Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog Tech Info Tech Forums
  Search our site:    
 Cart  | Project List | Order Status | Help    

Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes ShopForum > Technical Information and Support > Tech Help

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-09-2003, 11:07 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: La Quinta, CA
Posts: 271
Cool JD Powers/MB durability report

Lexus Holds Top Spot in Durability Study

Lexus maintained its top spot for the ninth year in dependability rankings, according to an annual study by market researcher J.D. Power and Associates.

Lexus, the luxury division of Toyota Motor Corp., was followed by Nissan Motor Co.'s Infiniti brand, General Motors Corp.'s Buick nameplate, Porsche AG and Honda Motor Co.'s Acura label.

GM was the only one of Detroit's Big Three automakers to score better than the industry average of 273 problems per 100 vehicles.

"The Lexus brand has become one of the bulletproof brands out there," said Mike Wall, an industry analyst with CSM Worldwide. "In terms of quality, efficiency and overall manufacturing, I think Toyota's been head and shoulders above the rest."

The closely watched study is based on responses from more than 55,000 original owners of 2000 model-year cars and light trucks. For the first time, J.D. Power reviewed models at three years of ownership instead of four to five years to better support manufacturers' efforts to improve next-generation replacement models.

Because of the change, 2003 results are not directly comparable to previous studies.

Some of the most common problems in the new survey were excessive brake wear, wind noise and the replacement of components not called for under the normal maintenance schedule.

"Conventional wisdom said that dependability was the property of the Japanese and Europeans," said Joe Ivers, executive director of quality/customer satisfaction at J.D. Power. "While it's still true for automakers like Toyota and Honda, it's no longer the case for many Europeans."

Ivers noted that while Porsche, Jaguar, Saab and BMW scored above the industry average for dependability, Audi, Mercedes-Benz and Volvo were well below the standard.

J.D. Power said Mercedes-Benz had the largest gap between initial quality and long-term quality measurements.

In fact, DaimlerChrysler AG's Chrysler, Dodge and now-defunct Plymouth brands all scored higher than Mercedes-Benz in the 2003 study. Wall said Mercedes-Benz's score was partly attributable to problems with its M-Class sport utility vehicle.
Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2003, 01:18 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 12
to all those who crucified that guy recently

be sure to read these posts below carefully. I certainly did.
Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2003, 07:21 AM
Posts: n/a

Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2003, 08:33 AM
yal's Avatar
yal yal is offline
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: New York, Long Island
Posts: 2,704
Mercedes Benz E-Class

Discussion already in progress.
Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2003, 08:55 AM
spinedoc's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: North Grafton, MA USA
Posts: 700
Gotta laugh at this as someone who previously got crucified for "daring" to compare a Lexus to a MB.
2007 Corvette Convertible Torch Red
1996 MBz SL500
2008 Harley Davidson Night Rod Special
Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2003, 12:18 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 12
This poor quality thing is NO laughing matter- he was crucified for
saying I believe that all the models after 126 were crap, or something to that effect. Now everyone is posting threads about J.D. Powers this and that etc. Larry Bible: You have your answer now I believe. For people like me who buy USED cars because new cars are over priced(that's why they depreciate so rapidly) what are we to do now? I can't afford to buy a car that requires $4000 parts replaced! And I agree this shouldn't be on this forum. I guess people are just upset- can you blame them?
Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2003, 12:45 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 320
Durability and Tech Help are related topics. Discussions like this help us to see what is going on in the industry and what are MB design issues.

Replacing a badly designed head gasket with another one of the same design will result in a failure again after some time but replacing it with a redesigned one may solve the problem for a long time.

This is taking the forum one step further.
94 E320 58000 Miles
Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2003, 01:22 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 12
You are 100% correct

Can we dare hope Mercedes Benz of North America also comes to this forum? Imagine if this inspired them to to redue a component that they KNEW was faulty. At their replacement prices, should we expect anything less?
Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2003, 08:06 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 324
I fail to see what difference it makes which post is where. I come hear to read and learn not to critical. Lighten up a bit

03 C240 4matic wagon
95 300E 234,000
7 prior 240;s 5 still going
81 300sd gone
65 230sl gone
49 Studebaker Champion
90BMW convert.167,000
60 Dodge D-100
Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2003, 08:16 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,160
I love my Mercedes & I don't give a rat's ass what J.D. whatever the hell his name is, has to say about it !!!!!! :p
2007 C 230 Sport.
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2011 Pelican Parts - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page