Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-13-2005, 08:24 PM
whunter's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 17,416
Lightbulb K+N Filters are a bad idea for diesel engines.

The K&N filter issue has been covered many times, and in depth.

My 300SD... Aaron says its "destoyed" (chrome wheels)
http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/mercedes-benz-wheels-tires/117835-my-300sd-aaron-says-its-destoyed-chrome-wheels.html#post840084

K&N Filter Efficiency Tests
K&N Filter Efficiency Tests

K&N for the OM603
http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/diesel-discussion/104986-k-n-om603.html#post721322

K+N Filters - for a Diesel ??
http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/diesel-discussion/103562-k-n-filters-diesel.html#post710523

Air Intake Mod....
http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/diesel-discussion/63464-air-intake-mod-post984631.html?posted=1#post984631

__________________
ASE Master Mechanic
asemastermechanic@juno.com

Prototype R&D/testing:
Thermal & Aerodynamic System Engineering (TASE) Senior vehicle instrumentation technician.
Noise Vibration and Harshness (NVH).
Dynamometer.
Heat exchanger durability.
HV-A/C Climate Control.
Vehicle build.
Fleet Durability
Technical Quality Auditor.
Automotive Technical Writer

1985 300SD
1983 300D
1984 190D
2003 Volvo V70
2002 Honda Civic

https://www.boldegoist.com/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-13-2005, 09:29 PM
H-townbenzoboy's Avatar
Now Y2K Compliant
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,338
In the words of Homer Simpson, "That's what I've been trying to TELL you!" Thanks for the valuable links. I knew I was correct in my assumptions.
__________________
'81 MB 300SD, '82 MB 300D Turbo (sold/RIP), '04 Lincoln Town Car Ultimate

Sooner or later every car falls apart, ours does it later!
-German Narrator in a MB Promotion Film about the then brand new W123.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-13-2005, 10:18 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
Yep waste of money for these cars at least.
__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-13-2005, 11:07 PM
oldnavy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SwampEast MO
Posts: 1,695
Funny thing about most of the people on the Magnum forum that use the K&N filters, they don't plan on owning the car long time. Most are probably trading cars every 2 to 4 years and are not concerned about possible engine damage, it about the "sound" of proformance.
__________________
'10 Chrysler T&C Stow-N-Go White. Grandpa's ride.

'13 Chrysler 200 Touring Candy Red. Grandma's ride.

Age and cunning will always over come youth and vigor.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-14-2005, 12:26 AM
dunl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sylvan Lake, Alberta,CANADA (1.5 hr from Calgary)
Posts: 940
They're bad for any engine....they let it too much dirt.

If you use one, put a paper filter behind it and se how much dirt it catches that the K&N didn't.
__________________
79 300SD - $50 out of pocket purchase
03 Dodge Ram 3500 CTD
2003 VW Jetta TDI
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-14-2005, 12:32 AM
Matt SD300's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 276
Yep, Just hold one up to the light...........See for yourself.

Lots of holes in the filter for dirt to come thru!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
Matt (SD,CA)

1984 300SD.. White/Chrome Bunts..Green

1997 2500 Dodge Ram 5.9 Cummins 12 Valve 36 PSI of Boost = 400+hp & 800+tQ .. ..Greenspeed

2004 Dodge Ram 2500 4x4 Quad Cab Cummins 5.9 H.O "596hp/1225tq" 6 spd. Man. Leather Heated seats/Loaded..Flame Red....GREENSPEED

Global warming...Doing my part, Smokin da hippies..

Fight the good fight!......
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-14-2005, 02:39 AM
invol's Avatar
illegal alien
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ventura, CA
Posts: 100
If not K&N, then what...

If the K&N filters are as bad as people say they are, is there any kind of alternative? Eventually, I would like to remove the airbox and use something smaller (i.e. cone-style or equivilent size). I'm not wanting to do it for the extra 0.082145 HP, but rather for the extra room it would afford me for another project. Seeing as 190s are not well-endowed in the "wide open engine spaces" department, every little bit of extra breathing room I can get will definately help me out.

Any suggestions?
__________________
The stable, er, 1 horse :
1987 190D 2.5 Turbo (running well, and bloody-well better since it's the only car I have now)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-14-2005, 03:34 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Palm Springs, CA
Posts: 166
I'm going to defend K&N a little bit here from the typical bashing they often recieve on forums. Why don't you put a secondary filter behind a paper filter or the OEM filter and look at the copious amount of dirt it collects. Dirt gets past any filter. If you don't believe me check out this link. http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/airfilter/airtest3.htm

Yes, K&N filters let in slightly more dirt than an OEM; I should say very, very slightly. It won't make any diference to the oil or the motor. Oil is designed to deal with a certain amount of dirt, and using a K&N filter is not going to bring the oil over the dirt-threshold point.

Just look at the secondary filter in the tests with a paper filter; it's filthy with dirt. Just think about all the dirt that is getting into your engine with your oem filter. Surely your engine can't survive with all that dirt grinding around in the engine can it? Tired of K&N bashing...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-14-2005, 08:15 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: RI shore
Posts: 2,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldnavy
Funny thing about most of the people on the Magnum forum that use the K&N filters, they don't plan on owning the car long time. Most are probably trading cars every 2 to 4 years and are not concerned about possible engine damage, it about the "sound" of proformance.
My sentiments exactly - which is why I would never buy a vehicle that is pimped - unless it was for parts.
__________________
'82 300SD - 361K mi - "Blue"

"Good judgement comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement."

listen, look, .........and duck.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-14-2005, 09:00 AM
oldnavy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SwampEast MO
Posts: 1,695
Quote:
Originally Posted by wols0003
I'm going to defend K&N a little bit here from the typical bashing they often recieve on forums. Why don't you put a secondary filter behind a paper filter or the OEM filter and look at the copious amount of dirt it collects. Dirt gets past any filter. If you don't believe me check out this link. http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/airfilter/airtest3.htm

Yes, K&N filters let in slightly more dirt than an OEM; I should say very, very slightly. It won't make any diference to the oil or the motor. Oil is designed to deal with a certain amount of dirt, and using a K&N filter is not going to bring the oil over the dirt-threshold point.

Just look at the secondary filter in the tests with a paper filter; it's filthy with dirt. Just think about all the dirt that is getting into your engine with your oem filter. Surely your engine can't survive with all that dirt grinding around in the engine can it? Tired of K&N bashing...
Bob's reasearch is very simplistic and does not measure the particle content passing the filter, it is as he basically says just an eyeball check. It's like looking at two dirty oil filters and and saying one is dirtier then the other, thus one filter is better then other filter. That is rather laughable to say the least, and I'm glad the mfg's of our cars don't design our cars that way.

Forgot to add that the ISO testing of any OEM filter will almost 100% of the time be better then aftermarket products. The Mfg standards are higher in almost 100% of cases then the aftermarket products because aftermarket mfg's do not want to spend the extra $'s to have equal or more efficient filter made when all they have to do is say they are better knowing there is no law against their statements as has been proven in various cout cases. One case was Mobil suing Castroil for advertizing their oil to be synthetic, because in fact it is not. Mobil lost the case as the judge ruled that word synthetic was just a advertizing type of trademark and not a discription of an oil. In other words the judge did not believe there is such a thing as synthetic oil. Go figure.
__________________
'10 Chrysler T&C Stow-N-Go White. Grandpa's ride.

'13 Chrysler 200 Touring Candy Red. Grandma's ride.

Age and cunning will always over come youth and vigor.

Last edited by oldnavy; 09-14-2005 at 09:13 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-14-2005, 09:17 AM
dannym's Avatar
I'm not here
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Deltona, Florida
Posts: 2,360
Quote:
Originally Posted by wols0003
I'm going to defend K&N a little bit here from the typical bashing they often recieve on forums. Why don't you put a secondary filter behind a paper filter or the OEM filter and look at the copious amount of dirt it collects. Dirt gets past any filter. If you don't believe me check out this link. http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/airfilter/airtest3.htm

Yes, K&N filters let in slightly more dirt than an OEM; I should say very, very slightly. It won't make any diference to the oil or the motor. Oil is designed to deal with a certain amount of dirt, and using a K&N filter is not going to bring the oil over the dirt-threshold point.

Just look at the secondary filter in the tests with a paper filter; it's filthy with dirt. Just think about all the dirt that is getting into your engine with your oem filter. Surely your engine can't survive with all that dirt grinding around in the engine can it? Tired of K&N bashing...
Most medium efficiency commercial filters are 20/20 meaning they will catch 20% of particles over 20 microns.
I think the best you can get without going way overboard with cost is 30/30.
Nobody in their right mind would use a high efficiency filter like a hospital grade filter.

Danny
__________________
1984 300SD Turbo Diesel 150,000 miles

OBK member #23

(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-14-2005, 09:40 AM
engatwork's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Soperton, Ga. USA
Posts: 13,667
Heck - they don't even run one on their own car.
Attached Thumbnails
K+N Filters are a bad idea for diesel engines.-no-filter-here.jpg  
__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-14-2005, 09:57 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dallas
Posts: 802
K&N

i run a cold air intake on my nissan se-r w/ a k&n. it's pretty much a full time track car so i'm always going for top performance. there is no staock airbox anymore so it runs a k&n all the time

I dyno'd my '01 clk55 with and without k&ns (it takes two) and i netted a 14 lb ft increase in torque at the wheels! That translate to about 400 lb ft at the crank when the base rating is 376 lb ft.... so there is real power to gain

I only put in the k&ns in the clk55 when i go to the drag strip (which i've only done once and for the dyno run) - i have oems in the car now

somewhere on mbworld.org i have the dyno charts posted
__________________
~shell
As of 2/2010:
2001 CLK55 0o\=*=/o0
13.6 @ 106mph
10K mi
1984 300SD
260K mi and going and going...
97 S600
46K miles
1991 Sentra SE-R (extremely dorked with)
www.se-r.net
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-14-2005, 04:36 PM
Hit Man X's Avatar
I LOVE BRUNETTES
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: FUNKYTOWN
Posts: 9,087
Thumbs up

Mean Green filters trap better than K&N... not to mention are built better. Too bad they're not made for us in direct replacement versions, only universal and select vehicles.
__________________
I'm not a doctor, but I'll have a look.

'85 300SD 245k
'87 300SDL 251k
'90 300SEL 326k

Six others from BMW, GM, and Ford.

Liberty will not descend to a people; a people must raise themselves to liberty.
[/IMG]
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-14-2005, 04:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by dunl
They're bad for any engine....they let it too much dirt.

If you use one, put a paper filter behind it and se how much dirt it catches that the K&N didn't.
How about marine engines? 98% of medium sided (800-2400 hp) marine diesels have a oiled gauze filter. Not much dust on the ocean....
So they do have a place that is within standard long term use applications- but it is not on a everyday driver if you want what is best for the engine and you plan on keeping the car according to nearly all well informed individuals.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Would it be a bad idea to seize my fan clutch The Bob Diesel Discussion 28 06-16-2003 12:44 AM
Is a Remote Starter a Bad Idea? Toby007 Tech Help 18 09-29-2002 05:40 AM
is It a bad idea to replace 2 tires only? AMGCKlass Mercedes-Benz Wheels & Tires 2 07-25-2000 10:31 AM
New paint job a bad idea? AMGCKlass Detailing and Interior 7 04-20-2000 04:34 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page