Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-01-2010, 04:14 PM
babymog's Avatar
Loose Cannon - No Balls
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northeast Indiana
Posts: 10,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by lkchris View Post
<>although of course premium gasoline is more expensive than diesel fuel.
Not in some areas.
__________________

Gone to the dark side

- Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-01-2010, 06:55 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 2,578
In terms of "the way it drives" a 210 leaves a 126 for dead. The 210 is a responsive, comfortable almost-a-sport-sedan. A 126 is big and ponderous in comparison.

Yeah, the rack and pinion steering has a different feel than the old recirculating ball boxes, but nonetheless it is very, very good. Steering on a 210 has good feel to tell you how hard the tires are working and is very accurate on center with almost no play.

Fuel economy on a 210 wagon should be about the same as a 126 diesel, maybe a little better on the highway.

I'm thinking the reliability of a 2000+ 210 isn't going to have much trouble matching the reliabilty of an '87 SDL.

One thing to be aware of with wagons is they have a bit more road noise than sedans. It's not bothersome, but is noticeable. Be sure to drive any candidate cars at highway speeds.

It's hard to argue with a 210 wagon; they are a great blend of competent driving, comfort, safety, utility, and even decent economy.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-02-2010, 01:06 AM
Skid Row Joe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcyuhn View Post
In terms of "the way it drives" a 210 leaves a 126 for dead. The 210 is a responsive, comfortable almost-a-sport-sedan. A 126 is big and ponderous in comparison.

Yeah, the rack and pinion steering has a different feel than the old recirculating ball boxes, but nonetheless it is very, very good. Steering on a 210 has good feel to tell you how hard the tires are working and is very accurate on center with almost no play.

Fuel economy on a 210 wagon should be about the same as a 126 diesel, maybe a little better on the highway.

I'm thinking the reliability of a 2000+ 210 isn't going to have much trouble matching the reliabilty of an '87 SDL.

One thing to be aware of with wagons is they have a bit more road noise than sedans. It's not bothersome, but is noticeable. Be sure to drive any candidate cars at highway speeds.

It's hard to argue with a 210 wagon; they are a great blend of competent driving, comfort, safety, utility, and even decent economy.
Precisely.

I have no idea where that above poster Ferdman came up with his beliefs on W210's handling. All eroneous from my 11 years and 120K miles driving and owning one.

The W210 (mine anyway) is a precise rocket sled of a car that does everything well. It's fast, quick, handles perfectly, stops on a dime, and feels like a tuned sports car is how it feels in your hands.

If an SDL feels anything like my mid '80s SD did - they're apples and zebras apart from the W210 in the performance and overall ride aspects of the two cars. I much prefer the W210's precision.
__________________
'06 E320 CDI
'17 Corvette Stingray Vert
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-02-2010, 07:10 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 3,077
Rack & pinion steering gives an entirely different feel than the recirculating ball steering, at least to me. I own a 1995 E320 and a 1998 E320 and the ride/handling is noticeably different. I was simply suggesting to Randall that he drive W210 wagons to determine if he is satisfied with their ride/handling because it will vary from a 300SDL. Not saying it's good or bad, just that it's different.
__________________
Fred Hoelzle
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-11-2010, 03:14 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 53
Thanks for the information, everyone. I've owned the W210 for about a month now and am posting back here for edification of previous repliers and future searches on similar topics.

The short of it: my 2003 E320 wagon is the closest thing to a perfect car I've ever driven, but I still love and miss the 300SDL.

The W210 feels smaller inside, and is more nimble. The throttle is amazingly fine-grained and responsive compared with an old diesel. The steering is very different: more confident around corners, but seeming to require a little more touch maintaining a straight line. It's very solid; it feels better at 110 than the SDL did at 80.

One thing I've always loved about the SDL (and the '84 300TD before it) was that it felt like it was working. Something happens when you put the throttle down, but it's not effortless or automatic. These 80s models still feel very mechanical and analog, and for me this makes them approachable and gives them more character.

The E320 drives so perfectly it's almost arrogant, but it still feels like a Mercedes. I was worried that something so new would drive like my mom's Camry (that is, like a go-cart), completely disconnecting me from the road. Not at all. Through the steering wheel and my butt in the seat I feel exactly what's going on at all times.

But it doesn't pretend to be a sports sedan, either. The transmission shifts into high gear more slowly than the SDL, which surprised me quite a bit, but the shifts are usually so perfect that I don't notice. The 5-speed helps.

Of the SDL I miss the long hood, the big steering wheel, the lower and more reclined driving position. I miss the sound and the smell and the simpler controls. I miss the size, and the trunk space.

I wouldn't consider going back, though. The SDL has one 24-year-old airbag while the E320 has 8. The E320 has heated seats and all-wheel drive. Hot damn, what a car.
__________________
2003 E320 wagon, ~80k, "Sputnik"
1987 300 SDL, ~160k, "The Pimp Daddy" (sold April 2010)
1984 300 TD, ~200k, "Das Boot" (Demised March 2008)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-11-2010, 11:48 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 2,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randall Hansen View Post

I wouldn't consider going back, though. The SDL has one 24-year-old airbag while the E320 has 8. The E320 has heated seats and all-wheel drive. Hot damn, what a car.
Actually, it has 10. There is a pair of side impact bags for the 3rd row seat mounted in the ceiling back there.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-12-2010, 12:14 AM
Skid Row Joe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,355
The more I see the W210 wagons - the better I like them. They are attractive cars - especially the newer model ones.
__________________
'06 E320 CDI
'17 Corvette Stingray Vert
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-13-2010, 11:27 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcyuhn View Post
Actually, it has 10. There is a pair of side impact bags for the 3rd row seat mounted in the ceiling back there.
Ha! That's awesome. This car just got a little more ridiculous
__________________
2003 E320 wagon, ~80k, "Sputnik"
1987 300 SDL, ~160k, "The Pimp Daddy" (sold April 2010)
1984 300 TD, ~200k, "Das Boot" (Demised March 2008)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page