![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
pressure testing crankcase
Recently, I took my 2002 e320 into the dealer for some radio work. When I picked up the car they told me that I had a small rear seal leak. I have not had any problem with oil usage. I do have a question about the advisability of their technique of pressure testing the crankcase. It would seam this would be hard on the seals as I do not believe that the crankcase is under pressure under normal operations. Does anyone have any experience with this testing technique?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Ofcourse it's hard on the seals! It is after all supposed to point out weak links, if the seals are otherwise ok than there is no harm.
__________________
600SEL '91 ![]() 300E 4Matic '88 240D '83 ![]() 280SE '77 ![]() 350SE '73 ![]() The most complex systems can fail in the simplest way. Contra verbosus noli contendere verbis, sermo datur cunctis, animi sapientia paucis. i don't believe in the lord! He's never bought me a Mercedes Benz. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Depending on how much blow by you have and the efficacy of your crankcase ventilation system, the crankcase can be under considerable pressure. I used to have an old Mercury that had so much blow by that it would actually push oil out the dipstick tube.
I do question the wisdom of pressure testing, since this could lead to failure of a marginal seal that could have continued adequately for months or years of continued service. If it isn't leaking under the use the operator puts it to, then it isn't broke, and doesn't need fixing.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar. 83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 401,xxx miles 08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 26,xxx miles 88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress. 99 Mazda Miata 183,xxx miles. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|