Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-25-2009, 12:58 PM
hsahai's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Gainesville Virginia
Posts: 37
Interference engine to Non-interference engine-Just a thought.

Interference engine to Non-interference engine-Just a thought.
This is just a theoretical preposition based on my experience with Isuzu Rodeo 3.2 K V6-SOHC. This engine is Non-interference engine. Few months back timing belt(not chain) broke. Nothing bad happen to piston or Valve.
My observation- Ignition champer is larger than the travel of pistons or valve?

My theoretical prepostion is -----

1- Meassure the elevation of the lobe of the cam shaft- travel distance of Valve into the Ignition chamber.
2- Increase the ignition chamber hight to same lenght as travel distance of valve- by putting head gasket spacer or may be putting 2,3,4 head gaskets.
3- Theoretically- If ignition chamber hight is increased by valve travel distance. Piston will not collide with valve.
4-Possible broblems- loss of some compression ratio, loss of some power
5-Abvantage- NO BENT VALVES, NO DAMAGE PISTON IF TIMING CHAIN BREAKS.

What are your thoughts on this hypothesis.--------?

If anybody has done this? It will be great inovation if any of you want to do this vanture?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-25-2009, 01:14 PM
waybomb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,557
You'll loose a ton of compression.

You could have custom pistons built ($$$) with thick crowns and relieve the tops for the valves, assuming there's room for the connecting rod when it's all done. But then you swinging heavy pistons around.

Wouldn't it be cheaper to simply change the chain when the job is prescribed?
__________________
Thank You!
Fred
2009 ML350
2004 SL600
2004 SL500
1996 SL600
2002 SLK32
2005 CLK320 cabrio
2003 ML350
1997 C280 Sport
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-25-2009, 03:00 PM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
Yeah, huge compression loss, and it probably would not work....timing chains rarely fail, and when they do, its because it was neglected. Just replace the chain!
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-25-2009, 03:18 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 385
I bet one of the head gasket layers or spacer fails before the chain too, an alternative would be to use a crank position sensor and cam position sensors to continuosly monitor chain stretch or maybe monitor the position of the chain tensioner to determine stretch.
I'm a lot happier with a dual chain setup than the modern belts that snap without warning.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-25-2009, 11:53 PM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
Same here, timing belts are the worst thing ever, I'll never buy a vehicle with a timing belt engine, which is why I have no VW tdi.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-26-2009, 12:10 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 557
you answered your own question...it's about compression and that's it. Lower compression engines can be non-interference engines but they won't develop the horsepower that interference engines are able to in a smaller (and hence more effecient) arena. So if you want the same performance from a non inter engine you would have to make the engine larger thus negating any performance gained. Both in weight/fuel economy and the associated handling loss of such added bulk. I haven't heard of any decent non-interference engine on a performance engine since the hemis of the late 60's or early 70's muscle cars (and you know where they are now)..And don't even get me going on diesels.....it's simply an enginering fact....hell, do they still even make a non interference engine that can be sold in the US...I would think that the EPA would have strangled by now......
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-26-2009, 12:45 AM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
Yeah there are extremely few non-interference engines to begin with, probably no recent ones either.

I can remember I was looking on craigslist at a 300E 4matic with 240k on it or something that had a failed timing chain, the woman wrote in the ad "timing chain just needs to be replaced then the car will be good as new" I e-mailed her and informed her that the damage was likely extensive and that the engine may well be toast. She rudely responded that the engine was of the non interference type and that her price (3800) was fair and that I should learn something about engines before I say what type it is. I told her that MB never even produced a non-interference engine, including the M103, and that she was dreaming on the price. It only went downhill from there....she was pretty darn sure that it was the non-interference type....ah well, some people are too dumb to be helped I guess.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-26-2009, 10:51 AM
OldPokey's Avatar
0-60 in 10 minutes flat
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Middletown MD
Posts: 527
Let's hear it for sleeve valve engines!
__________________
1984 300TD

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-26-2009, 11:01 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Posts: 1,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by pawoSD View Post
Same here, timing belts are the worst thing ever, I'll never buy a vehicle with a timing belt engine, which is why I have no VW tdi.
Yes, I got one recently somewhat against my better judgement (this issue). A more sensible around-town vehicle than the GL. The belt rubs and squeaks on cold startup--30K miles before scheduled change.

Guys on the TDI forum actually try to come up with reasons belts are better, but they aren't convincing. USA needs A- and B-class.
__________________
Kent Christensen
Albuquerque
'07 GL320CDI, '10 CL550. '01 Porsche Boxster
Two BMW motorcycles
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-26-2009, 10:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 557
yes, the old sleeve block. I had a Peugeot 504D with the sleeve block....interesting engines for sure....
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-27-2009, 12:25 AM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by lkchris View Post
Yes, I got one recently somewhat against my better judgement (this issue). A more sensible around-town vehicle than the GL. The belt rubs and squeaks on cold startup--30K miles before scheduled change.

Guys on the TDI forum actually try to come up with reasons belts are better, but they aren't convincing. USA needs A- and B-class.
That's scary! 30k before required change....so it only has like 40k on it?

The other scary part is the ridiculous amount of work and $$ involved in replacing that annoying belt every 70k....that is, if it doesn't break before it is replaced.

So far I have put nearly 80k on my two MB's (almost 74k on the diesel and just over 6k on the gasser)....with 0 issues. I did have the chain replaced on my diesel around 212k....as it was quite stretched.....that was nearly 70,000 miles ago, and it has only 1/2 a degree of stretch now. Its going to last a looooong time.

The timing belt was one of the main reasons I moved so quickly to get rid of the Rav4 in my sig....it was like 9k overdue for a timing belt....and I didn't want to pay $800 for that, so I sold it quick and got the 300E. M103 timing chains last for a loooong time with proper oil changes.

__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page