Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 04-29-2007, 11:33 AM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Gainesville FL
Posts: 6,844
I have never really paid any attention to fuel control at full throttle as I have never had a deficiency that related to the electronic control at WOT. I will say that I'm pretty sure what you are seeing is appropriate. The only action I could imagine different would be a lack of control (open loop) at WOT. Many systems will do this, not sure about KE. Open loop at WOT would put EHA current at 0.0ma with any base mixture setting.

If the system is still in closed loop it is natural for it to go negative WOT as the base system is designed to be richer at that set of circumstances, I would presume.

As to adjusting the EHA, all you are doing is changing the size of the fixed leak. It really shouldn't be done without monitoring the differential pressure. The main reason I say that is that if you really have a problem here it is probably due to a variation in differential pressure that isn't current related. In other words at different fuel flow rates the differential pressure would vary with the EHA unplugged. This is not how it is supposed to work but a number of conditions can cause it.

__________________
Steve Brotherton
Continental Imports
Gainesville FL
Bosch Master, ASE Master, L1
33 years MB technician
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-29-2007, 12:24 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 31
Thanks, Steve, for your answer. I understood most of it (I guess ;-)
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevebfl View Post
I have never really paid any attention to fuel control at full throttle as I have never had a deficiency that related to the electronic control at WOT. I will say that I'm pretty sure what you are seeing is appropriate....
I believe it works the way it should, too. Maybe the next few hundred miles will show if the mileage and driveability are OK. I may rely too much on measured (or missing) current values, when tha WIS says the full load enrichment should be about +3...+6 mA.

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevebfl View Post
If the system is still in closed loop it is natural for it to go negative WOT as the base system is designed to be richer at that set of circumstances, I would presume.

As to adjusting the EHA, all you are doing is changing the size of the fixed leak. It really shouldn't be done without monitoring the differential pressure. The main reason I say that is that if you really have a problem here it is probably due to a variation in differential pressure that isn't current related. In other words at different fuel flow rates the differential pressure would vary with the EHA unplugged. This is not how it is supposed to work but a number of conditions can cause it.
The next step would be a wideband AFR meter, but that costs something like 300 euros. I want to get the basic settings right before I'll add some forced induction to the motor.

tomant
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-29-2007, 12:34 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Gainesville FL
Posts: 6,844
One thing about your WIS data: any correction of such a nature is added to the current situtaion. I've not experienced WOT enrichment but I do know of accereration enrichment. It is based on the rate of change of the airflow pot. It can give 3-5ma of enrichment. That doesn't mean that while watching EHA current one would see a reading of 3-5ma. What it means is that if one were in closed loop at -2 to -3ma (a nice rich basic setting), and one floored it and got a 5ma enrichment the values one read would be +2 to +3 ma a CHANGE of 5ma.
__________________
Steve Brotherton
Continental Imports
Gainesville FL
Bosch Master, ASE Master, L1
33 years MB technician
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-29-2007, 12:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevebfl View Post
One thing about your WIS data: any correction of such a nature is added to the current situtaion. I've not experienced WOT enrichment but I do know of accereration enrichment. It is based on the rate of change of the airflow pot. It can give 3-5ma of enrichment. That doesn't mean that while watching EHA current one would see a reading of 3-5ma. What it means is that if one were in closed loop at -2 to -3ma (a nice rich basic setting), and one floored it and got a 5ma enrichment the values one read would be +2 to +3 ma a CHANGE of 5ma.
KE Jet should have full load enrichment but no acceleration enrichment when engine tempereture is above 80 degree C. You are right about the enrichment current being added to the cruise current. I just don't see any full load enrichment in the form of increasing current even though the full load switch seem so work OK. The current typically decreases to -10 mA. That still puzzles me.

tomant
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-29-2007, 01:54 PM
just-n-time's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Louisiana266 Maloy Rd winnfield71483
Posts: 804
What constitutes a closed loop system?What items are included in the loop,If you can Isolate each, can you find the input for bad or different reading? JNT
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-04-2007, 10:12 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 31
I bought a TechEdge wideband lambda meter. The AFR stays at 14.5 at idle and cruise. At WOT acceleration the AFR is around 11.5 - 13 and then gets back to 14.5 at constant speed. So the KE-Jetronic mixture formation seems to be working great.

What would be a good value for AFR for a NA engine and a turbo engine in closed loop operation? The wideband meter has a narrowband output to the ECU and I can program it to give almost any AFR in closed loop. I think I must change the basic CO and/or EHA mixture accordingly. Do the EHA basic setting (the adjustment screw inside the EHA) and the CO setting (idle mixture screw) affect the whole mixture scale from lean (or stoichiometric) to rich mixtures in the same manner or is there some principal difference between these settings?

tomant
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-30-2007, 06:46 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: England
Posts: 1,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomant View Post
KE Jet should have full load enrichment but no acceleration enrichment when engine tempereture is above 80 degree C.

tomant
Sorry I'm a bit late to this thread...

Are you saying KE Jet above 80 degrees has no acceleration enrichment? So with the EHA unplugged it should accelerate similarly to when plugged in (except for when you go to WOT)?
__________________
190E's:
2.5-16v 1990 90,000m Astral Silver
2.0E 8v 1986 107,000m Black 2nd owner
http://www.maylane.demon.co.uk/190esmall.jpghttp://www.maylane.demon.co.uk/190esmall2.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-30-2007, 10:15 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by pentoman View Post
Sorry I'm a bit late to this thread...

Are you saying KE Jet above 80 degrees has no acceleration enrichment? So with the EHA unplugged it should accelerate similarly to when plugged in (except for when you go to WOT)?
According to SAE paper nr 820253 "KE-Jetronic - A New Continuously etc." by Wolfgang Maisch that is the case. The acceleration enrichment ends at 80 deg C. The full load enrichment should be 10% between 1500 and 3000 rpm and 5% above 4000 rpm. This may be for early KE-Jet models, maybe later are different? My KE-Jet seems to keep the AFR value at 14,5 until WOT acceleration. After that the AFR varies from 11 to 13 at acceleration and unplugging the EHA doesn't seem to affect these WOT values.

tomant

Last edited by tomant; 07-30-2007 at 10:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-30-2007, 02:25 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: England
Posts: 1,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomant View Post
According to SAE paper nr 820253 "KE-Jetronic - A New Continuously etc." by Wolfgang Maisch that is the case. The acceleration enrichment ends at 80 deg C. The full load enrichment should be 10% between 1500 and 3000 rpm and 5% above 4000 rpm. This may be for early KE-Jet models, maybe later are different? My KE-Jet seems to keep the AFR value at 14,5 until WOT acceleration. After that the AFR varies from 11 to 13 at acceleration and unplugging the EHA doesn't seem to affect these WOT values.

tomant
Hmm, excellent research there. I haven't felt much of a difference with EHA unplugged it has to be said.
__________________
190E's:
2.5-16v 1990 90,000m Astral Silver
2.0E 8v 1986 107,000m Black 2nd owner
http://www.maylane.demon.co.uk/190esmall.jpghttp://www.maylane.demon.co.uk/190esmall2.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-03-2007, 12:13 PM
crhenkel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Decatur, Illinois, USA
Posts: 616
bump

__________________
Christopher Henkel
1990 190E 2.6 - Arctic white SOLD
1986 190E-16v - Blauswartze
1993 300CE - SOLD
2003 W208 CLK 320 Cabriolet - Magma Red
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page