View Single Post
  #166  
Old 05-13-2008, 10:18 AM
RichC's Avatar
RichC RichC is offline
Internal Error 404
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 963
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler View Post
If you agree that SS is in jepardy, don't you think its use as a continual campaign issue is hypocritical? Why have the dems not solved it permanently by now? They have had the opportunity, and the ability, but lack the will. The obvious answer is that they want to retain it as a campaign issue. That is evil.

As for gay marriage. My opposition lies in the word "marriage". I have no problem with civil unions, or almost any other term. I fully support their civil rights.
Marriage has always (thruought recorded history anyway) meant a man and a woman. You are the proponent that we should not change definitions simply to suit ourselves. Why not be consistent, and acknowledge that the word "marriage" is inappropriate for gay couples? Or is there another, hidden agenda?
Is issue I was talking about is the idea that gay marriage will destroy American families.

Not if we should call gay marriages, civil unions or anything else.

The republicans have not fixed SS either.
So your argument can be turned around toward republicans also.

you can dance around the issues but they are still there.

And you can polish a turd all you want but it will still stink.


RichC

.
__________________

When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace.
Jimi Hendrix
Reply With Quote