Quote:
Originally Posted by martureo
They would be the only evidence of him being gay.
Otherwise the assertion is an argument from silence. Got it?
|
I agree with that.
In order to imply homosexuality in St Paul we have to judge his words through modern eyes since there is no contemporaneous writing (of which I am aware) that discusses the psychology of repressed homosexuality in the Pharisees.
It takes two leaps of faith to get into St Paul as latently homosexual. It only takes one leap of faith to assume he was heterosexual.
William of Oakham rears his ugly head.