|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
190e won't start after Trans conversion
'90 2.6, used to be auto.
OK, after finally getting the manual tranny bolted up, we tried to see if the car would start. I took the electrical plug that used to connect to the auto tranny apart and wired the two neutral safety switch wires together. The starter cranks but the engine doesn't turn over. We don't see spark coming out of the coil (tested by holding a screwdriver near the electrical connector of the coil wire while trying to start the engine). Same thing when supplying the coil w/ direct power from the battery. The fuel pumps work and we can smell gas when manually opening the throttle body valve. Is something keeping us locked out of the coil? Could the coil go bad after about 3 weeks of the car sitting? Should I look elsewhere first? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
update....
....in case anyone's interested or has insight:
turns out I needed a spacer for the crank sensor (brand-new one was f'd up). Now the coil fires, but the engine still won't start. Mechanic buddy says it's as if there was too much timing retard. So, there's fuel (can smell it), there's air (no air cleaner and the throttle body valve moves), and there's spark, but still the engine doesn't run. Any ideas? |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I'm grasping at straws here, but...
Did you mess with the timing while making the tranny swap? You changed flywheels, right? Did you have to set the engine to top-dead-center? If so, are you sure you were on a power stroke, and not an exhaust stroke? This would make your timing 180-degrees off (ie: firing on the exhaust stroke) Just a thought. Jeff Pierce
__________________
Jeff Pierce Current Vehicles: '92 Mercedes 190E/2.3 (247K miles/my daily driver) '93 Volvo 940 Turbo Wagon (263K miles/a family truckster with spunk) '99 Kawasaki Concours Gravely 8120 Previous Vehicles: '85 Jeep CJ-7 w/ Fisher plow (226K miles)'93 Volvo 940 Turbo Wagon '53 Willys-Overland Pickup '85 Honda 750F Interceptor '93 Nissan Quest '89 Toyota Camry Wagon '89 Dodge Raider '81 Honda CB 750F Super Sport '88 Toyota Celica '95 Toyota Tacoma '74 Honda CB 550F |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Well, I don't think I did anything to mess with the timing; at least, I didn't do it on purpose :p. I didn't start the project at TDC, and each flywheel could only be installed one way, so I figured they should "look" the same to the crank sensor, sort of like a normal turn-off and re-start cycle.
Worth a look, but that would require pulling the tranny again.... . |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Clearly that's not it. As I said, I was grasping at straws.
Good luck... and post back with any updates. Jeff Pierce
__________________
Jeff Pierce Current Vehicles: '92 Mercedes 190E/2.3 (247K miles/my daily driver) '93 Volvo 940 Turbo Wagon (263K miles/a family truckster with spunk) '99 Kawasaki Concours Gravely 8120 Previous Vehicles: '85 Jeep CJ-7 w/ Fisher plow (226K miles)'93 Volvo 940 Turbo Wagon '53 Willys-Overland Pickup '85 Honda 750F Interceptor '93 Nissan Quest '89 Toyota Camry Wagon '89 Dodge Raider '81 Honda CB 750F Super Sport '88 Toyota Celica '95 Toyota Tacoma '74 Honda CB 550F |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
You will need to compare the two flywheels (and ring gears!) to verifty that the crank position sensor is correct. If they are different, you may need the computer out of a manny tranny model to get the timing correct.
Peter
__________________
1972 220D ?? miles 1988 300E 200,012 1987 300D Turbo killed 9/25/07, 275,000 miles 1985 Volvo 740 GLE Turobodiesel 218,000 1972 280 SE 4.5 165, 000 - It runs! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Peter, Is that correct? Didn't you just have a problem where the flywheel could be installed slightly "off"? Mike
__________________
1998 C230 330,000 miles (currently dead of second failed EIS, yours will fail too, turning you into the dealer's personal human cash machine) 1988 F150 144,000 miles (leaks all the colors of the rainbow) Previous stars: 1981 Brava 210,000 miles, 1978 128 150,000 miles, 1977 B200 Van 175,000 miles, 1972 Vega (great, if rusty, car), 1972 Celica, 1986.5 Supra |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
While the flywheel location would alter the timing, it wouldn't stop the creation of spark. That is unless the flywheel places the ring gear at a spot distant from the sensor.
__________________
Steve Brotherton Continental Imports Gainesville FL Bosch Master, ASE Master, L1 33 years MB technician |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Just to add my experience with 2 swaps... no trouble at all with flywheel position sensors. Both were installing a manual flywheel on an engine originally equipped with an automatic box. One was a 5 cyl diesel, other a 6 cyl. gasser. No computer problems, but both swaps used all donor parts from the same model year.
__________________
Hanno '79 6.9 Sold (after 27 years) '83 280SL, 5 spd. '94 E320 Sdn. 5 spd conversion '02 E320 Sdn.(on loan to mom!) '87 300E (5 spd. conversion) Sold '05 E500 Wagon |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On the M116/M117 aluminum engines, the flex plate bolts to the ring gear at three points, evenly spaced around the circumference. It will bolt up in any position, but is marked by small holes in both parts for alignment. If you get it 120 degrees off, the crank position sensor pin on the ring gear will be either fast or late by 120 degrees, causing severe running problems.
I don't know what the arrangement is on the M102/M103 engine, but you CAN get the flywheel on wrong, the offset in the bolt holes is small enough that the neck on the flywheel bolts will allow installation at any position if you screw them partly in and wriggle it around. If you finger tighten each one as it goes in, the offset bolt won't go in if the flywheel is in the wrong position. Steve: I believe he said he needed a spacer (or a different one) and now has spark but still a no-run condition. I assume this was to correct for the difference in thickness of the flywheels. If, however, the pin collided with the pickup before the spacer was installed, he may still have an erratic crank position indication. I believe a timing check with a strobe light is in order here. If it's way off, something needs fixing. Peter
__________________
1972 220D ?? miles 1988 300E 200,012 1987 300D Turbo killed 9/25/07, 275,000 miles 1985 Volvo 740 GLE Turobodiesel 218,000 1972 280 SE 4.5 165, 000 - It runs! |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Update:
Quote:
Quote:
Anyway, for a full story, check out this thread. The link is a post to the summary of what I've done, plus extra links that talk about the hiccups I encountered. |
Bookmarks |
|
|