Quote:
Originally Posted by bustedbenz
I'd go with the 98-99 e300, myself. Older, slightly less electronic, better looking in my personal opinion, and a more tried-and-true engine design with less complications. Also, older = more forum experience, more indy mechanic experience, and more aftermarket parts solutions, leading to more accessible repairs and less expensive parts. Win all the way around as long as you don't get one with the spring perch issue.
|
I would too, versus ANY of the older stuff - unless I was INTO the older stuff.
The overiding consideration is what the OP wants, mated to what the OP wants to or can spend on a car. I'm old-fashioned, but I wouldn't buy anything I couldn't pay cash for - but I would not necessarily jump at the first car unless it fit the bill to a "T." Chances are the opposing insurance company will pay for a rental car for the OP for the next few weeks while he is making up his mind.
The '98-'99 ETD would be an outrageously improved upgrade from a W123-4 in numerous ways. Once you've driven one and get the thrill of it's performance AND economy, you'll likely never go back to the snails pace of any diesel pre-'98.
If he can swing it financially, the CDI would be the way to go I certainly would. Because over time, the CDIs and Bluetec are the better plays looong term going forward, versus the ETDs of '98-'99. Just my expert opinion there.....
Rust is not an issue (anytime soon) in Austin, Texas, where the OP is located.