Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-23-2006, 12:25 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 650
Which would you buy?

1984 300D, one owner, 57k miles, no rust, everything works, like new - or...
1996 E300 Diesel 160K, great shape, every option.

These two cars are priced very closely on CL DC. If you had $12-13k, which would you pick? I think I'd be all over the E300...

__________________
1984 300Sd 210k

Former cars:
1984 300D 445k (!!) (Strider) Original (and not rebuilt) engine and transmission. Currently running on V80 ( 80% vegetable oil, 20% petroleum products). Actually not, taking a WVO break.
1993 300d 2.5 275k. Current 120/day commuter
1981 300SD 188k (Hans) Killed by a deer
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-23-2006, 12:30 PM
Save the manuals!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: .
Posts: 3,477
i would get the 123
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-23-2006, 12:44 PM
Professional smart ass
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sunny San Diego
Posts: 723
The choice is simple.....get both
__________________
"spreading a trail of obnoxious where ever we go"
1981 300sd w/ 341,500 miles

http://www.wecrash.com/pics/ddda_banner.gif
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-23-2006, 12:49 PM
Rashakor's Avatar
Darth Diesel
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Philly PA
Posts: 676
yep with 13 grands i would get both!!!
the 84 even pristine is not worth more than 6000 bucks. if you negociate hard you should be able to bring it down to 4000.
the 96 is probably 9000 bucks so together that make 13000 grands!!!

i would get the 123 though, but that because i am biased. with the money saved compared to the E300, you can buy gas and all the maintenance for the next 15 years!
__________________
------------------------------------------
Aquilae non capunt muscas! (Eagles don't hunt flies!)


1979 300SD Black/Black MBtex239000mi
1983 300TD euro-NA. White/Olive Cloth-MBtex 201000mi. Fleet car of the USA embassy in Morocco
1983 240D Labrador Blue/Blue MBtex 161000mi
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-23-2006, 01:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hollywood Hills, CA
Posts: 891
i'd go for the latter...
the w124
__________________
~there is no spoon~

1984 300CD Turbo Diesel (soon to be "powered by VEGGIE") - dolphin silver

1999 e430 Sport blk/blk, my sexy ***** ;-)

(my other girls)
1992 300CE 24V 3.0L (w124) (R.I.P. "she was killed 7/12/03 by some ricer kids speeding in a honda accord")
1990 Acura Integra RS (w/94' engine)
1966 Cadillac Sedan de Ville (Hardtop)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-23-2006, 08:56 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,626
i am partial to the 123 cars but would need some serious convincing on the 57k miles.

it would have to be pretty much as new to be worth that. #1 condition.

tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-23-2006, 09:01 PM
123c
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'd get the '96 E300 if I had the money, since it's a lot newer, and doesn't have all the 22 year old parts that are going to want to fail due to age. Plus the E300 is going to be a much more comfortable with highway driving, as well as City driving.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-23-2006, 09:09 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
I did go for a '96 E300, 210.020. Very nice car. Mine just cut out on me while driving, but I think it's the K40 relay module. The joys of electronics.

The 210 drives far better than the 123 could ever hope. More power too, even without a turbocharger, and noticably better fuel milage.

Edited to add: If they're the same price, the 123 is grossly overpriced or the 210 is underpriced. I guess the former. People think they can get a ton of money for the 123. That's great until you get hit and the insurance company just won't believe you.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-23-2006, 09:57 PM
mplafleur's Avatar
User Friendly
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Lathrup Village, Michigan
Posts: 2,939
I'd be all over the E300 too!!!
__________________
Michael LaFleur

'05 E320 CDI - 86,000 miles
'86 300SDL - 360,000 miles
'85 300SD - 150,000 miles (sold)
'89 190D - 120,000 miles (sold)
'85 300SD - 317,000 miles (sold)
'98 ML320 - 270,000 miles (sold)
'75 300D - 170,000 miles (sold)
'83 Harley Davidson FLTC (Broken again) :-(
'61 Plymouth Valiant - 60k mikes
2004 Papillon (Oliver)
2005 Tzitzu (Griffon)
2009 Welsh Corgi (Buba)

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-23-2006, 10:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 41
The 1996
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-23-2006, 10:56 PM
Benster Tom
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Lightbulb E300

Well, I'd probably take the E300, since you already have a 300D.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-23-2006, 11:07 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
The decision of which vehicle to purchase is a personal decision. Either you prefer one style or the other.

However, if you spend $12K on a W123, you pretty much need to keep it a garage queen. It's priced that way because of it's condition and mileage. Rack up some miles on it and the value will drop like a stone. Furthermore, it's difficult to maintain a vehicle in pristine condition as a daily driver.

If you want a W123 as a daily driver, find one with 125K on the clock in excellent condition and pay about $6K for it. Pocket the difference and enjoy the vehicle for almost the same amount of miles.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-24-2006, 12:05 AM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
Depends what you want. Driven both the W210 is simply a quiter, faster, more comfortable car. Pretty much what you would expect from a more modern design.

The E300D would be a great driver. The 300D is a garage queen/weekend toy.

What are you looking for?

__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page