![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Considering A Purchase Of A '92 190e ( 114k ) Seller States New Valve Cover Gasket, Head Job, Alt, Batt, A/c Charge +. At A Shop, Sort Of Seems To Be A Rebuild Or Possible Mechanic Lein Situation.
Probably Can Pick Up For 2800 - 3k, For Daughter To Use For School. In The Past I Had Heard The 190 Was Not So Good.. I Am A Ml & Clk Owner So Have Not Seen The Forum Thoughts On The 190e. Would Appreciate As Much Quick Feed Back As Possible, Need To Move Pretty Quick. Can It Run On 87, Or 89 octane fuel With No Issue. What Are Owners Experience With Mileage Adverages. Any Major Or Known Mechanical Issues ?? Under Consideration: 190e, Camary, Or Nissan (sentra, Altima); Prefer The Benz, But Want The Durability And no Head Aches. Thanks For Answers Last edited by acapulco36; 04-17-2007 at 10:15 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The 190E is a pretty durable car and a very safe one, too. I'm assuming its a 2.3 190E and not a 2.6? The 2.3 is pretty good with mileage and the engine is very easy to work on. The 2.6 offers better performance, but at a price of a little worse mileage. The 190E/190D is still used as taxi's in some parts of Europe to this day.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
camry or accord if this is for your daughter. far fewer potential headaches than an old 190e.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
10 years & 220,000 Miles - I sat behind a 190E 2.6
I've enjoyed the car
It has (never) rarely stranded me. With that said - some parts of the engine are near impossible to get to. Replacing the water pump requires a special socket wrench that bends around parts. My air conditioning is broke and the radio crackles. The body and chassis are in great shape. I just bought the 300E, but am considering keeping the 190E for my daughter. The Toyota may be an option, as posted earlier. I'm thinking the car is solid, and in the case of an accident, my daughter will walk away. Besides, it has a new water pump installed (by an indy). Final Answer: After 10 years and many miles, I am glad I had the car. BTW - the 300E has the same engine - just more work space. Just shows the 190E is a good choice - in essesnce I just bought another (only larger). ![]()
__________________
Thanks for the help Bill Fisher '86 560SL (186K) - Now a 'classic' : Registered as an Historic Vehicle 02 E430 in the stable '14 LS460 (Lexus) - - - - - '95 E420 (198K) found a new home '99 E320 (80K) (gave it's life for me as we hit a bumper) '95 E420 (231K) Sold to a happy buyer, new to Mercedes '90 300E (65K) Sold to an Mercedes Lover '92 190E (215K) - retired to the salvage yard '93 500SEL (214K) - Moved to another family, still runs like a young pup |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Nissan, Camry, Hyundai, are tin cans. Hit a tree in one at a good speed and they will split in half. I've seen it many times. Reliable tin cans, but tin cans nonetheless. Not even close. There is nothing else to say - the active and passive safety DEMANDS the 190e. The subordinate question is whether the particular one you are checking out is in good condition, has a reasonable price, and is not the victim of a prior wreck, and is rust-free, with a clean title.
__________________
![]() 1995 E 420, 170k "The Red Plum" (sold) 2015 BMW 535i xdrive awd Stage 1 DINAN, 6k, <----364 hp 1967 Mercury Cougar, 49k 2013 Jaguar XF, 20k <----340 hp Supercharged, All Wheel Drive ![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
We have a 1990 190E 2.6 with 510,000kms on the clock and the engine has never been opened and the trans is original too. Now, the top end is getitng soft and the suspension is all pretty much shot, and the total bil to bring her back far exceeds its value, so its days are numbered now. But, the AC still works, as does the cruise control! One of a kind, eh?
So, its been a very good car providing hundreds of thousands of good kms, but not without some headaches, that's for sure. However, having driven other products to high odo readings, I think the 190E is probably no more troublesome as the miles pile on. One problem is the lack of inexpensive jobber parts. Our old long-gone 88 Mazda 626 lasted many years on very inexpensive jobber parts, keeping the cost of long term service very low. The 190E uses mostly MB parts exclusively. Usually for the same money as on old 190E you can get a much newer Civic/Corolla that will cost less to operate.
__________________
John Shellenberg 1998 C230 "Black Betty" 240K http://img31.exs.cx/img31/4050/tophat6.gif |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
got my son a 300e. he's concerned about the fuel economy. I am concerned for his life.
he just has to drive less, i guess.. it's been a great car for about 2 1/2 years. i hope it gets him through his final 3 years of college. i woulnd't hesitate getting a 190e, but cramming that 2.6 in it could make for some interesting challenges around the radiator, fan, water pump. I hear its easier just to take off the entire front bumper when doing that work.
__________________
1989 300ce 129k ( facelifted front,updated tail lights, lowered suspension,bilstein sports, lorinser front spoiler, MOMO steering wheel, remus exhaust,stainless steel brake lines). (Gone) 1997 s320 154k (what a ride). Sold with 179k miles. Replaced with Hyundai Equus 1994 e320 Cabriolet 108k ![]() 1972 280se 4.5 153k Owned for 12 yrs, sorry I sold it [/SIGPIC] |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
![]() ![]() I would bet nearly anything I own that an impact severe enough to cleft a Camry in two would be severe enough to do the same to a 190e. Either way it's not a good scenario, ![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Yes and no.. with the accidents I had in my Golf, compared to my friends who have Hondas and such.. well, my Golf was much tougher. A little bump into a Honda and you just screwed up the whole wing/fender, while with mine I barely lost some paint. So this doesn't really relate to MB, but it's to give you an idea... MBs are much tougher than VWs, no? |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|