Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 12-12-2011, 02:32 PM
d.delano's Avatar
Dönerkebap
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 1,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by compress ignite View Post
If it doesn't come sealed ,in a container,with the Mercedes Imprimatur It's
JUNK!
O.E.M. can be ANY form of PRC (Communist Chinese Slave Labor Trash)
I'd have to disagree with you on that. It doesn't have to have the three pointed star on it to be good. It must be researched to reveal that the part is Made In Germany however, or Austria or somewhere in Eastern Europe where all of the OE suppliers have factories. So yeah, it does take a bit of homework to ensure you get good part, but you don't necessarily have to get it at the dealer and it doesn't necessarily have to have the tiny MB logo on it. There is some money to be saved that way. Of course the path of least resistance is to just go ahead and pay the (sometimes HUGE) premium and buy the part at the dealer. And yet sometimes, you have no other choice.

Uro parts are junk. That I can agree on.

__________________
'02 BMW 325i
'85 300D 450k
'93 190E 2.6 170k(killed by tree)
'08 Ducati Hypermotard 1100S 6k
'06 Ducati S2R800 14k(sold)
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-13-2011, 06:27 PM
126 Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 523
if you want to save some $$, measure the rotors using a micrometer and compare them to spec. If they are still within spec then machine then and just buy a good set of pads. Use original MB pads to ensure you will have no problems unless you want to upgrade to a performance pad or a pad with less brake dust. MB pads emit alot of brake dust
__________________
2001 E55

2001 E320 Sedan

2001 Subaru Legacy

2006 SLK280

2016 Subaru Outback 3.6
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-18-2013, 10:55 PM
stevenstevensteven's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NE Florida
Posts: 200
I purchased a set of four rotors last year for my '89 260e, but the rear rotors didn't include a hole for the rear hub's alignment pin (almost directly opposite the retainer hex screw). The parts supplier suggested that I simply cut-off the hub's alignment pin. But I was never quite comfortable doing so and only replace my rear brake pads. The pads need replacing again so my questions are as follows:

1) Is it okay to grind-off the alignment pin on the hub, or should I purchase a new set of rotors with the correct hole pattern?

2) If the consensus is to purchase a new set of rear rotors, then what brand model is recommended (as many of the rear rotor pics seem to show hole patterns that don't include a hole for the alignment pin).

Thanks in advance for your help.
__________________
Steven
1989 260E (276K miles)
1995 E320 (50K miles)
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-19-2013, 04:14 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 3,077
Steven, recommend buying new rotors from your local MB dealer. Grinding off the alignment pin would not be a good idea, at least I would never consider it.
__________________
Fred Hoelzle
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-19-2013, 04:58 AM
Can't Know's Avatar
Registered Slacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sunny CA
Posts: 733
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevenstevensteven View Post
I purchased a set of four rotors last year for my '89 260e, but the rear rotors didn't include a hole for the rear hub's alignment pin (almost directly opposite the retainer hex screw). The parts supplier suggested that I simply cut-off the hub's alignment pin. But I was never quite comfortable doing so and only replace my rear brake pads. The pads need replacing again so my questions are as follows:

1) Is it okay to grind-off the alignment pin on the hub, or should I purchase a new set of rotors with the correct hole pattern?

2) If the consensus is to purchase a new set of rear rotors, then what brand model is recommended (as many of the rear rotor pics seem to show hole patterns that don't include a hole for the alignment pin).

Thanks in advance for your help.
Hi, Steven.

Considering that (1) the purpose for the alignment pin is likely to aid in speeding up factory assembly (after all, once the lug bolts are in, it's not going anywhere) and (2) that the pin was dropped later in the 124 model run, I think you are perfectly safe to remove it. I believe it's simply pressed in, but at that age it may prove rather difficult to remove. If you try to grind it, you must be very precise, since it overlaps the mating surface and you certainly don't want to damage the hub...nor do you want to leave even a hint of raised bump behind (or the rotor will not seat properly).

Personally, I'd try to remove it before ordering new rotors, and if that fails, then you have to decide whether you have the time, tools and talent to properly grind it off. If not, get OE rotors.

Of course, if you are a purist, leave the pin in place...but if you were a purist, you wouldn't be asking that question.

As to which rotors to buy, I would use the EPC to look up specific part numbers for your car by VIN. Then search for that part number on line, and it should have the pin hole. I suspect part of the issue you are running into is that places are stocking "one number" for convenience which fits later models, but omits the pin hole for older chassis (likely a lesser manufacturer doesn't know the older models have the pin and it's cheaper to make the rotor if you drill one less hole).

And if you're shopping on flea-bay, well, don't expect much.

Good luck.

Last edited by Can't Know; 07-19-2013 at 05:19 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-19-2013, 05:52 AM
oldsinner111's Avatar
lied to for years
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Elizabethton, TN
Posts: 6,298
you can buy cheap rotors and have them chilled in liquid nitrogen to stabilize the metal. I did.I bought cheap U.S. made rotors
__________________
1999 w140, quit voting to old, and to old to fight, a god damned veteran, deutschland deutschland uber alles uber alles in der welt
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-19-2013, 07:48 AM
tyl604's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,754
For years I have bought parts from Baker Automotive on Piedmont Road in Buckhead. They are pretty good guys. In fact when Pep Boys finally decided their reman brake caliper would not fit my 81 300SD, they went down the street and got one from Baker. Baker is just north of Cheshire Bridge on Piedmont on the right if you are going north. They are in the phone book.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-19-2013, 11:37 AM
stevenstevensteven's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NE Florida
Posts: 200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Can't Know View Post
Hi, Steven.

Considering that (1) the purpose for the alignment pin is likely to aid in speeding up factory assembly (after all, once the lug bolts are in, it's not going anywhere) and (2) that the pin was dropped later in the 124 model run, I think you are perfectly safe to remove it. I believe it's simply pressed in, but at that age it may prove rather difficult to remove. If you try to grind it, you must be very precise, since it overlaps the mating surface and you certainly don't want to damage the hub...nor do you want to leave even a hint of raised bump behind (or the rotor will not seat properly).

Personally, I'd try to remove it before ordering new rotors, and if that fails, then you have to decide whether you have the time, tools and talent to properly grind it off. If not, get OE rotors.

Of course, if you are a purist, leave the pin in place...but if you were a purist, you wouldn't be asking that question.

As to which rotors to buy, I would use the EPC to look up specific part numbers for your car by VIN. Then search for that part number on line, and it should have the pin hole. I suspect part of the issue you are running into is that places are stocking "one number" for convenience which fits later models, but omits the pin hole for older chassis (likely a lesser manufacturer doesn't know the older models have the pin and it's cheaper to make the rotor if you drill one less hole).

And if you're shopping on flea-bay, well, don't expect much.

Good luck.
I didn't realize that :

(1) the pin was dropped in later 124 model runs, and
(2) the pin is pressed in.

Thanks for both pieces of info. I'll see whether I can remove the pin as my next step. Any tool/technique suggestions from the forum before I give it a go?

PS. Yeah, I don't shop at flea-bay. So far, my only source for parts online has been Lee, because I like to support the guys behind this forum, which has benefited me time and time again for more than 10yrs.
__________________
Steven
1989 260E (276K miles)
1995 E320 (50K miles)
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-19-2013, 12:13 PM
Can't Know's Avatar
Registered Slacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sunny CA
Posts: 733
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevenstevensteven View Post
I didn't realize that :

(1) the pin was dropped in later 124 model runs, and
(2) the pin is pressed in.

Thanks for both pieces of info. I'll see whether I can remove the pin as my next step. Any tool/technique suggestions from the forum before I give it a go?

PS. Yeah, I don't shop at flea-bay. So far, my only source for parts online has been Lee, because I like to support the guys behind this forum, which has benefited me time and time again for more than 10yrs.
The ebay reference was really tongue-in-cheek, particularly for others who might come across the thread later. I shake my head in wonder at some of the posts about ebay parts.

I tossed you some other suggestions about removing the pin in a reply to your PM. I wish you well with it.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-27-2013, 10:20 AM
jc300e's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Location: Norcross, GA
Posts: 126
For both my ML and 400E, Zimmerman rotors have proven to be the most stable. I am pretty sure that the Zimmerman coated rotors ARE the MB OE rotors without the star... save yourself a few bucks and don't compromise on longevity and feel. There are a number of companies that make brake components and I think I've tried them all. For me, the Zimmerman brand has been a solid choice... Pads.. I am a Akebono convert. I was a solid OE only persona before but now I am sold on the Akebono Euro Ceramic user. Very good brake feel, reduced dust, smooth and even rotor wear. I would dare say that I am getting a little more life out of my pads and rotors compared to previous combinations.
__________________
Jeff
'87 300E
'92 400E
'06 ML350
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-27-2013, 12:03 PM
stevenstevensteven's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NE Florida
Posts: 200
Quote:
Originally Posted by jc300e View Post
For both my ML and 400E, Zimmerman rotors have proven to be the most stable. I am pretty sure that the Zimmerman coated rotors ARE the MB OE rotors without the star... save yourself a few bucks and don't compromise on longevity and feel. There are a number of companies that make brake components and I think I've tried them all. For me, the Zimmerman brand has been a solid choice... Pads.. I am a Akebono convert. I was a solid OE only persona before but now I am sold on the Akebono Euro Ceramic user. Very good brake feel, reduced dust, smooth and even rotor wear. I would dare say that I am getting a little more life out of my pads and rotors compared to previous combinations.
Out of curiousity I just visited the Akebono web site and could not find a part number for REAR pads, as they only listed fronts for my '89 260e

Akebono Online Parts Catalog

Do they not make rears for my model? Or, can someone post the correct p/n. Thanks.

__________________
Steven
1989 260E (276K miles)
1995 E320 (50K miles)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page