 Diesel 0,7111 2,8896 15,4274 182,4628
62 Sorvoja Tommi Mercedes 190 Diesel 1,0462 2,4648 15,594 178,1324
62 Sorvoja Tommi Mercedes 190 Diesel 0,9122 2,398 15,3314 179,505
62 Sorvoja Tommi Mercedes 190 Diesel 0,7411 2,3595 13,6068 183,7955
62 Sorvoja Tommi Mercedes 190 Diesel 3,1322 2,6563 14,8052 178,651
62 Sorvoja Tommi Mercedes 190 Diesel 0,9387 2,1192 13,9335 169,2121

Deni · #8 11-20-2007, 06:27 PM

There's something wrong with your times. They're too high.

altz · #9 11-21-2007, 08:58 AM

jep second that...
400hp and lots of torqe and only 13.5?
The car should do low 12-s IMO...
no traction?

gsxr · #10 11-21-2007, 10:31 AM

My E500 (which weighs around 3900 lbs, and has about 350hp at the crank) will run a 60-foot time around 2.1, with trap time of 13.9 @ 101mph (162 kmh).

It looks like the problem with this 190D is traction, especially after looking at this run:

2.3595 (60 foot)
13.6068 (ET)
183.7955 (trap speed)

The 60-foot time is very slow, the ET is ok, but the trap speed is incredible (114mph!). The 114mph trap speed does indicate around 400hp at the crank. Most of the other runs also indicate a poor launch or traction problems, but definitely lots of top-end power. Time to mount some slicks, or drag radials, to make it hook up...!

#11 11-21-2007, 06:27 PM

Traction and turbo lag.

The Finns have said the 400hp cars are often faster than the 500 hp cars simply because their turbo spools faster.

Deni · #12 11-22-2007, 03:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForcedInduction

Traction and turbo lag.

The Finns have said the 400hp cars are often faster than the 500 hp cars simply because their turbo spools faster.

Time for a vn turbo

.

kynsi · #13 11-22-2007, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by altz

jep second that...
400hp and lots of torqe and only 13.5?
The car should do low 12-s IMO...
no traction?

There is also one video. In link I send earlier. Video no.3 of 13.07.07.

And there is not big lag whith hx40.

altz · #14 12-08-2007, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kynsi

There is also one video. In link I send earlier. Video no.3 of 13.07.07.

And there is not big lag whith hx40.

But what elements to you use in the pump? They have said to be 7mm, but where do you get them? From somekind other car pump? Truck?

altz · #15 12-12-2007, 11:08 AM

anyone?