View Single Post
  #5  
Old 12-07-2011, 05:24 AM
Stretch's Avatar
Stretch Stretch is offline
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Take a look at this

Mercedes-Benz OM617 engine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Power is different - .951 is more powerful

I guess the .950 when fitted to the W116 was using a 722.1?? transmission...

...and the .951 was using a 722.3?? transmission.

The diesel engined versions of the 722.1 and 722.3 will swap between each engine - no problems. However not all 722.XXX transmissions are good for diesels... => different bell housing for petrol engines especially V8s - and different valve body and shift points. Early 722.118s don't even use vacuum for shifting but use a shifter rod to throttle linkage - whilst later 722.118s only use vacuum... so the message is get a transmission that suits your engine if possible!

What type of transmission is fitted to your N/A OM617 engine at the moment?

The 722.118 isn't well regarded - it suffers from spline shaft wear problems and front pump problems

http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/diesel-discussion/299729-advice-reqd-shaft-spline-wear-measurements-possible-fix-722-118-transmission.html

I guess - and I'm only guessing - the extra power from the .951 comes from a different cam and a different IP.
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote