If it's the 210 in his avatar then the short answer is no. The long answer is that raising the rear ride height will give it less negative camber, lowering will give it more negative camber.

__________________

90 300TE 4-M
Turbo 103, T3/T04E 50 trim
T04B cover .60 AR
Stage 3 turbine .63 AR
A2W I/C, 40 LB/HR
MS2E, 60-2 Direct Coil Control
3" Exh, AEM W/B O2
Underdrive Alt. and P/S Pulleys,
Vented Rear Discs, .034 Booster.
3.07 diffs 1st Gear Start

90 300CE 104.980
Milled & ported head, 10.3:1 compression
197° intake cam w/20° advancer
Tuned CIS ECU
4° ignition advance
PCS TCM2000, built 722.6
600W networked suction fan
Sportline sway bars
V8 rear subframe, Quaife ATB 3.06 diff

Ride height is on the first things checked when alignments are done. Thats why OEM spec ride height is only used when doing alignments because all angels will be thrown off. If the ride height isnt at spec then it is should be corrected...

__________________
1986 300SDL, 211K,Dealership serviced its whole life
1991 190E 2.6(120k)
1983 300D(300k)
1977 300D(211k)

2000 430 i lowered the car so i was wondering if someone have some rear camber aftermarket brackets or any ideas to fix it thanks...