Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-20-2001, 06:12 PM
RunningTooHot's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Here
Posts: 898
Boiling down my purchase decisions…. There are SO many cars to choose from in the Southern California area, and I want to make an informed decision.

It’s likely going to be an early turbodiesel, but what year? – I'd like to know if there were any significant engine differences between the earliest turbo diesels (early 80s) and the ones built later, such as the 1983-1985 engines? (I'm not looking at anything newer than the 1985 cars.)

Are they pretty much the same, or were the later ones better built (beefier internals?) or have better ancillaries such as injection pumps, cooling capacities, turbos, etc., etc..

Secondly, are the turbos just as reliable as the normally aspirated cars – in other words, should I look at earlier cars (pre-turbo) assuming that they accelerate quickly enough to satisfy my needs?

Thanks again everyone for your help! MUCH appreciated!


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-20-2001, 08:22 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Suwanee, GA, USA
Posts: 4,712
The '85 turbo was by far the best built. The engine actually lasts longer with the turbo. Why?, I don't know. But, I have re-sleeved MANY of the non turbo engines.

The only way to kill a turbo engine is to run it out of oil.
__________________
Benzmac:
Donnie Drummonds
ASE CERTIFIED MASTER AUTO TECHNICIAN
MERCEDES SPECIALIST 11 YRS
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-20-2001, 08:42 PM
Johnson Chan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
get a turbo, its faster. A non turbo is dangerous (too slow entering traffic/highways and making left turns) and a nuissance to drive.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-20-2001, 08:46 PM
Johnson Chan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Oh I forgot about your second question.

I like the 91-93 300D 2.5 myself. I also own one so I practice what I preach. Of all of them, I like this one the most (except for the repair bills, yikes, its in the shop as i type).

They are not too complicated and can be worked on yourself, not too slow, priced reasonably, etc. Of course if those factors are not important to you, the 99 E300 turbo is the way to go, if you can find one for sale.

I like the S350 myself and was going to get one, and still might to add to my collection, but they have engine problems.

82-85 diesels have a good look, but they dont have a lot of features newer cars have, like my 84 300D turbo doesnt have automatic seats, air bags, anti lock brakes, etc. and its the slowest of the 3. Goodluck

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aftermarket turbo question - 1980 300D driad_98 Diesel Discussion 11 02-27-2004 08:32 PM
Turbo hookup / boost question BIGRED Diesel Discussion 1 04-02-2003 09:37 AM
300D Turbo question (valves) Roboman Tech Help 1 06-11-2002 06:49 AM
300D turbo dash symbol question? Fredmburgess Diesel Discussion 2 05-21-2002 10:17 PM
Turbo question kollas2 Tech Help 18 05-14-2002 06:19 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page