![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the response!
The one came on the car failed in 91 (6yrs) & was replaced. Than between 1991-2007...replaced three more times. Now the one that was replaced in 2007 failed yesterday (~3yrs/30342km). So a total four + the one came on the car..."FIVE". During all those years, tensioners, absorbers, belts, etc. been replaced by the dealer, so I would think it's properly adjusted (sure hope so). Please keep ideas coming, I sure want to find out the root cause. bc this part is dealer part only (no oem/aftermarket available) & it's $996. ![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
http://www.trademotion.com/partlocator/index.cfm?action=searchCatalogOEM&siteid=214269 Item Number MSRP Core Price Price 1020300074 $875.00 $0.00 $787.50 Engine - Crankshaft & bearings - Vibration damper Vibration damper, 190e 2.3 - 4 cyl, 2.3l, w/0 16 valves 1985 - 1993 http://genuinemercedesparts.rtrk.com/?scid=1191126&kw=704098&pub_cr_id=3381536415 Item Number MSRP Core Price Price 1020300074 $875.00 $0.00 $700.00 Engine - Crankshaft & bearings - Vibration damper Vibration damper, 190e 2.3 - 4 cyl, 2.3l, w/0 16 valves 1985 - 1993 http://www.mercedespartscenter.com/partlocator/index.cfm?action=searchCatalogOEM&siteid=215720 Item Number MSRP Core Price Price 1020300074 $875.00 $0.00 $673.75 Engine - Crankshaft & bearings - Vibration damper Vibration damper, 190e 2.3 - 4 cyl, 2.3l, w/0 16 valves 1985 - 1993
__________________
![]() 1993 190E 2.3 2001 SLK230 1971 LS5 (454) Corvette Convertible |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
OUCH is RIGHT & that's 4 times already.
![]() WOW, thank you! bc I get 15% off $996 ($846,60) & it's shipped from Germany (not old stock). The reason I mentioned "old stock vs new stock"...the 3 times they replaced it with the part they had in stock, it lasted 3-4 years. But the one time they shipped it from Germany & only charged me for the part at their cost & gave me free labour...this part lasted 9 years. BUT the price is really attractive for me to take a gamble, hmmm...am I a gambling man. ![]() Last edited by whunter; 07-25-2011 at 02:48 PM. Reason: removed dead link |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It is expensive, bc this part is model/year/engine specific & car is 25yrs old. Just be glad I can still get it. ![]() Pic I shown above is not quite right of my setup. This new pic I got faxed over to me from the dealer shows my setup. Vibration absorber (#26) drives the pulley (#53) via the flange pulley damper (#35). If #35 breaks apart, the vibration absorber is free wheeling & the pulley (#53)/belt does NOT turn at all...all dash lights come on, no power steering & overheats if I keep driving (wp is not running). my setup has #35 flange pulley damper (P/N 1020300074) & #26 vibration absorber (P/N 1020301203). It is #35 that breaks apart. I just had a chat with someone, he said if that "rubber flange pulley damper" breaks apart every few years. Why not just bolt the pulley #53 directly to vibration absorber #26 with "metal spacer" in between & do away with #35 completely. This is what American cars do he saids. What do you guys think??? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It appears you have a superceded version which drives the belt pulley from the rubber balancer. That would help explain the rubber failure. This is similar in concept to the 112/113 engines where the pulley is bonded to rubber which is bonded to a flange which is connected to the crankshaft. Since the earlier versions failed with regularity it is considered a "wear or service item" by MB. Your problem is that the cost of the harmonic balancer is astronomical whereas the list price on the 112/113 balancer (part superceded due to problems 6 times by my count) is currently $84. My guess is in 15 years we will be paying $900 for the 112/113 balancer. Yikes! Mark
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
My euro indi mechanic sourced me this vibration damper, with NO rubber balancer & ALL metal. Will be installing it next week, should solve my problem.
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|