|
|
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I've never had any problems moving the 126 through the snow. First week of Jan 2000, we drove the 560 from Texas to WI (1200 mile trip). Hit a horrible ice/sleet/snow storm that tortured us from Houston to southern MO. I was running the ole' 126 on Bridgestones that were ready to give up the ghost. Tough driving, but we made to central MO unscathed. Funny thing is that that we saw about 100 vehicles in the ditches and I'd say most were SUVs. The 126 felt very competent, even with dead skins. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
As far as "quiet" inside goes....I doubt there is anyone, anywhere who could produce one with an eerie silence that the 500 & 600 140's have! It's a result of two and a half tons of steel, glass, plastic, rubber and whatever else they used, combined with double-pane windows and vacuum seals on the doors. The car, as has been well-referensed (sp) in this respect, is over-engineered...but is in this case better off for it. For those who have not ever experienced this quietness....it is awesome. You have no idea what music sounds like inside of a vehicle traveling down a road at 75mph!
__________________
1996 SL320 97K miles 1996 C220 130k miles 1992 500SEL 170k miles <---sold 1986 300E 216k miles <---sold |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Warren 1992 300SD 175K Columbus Ohio |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
A very well stated point something like saying a base model 1980 240D is much easier to work on that a 1987 300SDL...so why doesn't everyone go for the 240 since its cheaper to work on? Warren 1992 300SD 175K Columbus Ohio |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
With the exception of a decent audio system (which can be added to any old car) I'm not much for gizmos. When I buy some old iron, I look for crank windows, manual seats, no cruise, and at times power brakes since modifying the crank can wreak havoc in that area. But back to to the Benz -- W126 is perfect for me. Not too many gizmos, a wonderful chassis, built like a tank, but not excessive. Good for a guy my size... Don't get me wrong though, I've had my eye on a few 140s, but the wife won't have part with old blue. If so inclined, I would sell my 126 and buy an 500E. Throw some Blizzaks on that pup and we'd be ready to roll for the WI winters. |
#51
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Gilly
__________________
Click here to see the items I have up for auction at EBay Click here to see a photo album of my '62 Sprite Project Moneypit (Now Sold) |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
I think they have got the 140 beat QUOTE]With the exception of a decent audio system (which can be added to any old car) I'm not much for gizmos.[/QUOTE] I agree but I really like the stereo in the 140 and to me there is something about having the factory stereo etc in the car that keeps the continuity of interior For me personally the 1985 126 with that 617(?) was a very tough one for me driveability wise...but it seems that many guys on here love that iteration...so I think of the old saying "different strokes for different folks" Warren 1992 300SD 175K Columbus Ohio |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
"Dinosaur"?
Certainly not a Tyrannosaurus!
Maybe a Brontosaurus! Seriously, if you are buying a car as an investment, you should, for the most part, consider another avenue, IMHO. Remember the spike in Ferrari prices? They dropped much faster than they ever rose. Kinda' like the price of gas: it can go up in an hour or two (NEWSFLASH: "The cost of oil is going up!") but it takes weeks to go back down... If you are purchasing a car to USE, to drive, enjoy, maintain.. Yes, even to BABY & to CHERISH, then such mundane concepts as ease of repair, original cost, actual purchase cost, cost of parts, AVAILABILITY of parts, etc. should come into the equation. I should also have added "available room to store spare parts, parts car, etc." Much easier here on the Left Coast than in NYC, or London, eh? For my money the 116/126 models provide significantly more of the above mentioned positive attributes than the 140's. The fact that a lot were produced may prove to be of benefit vis-a-vis the 140's in the future, but right now you can buy quite a few decent, running 126 cars for what a single bargain-priced 140 will cost. And you can actually work on them, which to me is half the fun!
__________________
'91 420 SEL @ 199K, '92 SVX @ 181K, '93 SC400 @ 86K, '93 Kaw ZX-11 @ 30K, '87 F250 @ 181K , 2001 Valkyrie Interstate @ 6K, Y2K Honda NightHawk 250 with 1.5K, '88 420SEL I.@ 179K & the 2nd latest, an '88 420SEL II.@ 210K runnin' parts car, '85 F150 300/NP435 |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
W140 300SD 1993
Just finished reading all of this after a break. All I can say is that I love my 93 SD , other than a bad radio power amp I've been very happy with this ride. Having owned a MB repair shop in Denver I can say that the W 126 is also a great ride However the W140 is a great fit in my life at this time. TAG
|
#55
|
||||
|
||||
plink49:
I went back and read your first reply, asking people to help you rationalize owning 3 MBs. I don't know if there is anything rational about the idea. But if you want to, and can afford it, then why not? I can see the depth of emotion people on this thread have for their cars, be they W140 or W126, or whatever. I have a humble W202 and I can't rationalize owning it. I don't drive to work. Hell, I even walk to the train station that takes me to work. I can't rationalize owning *any* car, let alone taking on the operating expenses involved with an MB. And while I realize that the W202 doesn't compare in cost or complexity to the W140, it is still a tough sell with my wife, who sees her Honda and how little it requires in terms of maintenance by comparison. But I love that car, warts and all. My wife tells me I love it more than her, and of course I tell her she's wrong, but... There is nothing rational about type of passion that people on this forum have for their cars. I, for one, am overjoyed to be irrational. If I could swing it, I'd have three of them myself. Even if I didn't need any of them. Jonathan |
#56
|
||||
|
||||
The V12 W140. It's over-kill to some, but my god it's beautiful. Every time I open the garage door I fall in love with my V12 all over again. The body lines are classic. I recently parked it in front of my building at work in a high foot-traffic area. Behind it was parked a very nice late 90's Corvette. I was able to watch the pedestrians passing by, and 9 out of 10 people were admiring my Benz, not the Corvette.
p.s. Only 618 came to the States in 1995. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
If any of you have driven or been driven in the S-Class when they were new,... I'll just say this.
Be it W140, W126, or W220. An S is an S, drives like an S, moves like an S, gets the fuel economy of an S. The only things that change are small improvements in technology, and a different face. From the W116 on up, all S's are similar in one way or another, from factory new. If the W140 was something that MB lost money on so quickly, why did they keep it for 8 years in the US? Anybody who knocks a car they have not driven brand new, doesn't know what the heck they're talking about. Its virtually an unfair controversy with no end. This thread will turn into something like the open discussion's religions thread or the gay marriage thread which is constantly growing and expanding as I post. An M116/M117 V8 in a W126 idles as smoothly as an electric car if it is in excellent shape. you'd have to look at the tach to tell if it was running. Same with the S-Class M103(yes, it is TRUE!). Personally, I just enjoy the massive thunk you get from slamming the doors of the W116, R107, and W126. To me, that says "Benz!". You don't get that from the W140. In fact, the roof actually bounces when you slam the doors.
__________________
1987 300SDL (324000) 1986 Porsche 951 (944 Turbo) (166000) 1978 Porsche 924 (99000) 1996 Nissan Pathfinder R50 (201000) |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
As someone pointed out earlier only reason they lost money ont eh 140 was that it cost 2 billion to develop. That's part of the reason they kept it around for so long, trying to get an ROI. Great cars though.
Now, about gay mairrage...... |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
I previously had a W126 and I would swear that the doors weighed 15-20lbs more than the doos on my W210, possibly adding to the "thunk." Don't know if that's true but it sure felt like it.
Another thing I loved about my 126 was feeling a short sensation of air compression in my ears when I closed the doors. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|