Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-14-2004, 07:26 PM
Cigar Havana's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London Ontario Canada
Posts: 382
Do I Need a New Catalytic Converter?

For a 1989 420 SEL with 240,000 KM, my emission inspection shows :

At 40 KM/h (1384 rpm)
HC PPM 53
CO% .05
NO ppm 73
dilution 15.05

at curb idle (670 rpm)
HC ppm 43
CO% .00
dilution 12.00

I did have to fiddle with the mixture to get a pass. Do I need a new cat.? What would the readings be if I do need a new cat?

__________________
1989 420 SEL
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-14-2004, 10:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,276
Given the low CO, I doubt it. HC on Merc engines of this era is typically higher than average for similar vintage cars (especially M103s), but I don't know why. Your numbers appear to be pretty good (especially NOx) for an '89 vintage car, Merc or otherwise!

O2 content in the exhaust is the key to understanding the operational efficiency of the catalyst(s). Does your test report list O2 content?

Also, what kind of test? It appears that the car was checked under load on a dyno at 40 KPH, and then an idle test was done(?). Can you explain the test procedure in more detail.

Does your test report state the limits for passing and average passing numbers for the year group?

I'd be a happy camper if my car had numbers this low on the CA ASM test. I've been at the ragged edge (113 HC limit at 15 MPH) for my last three or four tests.

Duke
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-14-2004, 10:35 PM
Cigar Havana's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London Ontario Canada
Posts: 382
Test

No O2 listed in the test results. Yes, the 40kph test is on a dyno. The car has 241,000 KM.

Here are the limits for passing
40 km/h
HC ppm 58
CO % .32
NO ppm 0630

Curb idle
HC ppm 200
CO % 1
NO ppm not applicable
__________________
1989 420 SEL
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-14-2004, 10:44 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,160
Duke2.6

I can answer some of these questions for you.
Our test consists of:
1. Pre-conditioning cycle ( running on the rollers for 2 minutes, to dry wet tires, warm up cat, etc. ).
2. Run vehicle at constant speed of 40 km/hr. at a very light load ( about 25 hp ), for a maximum of 90 seconds. If the numbers are way below the standard, the computer may halt the test sooner.
3. Stabilize idle speed & measure idle emissions.

Last test on my vehicle for instance:
2500 rpm CO limit: 0.70 % actual: 0.00 %
HC limit: 150 ppm actual: 6 ppm
NO ppm: N/A

Idle CO limit: 0.70 % actual: 0.04 %
HC limit: 150 ppm actual 6 ppm.

The limits are periodically adjusted ( usually donwward ), to reflect a history of actual readings of the same year,make, model of vehicle.

__________________
2007 C 230 Sport.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-15-2004, 01:23 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,276
Thanks for the rundown on the test, manny. Your car is obviously very clean, but that's what I'd expect for a late model car.

The '89 420 SEL is very low on CO and NOx, but high on HC, which is somewhat typical of KE equipped models from that era though the V-8s seem to be cleaner than the inlines sixes. I'm not sure why, but I have a couple of theories - excess quench area, which causes high engine out HC emissions or high cylinder to cylinder A/F ratio scatter relative to a typical electric solenoid injector equipped engine. Either or both could cause relatively high engine out HC and, and there may be not enough 02 available to oxidize them down to a low level. CO probaby has a higher oxidation affinity than some of the HC species so the available O2 oxidizes almost all the CO, but leaves a good deal of HC.

In CA we have no preconditioning unless it's raining and they do the "tire dry" procedure. Four years ago I went on a rainy day and specifically asked them to run the tire dry test as I knew it would heat up the converter. HC was 20 percent lower that the previous ASM test. Two years ago I went on a dry day and it barely squeaked by.

I'm developing a strategy for my upcoming test in the next sixty days.

Our standards are based on year group, not make and model and most KE equipped Mercs have been identified as "high emitter profile". Many fail marginally or just squeak under the limit.

Your idle limits are pretty generous, especially considering that the test is run immediately after the conditioning and light load 40 kph test.

Duke

Last edited by Duke2.6; 12-15-2004 at 01:38 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-15-2004, 02:33 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 197
The V8's tend to have lower HC because they have air running around from behind the Kjet fuel injector which helps with the mixing of the fuel and incoming air while the 4cylinder and 6 cylinder engines didn't.

__________________
Alex.

MB Tech
Sydney, Australia
Volvo 122S
W201 190D 2.5 manual
W202 C240
W203 C32
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page